Cargando…

An Open Label, Randomized, Comparative, Parallel Group, Multicenter, Prospective, Interventional, Clinical Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of “AHPL/AYTOP/0113” in Comparison with “Framycetin Sulphate Cream” in Acute Wounds

OBJECTIVES: The main objective of the present study was to assess efficacy and safety of AHPL/AYTOP/0113 cream, a polyherbal formulation in comparison with Framycetin sulphate cream in acute wounds. METHODOLOGY: It was an open label, randomized, comparative, parallel group and multi-center clinical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nipanikar, Sanjay U, Gajare, Kamalakar V, Vaidya, Vidyadhar G, Kamthe, Amol B, Upasani, Sachin A, Kumbhar, Vidyadhar S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5566822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28867855
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/asl.ASL_52_16
_version_ 1783258609965072384
author Nipanikar, Sanjay U
Gajare, Kamalakar V
Vaidya, Vidyadhar G
Kamthe, Amol B
Upasani, Sachin A
Kumbhar, Vidyadhar S
author_facet Nipanikar, Sanjay U
Gajare, Kamalakar V
Vaidya, Vidyadhar G
Kamthe, Amol B
Upasani, Sachin A
Kumbhar, Vidyadhar S
author_sort Nipanikar, Sanjay U
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The main objective of the present study was to assess efficacy and safety of AHPL/AYTOP/0113 cream, a polyherbal formulation in comparison with Framycetin sulphate cream in acute wounds. METHODOLOGY: It was an open label, randomized, comparative, parallel group and multi-center clinical study. Total 47 subjects were randomly assigned to Group-A (AHPL/AYTOP/0113 cream) and 42 subjects were randomly assigned to Group-B (Framycetin sulphate cream). All the subjects were advised to apply study drug, thrice daily for 21 days or up to complete wound healing (whichever was earlier). All the subjects were called for follow up on days 2, 4, 7, 10, 14, 17 and 21 or up to the day of complete wound healing. Data describing quantitative measures are expressed as mean ± SD. Comparison of variables representing categorical data was performed using Chi-square test. RESULTS: Group-A subjects took significantly less (P < 0.05) i.e., (mean) 7.77 days than (mean) 9.87 days of Group-B subjects for wound healing. At the end of the study, statistically significant better (P < 0.05) results were observed in Group-A than Group-B in mean wound surface area, wound healing parameters and pain associated with wound. Excellent overall efficacy and tolerability was observed in subjects of both the groups. No adverse event or adverse drug reaction was noted in any subject of both the groups. CONCLUSION: AHPL/AYTOP/0113 cream proved to be superior to Framycetin sulphate cream in healing of acute wounds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5566822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55668222017-09-01 An Open Label, Randomized, Comparative, Parallel Group, Multicenter, Prospective, Interventional, Clinical Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of “AHPL/AYTOP/0113” in Comparison with “Framycetin Sulphate Cream” in Acute Wounds Nipanikar, Sanjay U Gajare, Kamalakar V Vaidya, Vidyadhar G Kamthe, Amol B Upasani, Sachin A Kumbhar, Vidyadhar S Anc Sci Life Original Article OBJECTIVES: The main objective of the present study was to assess efficacy and safety of AHPL/AYTOP/0113 cream, a polyherbal formulation in comparison with Framycetin sulphate cream in acute wounds. METHODOLOGY: It was an open label, randomized, comparative, parallel group and multi-center clinical study. Total 47 subjects were randomly assigned to Group-A (AHPL/AYTOP/0113 cream) and 42 subjects were randomly assigned to Group-B (Framycetin sulphate cream). All the subjects were advised to apply study drug, thrice daily for 21 days or up to complete wound healing (whichever was earlier). All the subjects were called for follow up on days 2, 4, 7, 10, 14, 17 and 21 or up to the day of complete wound healing. Data describing quantitative measures are expressed as mean ± SD. Comparison of variables representing categorical data was performed using Chi-square test. RESULTS: Group-A subjects took significantly less (P < 0.05) i.e., (mean) 7.77 days than (mean) 9.87 days of Group-B subjects for wound healing. At the end of the study, statistically significant better (P < 0.05) results were observed in Group-A than Group-B in mean wound surface area, wound healing parameters and pain associated with wound. Excellent overall efficacy and tolerability was observed in subjects of both the groups. No adverse event or adverse drug reaction was noted in any subject of both the groups. CONCLUSION: AHPL/AYTOP/0113 cream proved to be superior to Framycetin sulphate cream in healing of acute wounds. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5566822/ /pubmed/28867855 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/asl.ASL_52_16 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Ancient Science of Life http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nipanikar, Sanjay U
Gajare, Kamalakar V
Vaidya, Vidyadhar G
Kamthe, Amol B
Upasani, Sachin A
Kumbhar, Vidyadhar S
An Open Label, Randomized, Comparative, Parallel Group, Multicenter, Prospective, Interventional, Clinical Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of “AHPL/AYTOP/0113” in Comparison with “Framycetin Sulphate Cream” in Acute Wounds
title An Open Label, Randomized, Comparative, Parallel Group, Multicenter, Prospective, Interventional, Clinical Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of “AHPL/AYTOP/0113” in Comparison with “Framycetin Sulphate Cream” in Acute Wounds
title_full An Open Label, Randomized, Comparative, Parallel Group, Multicenter, Prospective, Interventional, Clinical Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of “AHPL/AYTOP/0113” in Comparison with “Framycetin Sulphate Cream” in Acute Wounds
title_fullStr An Open Label, Randomized, Comparative, Parallel Group, Multicenter, Prospective, Interventional, Clinical Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of “AHPL/AYTOP/0113” in Comparison with “Framycetin Sulphate Cream” in Acute Wounds
title_full_unstemmed An Open Label, Randomized, Comparative, Parallel Group, Multicenter, Prospective, Interventional, Clinical Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of “AHPL/AYTOP/0113” in Comparison with “Framycetin Sulphate Cream” in Acute Wounds
title_short An Open Label, Randomized, Comparative, Parallel Group, Multicenter, Prospective, Interventional, Clinical Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of “AHPL/AYTOP/0113” in Comparison with “Framycetin Sulphate Cream” in Acute Wounds
title_sort open label, randomized, comparative, parallel group, multicenter, prospective, interventional, clinical study to evaluate efficacy and safety of “ahpl/aytop/0113” in comparison with “framycetin sulphate cream” in acute wounds
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5566822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28867855
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/asl.ASL_52_16
work_keys_str_mv AT nipanikarsanjayu anopenlabelrandomizedcomparativeparallelgroupmulticenterprospectiveinterventionalclinicalstudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyofahplaytop0113incomparisonwithframycetinsulphatecreaminacutewounds
AT gajarekamalakarv anopenlabelrandomizedcomparativeparallelgroupmulticenterprospectiveinterventionalclinicalstudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyofahplaytop0113incomparisonwithframycetinsulphatecreaminacutewounds
AT vaidyavidyadharg anopenlabelrandomizedcomparativeparallelgroupmulticenterprospectiveinterventionalclinicalstudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyofahplaytop0113incomparisonwithframycetinsulphatecreaminacutewounds
AT kamtheamolb anopenlabelrandomizedcomparativeparallelgroupmulticenterprospectiveinterventionalclinicalstudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyofahplaytop0113incomparisonwithframycetinsulphatecreaminacutewounds
AT upasanisachina anopenlabelrandomizedcomparativeparallelgroupmulticenterprospectiveinterventionalclinicalstudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyofahplaytop0113incomparisonwithframycetinsulphatecreaminacutewounds
AT kumbharvidyadhars anopenlabelrandomizedcomparativeparallelgroupmulticenterprospectiveinterventionalclinicalstudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyofahplaytop0113incomparisonwithframycetinsulphatecreaminacutewounds
AT nipanikarsanjayu openlabelrandomizedcomparativeparallelgroupmulticenterprospectiveinterventionalclinicalstudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyofahplaytop0113incomparisonwithframycetinsulphatecreaminacutewounds
AT gajarekamalakarv openlabelrandomizedcomparativeparallelgroupmulticenterprospectiveinterventionalclinicalstudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyofahplaytop0113incomparisonwithframycetinsulphatecreaminacutewounds
AT vaidyavidyadharg openlabelrandomizedcomparativeparallelgroupmulticenterprospectiveinterventionalclinicalstudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyofahplaytop0113incomparisonwithframycetinsulphatecreaminacutewounds
AT kamtheamolb openlabelrandomizedcomparativeparallelgroupmulticenterprospectiveinterventionalclinicalstudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyofahplaytop0113incomparisonwithframycetinsulphatecreaminacutewounds
AT upasanisachina openlabelrandomizedcomparativeparallelgroupmulticenterprospectiveinterventionalclinicalstudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyofahplaytop0113incomparisonwithframycetinsulphatecreaminacutewounds
AT kumbharvidyadhars openlabelrandomizedcomparativeparallelgroupmulticenterprospectiveinterventionalclinicalstudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyofahplaytop0113incomparisonwithframycetinsulphatecreaminacutewounds