Cargando…

A realist evaluation of patients’ decisions to deprescribe in the EMPOWER trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Successful mechanisms for engaging patients in the deprescribing process remain unknown but may include: (1) triggering motivation to deprescribe by increasing patients’ knowledge and concern about medications; (2) building capacity to taper by augmenting self-efficacy and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin, Philippe, Tannenbaum, Cara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Open 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5566584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28473524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015959
_version_ 1783258576474603520
author Martin, Philippe
Tannenbaum, Cara
author_facet Martin, Philippe
Tannenbaum, Cara
author_sort Martin, Philippe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Successful mechanisms for engaging patients in the deprescribing process remain unknown but may include: (1) triggering motivation to deprescribe by increasing patients’ knowledge and concern about medications; (2) building capacity to taper by augmenting self-efficacy and (3) creating opportunities to discuss and receive support for deprescribing from a healthcare provider. We tested these mechanisms during theEliminating Medications through Patient Ownership of End Results (EMPOWER) () trial and investigated the contexts that led to positive and negative deprescribing outcomes. DESIGN: A realist evaluation using a sequential mixed methods approach, conducted alongside the EMPOWER randomised clinical trial. SETTING: Community, Quebec, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: 261 older chronic benzodiazepine consumers, who received the EMPOWER intervention and had complete 6-month follow-up data. INTERVENTION: Mailed deprescribing brochure on benzodiazepines. MEASUREMENTS: Motivation (intent to discuss deprescribing; change in knowledge test score; change in beliefs about the risk–benefits of benzodiazepines, measured with the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire), capacity (self-efficacy for tapering) and opportunity (support from a physician or pharmacist). RESULTS: The intervention triggered the motivation to deprescribe among 167 (n=64%) participants (mean age 74.6 years±6.3, 72% women), demonstrated by improved knowledge (risk difference, 58.50% (95% CI 46.98% to 67.44%)) and increased concern about taking benzodiazepines (risk difference, 67.67% (95% CI 57.36% to 74.91%)). Those who attempted to taper exhibited increased self-efficacy (risk difference, 56.90% (95% CI 45.41% to 65.77%)). Contexts where the deprescribing mechanisms failed included lack of support from a healthcare provider, a focus on short-term quality of life, intolerance to withdrawal symptoms and perceived poor health. CONCLUSION: Deprescribing mechanisms that target patient motivation and capacity to deprescribe yield successful outcomes in contexts where healthcare providers are supportive, and patients do not have internal competing desires to remain on drug therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01148186.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5566584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55665842017-08-28 A realist evaluation of patients’ decisions to deprescribe in the EMPOWER trial Martin, Philippe Tannenbaum, Cara BMJ Open Geriatric Medicine BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Successful mechanisms for engaging patients in the deprescribing process remain unknown but may include: (1) triggering motivation to deprescribe by increasing patients’ knowledge and concern about medications; (2) building capacity to taper by augmenting self-efficacy and (3) creating opportunities to discuss and receive support for deprescribing from a healthcare provider. We tested these mechanisms during theEliminating Medications through Patient Ownership of End Results (EMPOWER) () trial and investigated the contexts that led to positive and negative deprescribing outcomes. DESIGN: A realist evaluation using a sequential mixed methods approach, conducted alongside the EMPOWER randomised clinical trial. SETTING: Community, Quebec, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: 261 older chronic benzodiazepine consumers, who received the EMPOWER intervention and had complete 6-month follow-up data. INTERVENTION: Mailed deprescribing brochure on benzodiazepines. MEASUREMENTS: Motivation (intent to discuss deprescribing; change in knowledge test score; change in beliefs about the risk–benefits of benzodiazepines, measured with the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire), capacity (self-efficacy for tapering) and opportunity (support from a physician or pharmacist). RESULTS: The intervention triggered the motivation to deprescribe among 167 (n=64%) participants (mean age 74.6 years±6.3, 72% women), demonstrated by improved knowledge (risk difference, 58.50% (95% CI 46.98% to 67.44%)) and increased concern about taking benzodiazepines (risk difference, 67.67% (95% CI 57.36% to 74.91%)). Those who attempted to taper exhibited increased self-efficacy (risk difference, 56.90% (95% CI 45.41% to 65.77%)). Contexts where the deprescribing mechanisms failed included lack of support from a healthcare provider, a focus on short-term quality of life, intolerance to withdrawal symptoms and perceived poor health. CONCLUSION: Deprescribing mechanisms that target patient motivation and capacity to deprescribe yield successful outcomes in contexts where healthcare providers are supportive, and patients do not have internal competing desires to remain on drug therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01148186. BMJ Open 2017-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5566584/ /pubmed/28473524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015959 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Geriatric Medicine
Martin, Philippe
Tannenbaum, Cara
A realist evaluation of patients’ decisions to deprescribe in the EMPOWER trial
title A realist evaluation of patients’ decisions to deprescribe in the EMPOWER trial
title_full A realist evaluation of patients’ decisions to deprescribe in the EMPOWER trial
title_fullStr A realist evaluation of patients’ decisions to deprescribe in the EMPOWER trial
title_full_unstemmed A realist evaluation of patients’ decisions to deprescribe in the EMPOWER trial
title_short A realist evaluation of patients’ decisions to deprescribe in the EMPOWER trial
title_sort realist evaluation of patients’ decisions to deprescribe in the empower trial
topic Geriatric Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5566584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28473524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015959
work_keys_str_mv AT martinphilippe arealistevaluationofpatientsdecisionstodeprescribeintheempowertrial
AT tannenbaumcara arealistevaluationofpatientsdecisionstodeprescribeintheempowertrial
AT martinphilippe realistevaluationofpatientsdecisionstodeprescribeintheempowertrial
AT tannenbaumcara realistevaluationofpatientsdecisionstodeprescribeintheempowertrial