Cargando…
A realist evaluation of patients’ decisions to deprescribe in the EMPOWER trial
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Successful mechanisms for engaging patients in the deprescribing process remain unknown but may include: (1) triggering motivation to deprescribe by increasing patients’ knowledge and concern about medications; (2) building capacity to taper by augmenting self-efficacy and...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Open
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5566584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28473524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015959 |
_version_ | 1783258576474603520 |
---|---|
author | Martin, Philippe Tannenbaum, Cara |
author_facet | Martin, Philippe Tannenbaum, Cara |
author_sort | Martin, Philippe |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Successful mechanisms for engaging patients in the deprescribing process remain unknown but may include: (1) triggering motivation to deprescribe by increasing patients’ knowledge and concern about medications; (2) building capacity to taper by augmenting self-efficacy and (3) creating opportunities to discuss and receive support for deprescribing from a healthcare provider. We tested these mechanisms during theEliminating Medications through Patient Ownership of End Results (EMPOWER) () trial and investigated the contexts that led to positive and negative deprescribing outcomes. DESIGN: A realist evaluation using a sequential mixed methods approach, conducted alongside the EMPOWER randomised clinical trial. SETTING: Community, Quebec, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: 261 older chronic benzodiazepine consumers, who received the EMPOWER intervention and had complete 6-month follow-up data. INTERVENTION: Mailed deprescribing brochure on benzodiazepines. MEASUREMENTS: Motivation (intent to discuss deprescribing; change in knowledge test score; change in beliefs about the risk–benefits of benzodiazepines, measured with the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire), capacity (self-efficacy for tapering) and opportunity (support from a physician or pharmacist). RESULTS: The intervention triggered the motivation to deprescribe among 167 (n=64%) participants (mean age 74.6 years±6.3, 72% women), demonstrated by improved knowledge (risk difference, 58.50% (95% CI 46.98% to 67.44%)) and increased concern about taking benzodiazepines (risk difference, 67.67% (95% CI 57.36% to 74.91%)). Those who attempted to taper exhibited increased self-efficacy (risk difference, 56.90% (95% CI 45.41% to 65.77%)). Contexts where the deprescribing mechanisms failed included lack of support from a healthcare provider, a focus on short-term quality of life, intolerance to withdrawal symptoms and perceived poor health. CONCLUSION: Deprescribing mechanisms that target patient motivation and capacity to deprescribe yield successful outcomes in contexts where healthcare providers are supportive, and patients do not have internal competing desires to remain on drug therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01148186. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5566584 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55665842017-08-28 A realist evaluation of patients’ decisions to deprescribe in the EMPOWER trial Martin, Philippe Tannenbaum, Cara BMJ Open Geriatric Medicine BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Successful mechanisms for engaging patients in the deprescribing process remain unknown but may include: (1) triggering motivation to deprescribe by increasing patients’ knowledge and concern about medications; (2) building capacity to taper by augmenting self-efficacy and (3) creating opportunities to discuss and receive support for deprescribing from a healthcare provider. We tested these mechanisms during theEliminating Medications through Patient Ownership of End Results (EMPOWER) () trial and investigated the contexts that led to positive and negative deprescribing outcomes. DESIGN: A realist evaluation using a sequential mixed methods approach, conducted alongside the EMPOWER randomised clinical trial. SETTING: Community, Quebec, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: 261 older chronic benzodiazepine consumers, who received the EMPOWER intervention and had complete 6-month follow-up data. INTERVENTION: Mailed deprescribing brochure on benzodiazepines. MEASUREMENTS: Motivation (intent to discuss deprescribing; change in knowledge test score; change in beliefs about the risk–benefits of benzodiazepines, measured with the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire), capacity (self-efficacy for tapering) and opportunity (support from a physician or pharmacist). RESULTS: The intervention triggered the motivation to deprescribe among 167 (n=64%) participants (mean age 74.6 years±6.3, 72% women), demonstrated by improved knowledge (risk difference, 58.50% (95% CI 46.98% to 67.44%)) and increased concern about taking benzodiazepines (risk difference, 67.67% (95% CI 57.36% to 74.91%)). Those who attempted to taper exhibited increased self-efficacy (risk difference, 56.90% (95% CI 45.41% to 65.77%)). Contexts where the deprescribing mechanisms failed included lack of support from a healthcare provider, a focus on short-term quality of life, intolerance to withdrawal symptoms and perceived poor health. CONCLUSION: Deprescribing mechanisms that target patient motivation and capacity to deprescribe yield successful outcomes in contexts where healthcare providers are supportive, and patients do not have internal competing desires to remain on drug therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01148186. BMJ Open 2017-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5566584/ /pubmed/28473524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015959 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Geriatric Medicine Martin, Philippe Tannenbaum, Cara A realist evaluation of patients’ decisions to deprescribe in the EMPOWER trial |
title | A realist evaluation of patients’ decisions to deprescribe in the EMPOWER trial |
title_full | A realist evaluation of patients’ decisions to deprescribe in the EMPOWER trial |
title_fullStr | A realist evaluation of patients’ decisions to deprescribe in the EMPOWER trial |
title_full_unstemmed | A realist evaluation of patients’ decisions to deprescribe in the EMPOWER trial |
title_short | A realist evaluation of patients’ decisions to deprescribe in the EMPOWER trial |
title_sort | realist evaluation of patients’ decisions to deprescribe in the empower trial |
topic | Geriatric Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5566584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28473524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015959 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martinphilippe arealistevaluationofpatientsdecisionstodeprescribeintheempowertrial AT tannenbaumcara arealistevaluationofpatientsdecisionstodeprescribeintheempowertrial AT martinphilippe realistevaluationofpatientsdecisionstodeprescribeintheempowertrial AT tannenbaumcara realistevaluationofpatientsdecisionstodeprescribeintheempowertrial |