Cargando…

Accuracy of Alcon WaveLight(®) EX500 optical pachymetry during LASIK

PURPOSE: To study the accuracy and reliability of optical pachymetry using the Alcon WaveLight EX500 during laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of 90 eyes from 45 patients who had undergone LASIK (mean age 35.2±8.2 years; 19 mal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mifflin, Mark D, Mortensen, Xavier M, Betts, Brent S, Gross, Cole, Zaugg, Brian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5566874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28860701
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S138459
_version_ 1783258620365897728
author Mifflin, Mark D
Mortensen, Xavier M
Betts, Brent S
Gross, Cole
Zaugg, Brian
author_facet Mifflin, Mark D
Mortensen, Xavier M
Betts, Brent S
Gross, Cole
Zaugg, Brian
author_sort Mifflin, Mark D
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To study the accuracy and reliability of optical pachymetry using the Alcon WaveLight EX500 during laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of 90 eyes from 45 patients who had undergone LASIK (mean age 35.2±8.2 years; 19 males, 26 females). The WaveLight FS200 femtosecond laser was programmed to cut LASIK flaps at a desired depth of 120 μm. Optical low-coherence reflectometry (WaveLight EX500) was used to measure central corneal thickness prior to lifting the flap, and the residual stromal bed immediately after excimer ablation. Flap thickness (FT) was calculated using simple subtraction. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was used to measure central corneal thickness, flap thickness, and residual stromal bed in the postoperative period and the results compared to intraoperative measurements. RESULTS: Mean programmed FS200 FT was 119 μm. Mean FT using EX500 optical pachymetry was 109 μm. The difference between FS200- programmed and EX500-measured FT was 9 μm (P<0.001). There was also a significant difference between the EX500 and OCT FT (109 μm vs 119 μm, respectively; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: FT values calculated using intraoperative EX500 optical pachymetry were significantly lower than programmed FS200 values or OCT measurements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5566874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55668742017-08-31 Accuracy of Alcon WaveLight(®) EX500 optical pachymetry during LASIK Mifflin, Mark D Mortensen, Xavier M Betts, Brent S Gross, Cole Zaugg, Brian Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To study the accuracy and reliability of optical pachymetry using the Alcon WaveLight EX500 during laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of 90 eyes from 45 patients who had undergone LASIK (mean age 35.2±8.2 years; 19 males, 26 females). The WaveLight FS200 femtosecond laser was programmed to cut LASIK flaps at a desired depth of 120 μm. Optical low-coherence reflectometry (WaveLight EX500) was used to measure central corneal thickness prior to lifting the flap, and the residual stromal bed immediately after excimer ablation. Flap thickness (FT) was calculated using simple subtraction. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was used to measure central corneal thickness, flap thickness, and residual stromal bed in the postoperative period and the results compared to intraoperative measurements. RESULTS: Mean programmed FS200 FT was 119 μm. Mean FT using EX500 optical pachymetry was 109 μm. The difference between FS200- programmed and EX500-measured FT was 9 μm (P<0.001). There was also a significant difference between the EX500 and OCT FT (109 μm vs 119 μm, respectively; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: FT values calculated using intraoperative EX500 optical pachymetry were significantly lower than programmed FS200 values or OCT measurements. Dove Medical Press 2017-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5566874/ /pubmed/28860701 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S138459 Text en © 2017 Mifflin et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Mifflin, Mark D
Mortensen, Xavier M
Betts, Brent S
Gross, Cole
Zaugg, Brian
Accuracy of Alcon WaveLight(®) EX500 optical pachymetry during LASIK
title Accuracy of Alcon WaveLight(®) EX500 optical pachymetry during LASIK
title_full Accuracy of Alcon WaveLight(®) EX500 optical pachymetry during LASIK
title_fullStr Accuracy of Alcon WaveLight(®) EX500 optical pachymetry during LASIK
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Alcon WaveLight(®) EX500 optical pachymetry during LASIK
title_short Accuracy of Alcon WaveLight(®) EX500 optical pachymetry during LASIK
title_sort accuracy of alcon wavelight(®) ex500 optical pachymetry during lasik
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5566874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28860701
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S138459
work_keys_str_mv AT mifflinmarkd accuracyofalconwavelightex500opticalpachymetryduringlasik
AT mortensenxavierm accuracyofalconwavelightex500opticalpachymetryduringlasik
AT bettsbrents accuracyofalconwavelightex500opticalpachymetryduringlasik
AT grosscole accuracyofalconwavelightex500opticalpachymetryduringlasik
AT zauggbrian accuracyofalconwavelightex500opticalpachymetryduringlasik