Cargando…
An Open Label, Randomized, Comparative, Parallel Group, Multicenter, Prospective, Interventional, Clinical Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of “AHPL/AYTOP/0113” in Comparison with “Framycetin Sulphate Cream” in Acute Wounds
OBJECTIVES: The main objective of the present study was to assess efficacy and safety of AHPL/AYTOP/0113 cream, a polyherbal formulation in comparison with Framycetin sulphate cream in acute wounds. METHODOLOGY: It was an open label, randomized, comparative, parallel group and multi-center clinical...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5566822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28867855 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/asl.ASL_52_16 |
_version_ | 1783258609965072384 |
---|---|
author | Nipanikar, Sanjay U Gajare, Kamalakar V Vaidya, Vidyadhar G Kamthe, Amol B Upasani, Sachin A Kumbhar, Vidyadhar S |
author_facet | Nipanikar, Sanjay U Gajare, Kamalakar V Vaidya, Vidyadhar G Kamthe, Amol B Upasani, Sachin A Kumbhar, Vidyadhar S |
author_sort | Nipanikar, Sanjay U |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The main objective of the present study was to assess efficacy and safety of AHPL/AYTOP/0113 cream, a polyherbal formulation in comparison with Framycetin sulphate cream in acute wounds. METHODOLOGY: It was an open label, randomized, comparative, parallel group and multi-center clinical study. Total 47 subjects were randomly assigned to Group-A (AHPL/AYTOP/0113 cream) and 42 subjects were randomly assigned to Group-B (Framycetin sulphate cream). All the subjects were advised to apply study drug, thrice daily for 21 days or up to complete wound healing (whichever was earlier). All the subjects were called for follow up on days 2, 4, 7, 10, 14, 17 and 21 or up to the day of complete wound healing. Data describing quantitative measures are expressed as mean ± SD. Comparison of variables representing categorical data was performed using Chi-square test. RESULTS: Group-A subjects took significantly less (P < 0.05) i.e., (mean) 7.77 days than (mean) 9.87 days of Group-B subjects for wound healing. At the end of the study, statistically significant better (P < 0.05) results were observed in Group-A than Group-B in mean wound surface area, wound healing parameters and pain associated with wound. Excellent overall efficacy and tolerability was observed in subjects of both the groups. No adverse event or adverse drug reaction was noted in any subject of both the groups. CONCLUSION: AHPL/AYTOP/0113 cream proved to be superior to Framycetin sulphate cream in healing of acute wounds. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5566822 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55668222017-09-01 An Open Label, Randomized, Comparative, Parallel Group, Multicenter, Prospective, Interventional, Clinical Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of “AHPL/AYTOP/0113” in Comparison with “Framycetin Sulphate Cream” in Acute Wounds Nipanikar, Sanjay U Gajare, Kamalakar V Vaidya, Vidyadhar G Kamthe, Amol B Upasani, Sachin A Kumbhar, Vidyadhar S Anc Sci Life Original Article OBJECTIVES: The main objective of the present study was to assess efficacy and safety of AHPL/AYTOP/0113 cream, a polyherbal formulation in comparison with Framycetin sulphate cream in acute wounds. METHODOLOGY: It was an open label, randomized, comparative, parallel group and multi-center clinical study. Total 47 subjects were randomly assigned to Group-A (AHPL/AYTOP/0113 cream) and 42 subjects were randomly assigned to Group-B (Framycetin sulphate cream). All the subjects were advised to apply study drug, thrice daily for 21 days or up to complete wound healing (whichever was earlier). All the subjects were called for follow up on days 2, 4, 7, 10, 14, 17 and 21 or up to the day of complete wound healing. Data describing quantitative measures are expressed as mean ± SD. Comparison of variables representing categorical data was performed using Chi-square test. RESULTS: Group-A subjects took significantly less (P < 0.05) i.e., (mean) 7.77 days than (mean) 9.87 days of Group-B subjects for wound healing. At the end of the study, statistically significant better (P < 0.05) results were observed in Group-A than Group-B in mean wound surface area, wound healing parameters and pain associated with wound. Excellent overall efficacy and tolerability was observed in subjects of both the groups. No adverse event or adverse drug reaction was noted in any subject of both the groups. CONCLUSION: AHPL/AYTOP/0113 cream proved to be superior to Framycetin sulphate cream in healing of acute wounds. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5566822/ /pubmed/28867855 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/asl.ASL_52_16 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Ancient Science of Life http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Nipanikar, Sanjay U Gajare, Kamalakar V Vaidya, Vidyadhar G Kamthe, Amol B Upasani, Sachin A Kumbhar, Vidyadhar S An Open Label, Randomized, Comparative, Parallel Group, Multicenter, Prospective, Interventional, Clinical Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of “AHPL/AYTOP/0113” in Comparison with “Framycetin Sulphate Cream” in Acute Wounds |
title | An Open Label, Randomized, Comparative, Parallel Group, Multicenter, Prospective, Interventional, Clinical Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of “AHPL/AYTOP/0113” in Comparison with “Framycetin Sulphate Cream” in Acute Wounds |
title_full | An Open Label, Randomized, Comparative, Parallel Group, Multicenter, Prospective, Interventional, Clinical Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of “AHPL/AYTOP/0113” in Comparison with “Framycetin Sulphate Cream” in Acute Wounds |
title_fullStr | An Open Label, Randomized, Comparative, Parallel Group, Multicenter, Prospective, Interventional, Clinical Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of “AHPL/AYTOP/0113” in Comparison with “Framycetin Sulphate Cream” in Acute Wounds |
title_full_unstemmed | An Open Label, Randomized, Comparative, Parallel Group, Multicenter, Prospective, Interventional, Clinical Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of “AHPL/AYTOP/0113” in Comparison with “Framycetin Sulphate Cream” in Acute Wounds |
title_short | An Open Label, Randomized, Comparative, Parallel Group, Multicenter, Prospective, Interventional, Clinical Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of “AHPL/AYTOP/0113” in Comparison with “Framycetin Sulphate Cream” in Acute Wounds |
title_sort | open label, randomized, comparative, parallel group, multicenter, prospective, interventional, clinical study to evaluate efficacy and safety of “ahpl/aytop/0113” in comparison with “framycetin sulphate cream” in acute wounds |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5566822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28867855 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/asl.ASL_52_16 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nipanikarsanjayu anopenlabelrandomizedcomparativeparallelgroupmulticenterprospectiveinterventionalclinicalstudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyofahplaytop0113incomparisonwithframycetinsulphatecreaminacutewounds AT gajarekamalakarv anopenlabelrandomizedcomparativeparallelgroupmulticenterprospectiveinterventionalclinicalstudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyofahplaytop0113incomparisonwithframycetinsulphatecreaminacutewounds AT vaidyavidyadharg anopenlabelrandomizedcomparativeparallelgroupmulticenterprospectiveinterventionalclinicalstudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyofahplaytop0113incomparisonwithframycetinsulphatecreaminacutewounds AT kamtheamolb anopenlabelrandomizedcomparativeparallelgroupmulticenterprospectiveinterventionalclinicalstudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyofahplaytop0113incomparisonwithframycetinsulphatecreaminacutewounds AT upasanisachina anopenlabelrandomizedcomparativeparallelgroupmulticenterprospectiveinterventionalclinicalstudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyofahplaytop0113incomparisonwithframycetinsulphatecreaminacutewounds AT kumbharvidyadhars anopenlabelrandomizedcomparativeparallelgroupmulticenterprospectiveinterventionalclinicalstudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyofahplaytop0113incomparisonwithframycetinsulphatecreaminacutewounds AT nipanikarsanjayu openlabelrandomizedcomparativeparallelgroupmulticenterprospectiveinterventionalclinicalstudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyofahplaytop0113incomparisonwithframycetinsulphatecreaminacutewounds AT gajarekamalakarv openlabelrandomizedcomparativeparallelgroupmulticenterprospectiveinterventionalclinicalstudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyofahplaytop0113incomparisonwithframycetinsulphatecreaminacutewounds AT vaidyavidyadharg openlabelrandomizedcomparativeparallelgroupmulticenterprospectiveinterventionalclinicalstudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyofahplaytop0113incomparisonwithframycetinsulphatecreaminacutewounds AT kamtheamolb openlabelrandomizedcomparativeparallelgroupmulticenterprospectiveinterventionalclinicalstudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyofahplaytop0113incomparisonwithframycetinsulphatecreaminacutewounds AT upasanisachina openlabelrandomizedcomparativeparallelgroupmulticenterprospectiveinterventionalclinicalstudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyofahplaytop0113incomparisonwithframycetinsulphatecreaminacutewounds AT kumbharvidyadhars openlabelrandomizedcomparativeparallelgroupmulticenterprospectiveinterventionalclinicalstudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyofahplaytop0113incomparisonwithframycetinsulphatecreaminacutewounds |