Cargando…

Predictive efficacy of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason grading system in initially diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer

We compared the predictive ability of the 2014 and 2005 Gleason grading systems in 568 patients initially diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer (PCa). Outcomes included the duration of castration-resistant prostate cancer-free survival (CFS) and overall survival (OS). Univariate analyses and log...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Sun, Guang-Xi, Shen, Peng-Fei, Zhang, Xing-Ming, Gong, Jing, Gui, Hao-Jun, Shu, Kun-Peng, Liu, Jiang-Dong, Zhao, Jinge, Yang, Yao-Jing, Chen, Xue-Qin, Chen, Ni, Zeng, Hao
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:	Original Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5566852/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27569001 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.186184

Ejemplares similares

The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason grading consensus on active surveillance for prostate cancer
por: Ramakrishnan, Venkat M., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The validation of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for patients with high-risk prostate cancer: a single-center retrospective study
por: Liu, Jiandong, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Review by urological pathologists improves the accuracy of Gleason grading by general pathologists
por: Nakai, Yasushi, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Gleason grading of prostate cancer in needle core biopsies: a comparison of general and urologic pathologists
por: Al-Maghrabi, Jaudah Ahmed, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Prognostic Utility of the Gleason Grading System Revisions and Histopathological Factors Beyond Gleason Grade
por: Zelic, Renata, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Refining the American Urological Association and American Society for Radiation Oncology guideline for adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy using the pathologic Gleason score
por: Song, Wan, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Significant prognostic difference between Grade Group 4 and 5 in the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Grading System for High Grade Prostate Cancer with Bone Metastasis
por: Yamada, Yasutaka, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Clinically applicable Gleason grading (GD) system for prostate cancer based on deep learning
por: Niu, Yun, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Prognostic Value of the New Prostate Cancer International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Groups
por: Offermann, Anne, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma
por: van Leenders, Geert J.L.H., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

International Opinions on Grading of Urothelial Carcinoma: A Survey Among European Association of Urology and International Society of Urological Pathology Members
por: Beijert, Irene J., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Biochemical Recurrence in Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer in Korean Men: Significance of the Primary Gleason Grade
por: Ro, Yun Kwan, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Prostate Cancer in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome Is Associated with Low Grade Gleason Score When Diagnosed on Biopsy
por: Jeon, Kyoung Pil, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and Gleason grading of prostate cancer: the PANDA challenge
por: Bulten, Wouter, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Predicting Prostate Cancer Upgrading of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group at Radical Prostatectomy Using Machine Learning-Assisted Decision-Support Models
por: Liu, Hailang, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The Utilization of Gleason Grade as the Primary Criterion for Ordering Nuclear Bone Scan in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients
por: Ritenour, Chad W. M., et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Impact of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Grading System on Concept of High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Comparison of Long-Term Oncological Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy
por: Milonas, Daimantas, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Predicting prostate cancer specific-mortality with artificial intelligence-based Gleason grading
por: Wulczyn, Ellery, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Differences in survival of prostate cancer Gleason 8–10 disease and the establishment of a new Gleason survival grading system
por: Zhou, Yuan, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Validation of the World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology grading for Chinese patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma
por: Xiao, Qiao, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Quantification of the individual risk of each Gleason pattern, including tertiary Gleason pattern 5, after radical prostatectomy: development of the modified Gleason grade grouping (mGGG) model
por: Taguchi, Satoru, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Reporting Gleason grade/score in synoptic reports of radical prostatectomies
por: Renshaw, Andrew A., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Androgen deprivation therapy and Gleason grade: unravelling implications on survival
por: Scott, Michael, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Reliability of society of fetal urology and Onen grading system in fetal hydronephrosis
por: Cho, Hee Young, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Narrative review of prostate cancer grading systems: will the Gleason scores be replaced by the Grade Groups?
por: Montironi, Rodolfo, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Circulating preoperative testosterone level predicts unfavourable disease at radical prostatectomy in men with International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group 1 prostate cancer diagnosed with systematic biopsies
por: Ferro, Matteo, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Correlation of concentrations of selected trace elements with Gleason grade of prostate tissues
por: Banas, A., et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Pelvic nodal radiotherapy in Gleason grade group 5 prostate cancer
por: Cook, Kiri, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Predicting Insignificant Prostate Cancer: Analysis of the Pathological Outcomes of Candidates for Active Surveillance according to the Pre-International Society of Urological Pathology (Pre-ISUP) 2014 Era Versus the Post-ISUP2014 Era
por: Chung, Mun Su, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

High SPOCK1 Expression Is Associated with Advanced Stage, T Value, and Gleason Grade in Prostate Cancer
por: Chen, Mei-Ling, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Prediction of metastatic prostate cancer by prostate-specific antigen in combination with T stage and Gleason Grade: Nationwide, population-based register study
por: Thomsen, Frederik B., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Correlation of MRI-Lesion Targeted Biopsy vs. Systematic Biopsy Gleason Score with Final Pathological Gleason Score after Radical Prostatectomy
por: Wenzel, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A high high-density lipoprotein level is associated with Gleason score upgrade in Chinese patients diagnosed with high-grade prostate carcinoma
por: Lyu, Jingcheng, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Automated Gleason grading of prostate cancer tissue microarrays via deep learning
por: Arvaniti, Eirini, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Artificial intelligence assistance significantly improves Gleason grading of prostate biopsies by pathologists
por: Bulten, Wouter, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Association between Nuclear Morphometry Parameters and Gleason Grade in Patients with Prostatic Cancer
por: Malshy, Kamil, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cribriform architecture outperforms Gleason pattern 4 percentage and tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in predicting the outcome of Grade Group 2 prostate cancer patients
por: Seyrek, Neslisah, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Pediatric robotic urologic surgery-2014
por: Kearns, James T., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

BMC Urology reviewer acknowledgement 2014
por: Henderson, Hayley
Publicado: (2015)

Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Biopsy Specimens
por: Nagpal, Kunal, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_e5lp3garkgctiri57t8ee5452b