Cargando…

Lumbar Single-Level Dynamic Stabilization with Semi-Rigid and Full Dynamic Systems: A Retrospective Clinical and Radiological Analysis of 71 Patients

BACKGROUND: This study compares the clinical and radiological results of three most commonly used dynamic stabilization systems in the field of orthopedic surgery. METHODS: A total of 71 patients underwent single-level posterior transpedicular dynamic stabilization between 2011 and 2014 due to lumba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ozer, Ali Fahir, Oktenoglu, Tunc, Egemen, Emrah, Sasani, Mehdi, Yilmaz, Atilla, Erbulut, Deniz Ufuk, Yaman, Onur, Suzer, Tuncer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5567026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28861198
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2017.9.3.310
_version_ 1783258643980877824
author Ozer, Ali Fahir
Oktenoglu, Tunc
Egemen, Emrah
Sasani, Mehdi
Yilmaz, Atilla
Erbulut, Deniz Ufuk
Yaman, Onur
Suzer, Tuncer
author_facet Ozer, Ali Fahir
Oktenoglu, Tunc
Egemen, Emrah
Sasani, Mehdi
Yilmaz, Atilla
Erbulut, Deniz Ufuk
Yaman, Onur
Suzer, Tuncer
author_sort Ozer, Ali Fahir
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study compares the clinical and radiological results of three most commonly used dynamic stabilization systems in the field of orthopedic surgery. METHODS: A total of 71 patients underwent single-level posterior transpedicular dynamic stabilization between 2011 and 2014 due to lumbar degenerative disc disease. Three different dynamic systems used include: (1) the Dynesys system; (2) a dynamic screw with a PEEK rod; and (3) a full dynamic system (a dynamic screw with a dynamic rod; BalanC). The mean patient age was 45.8 years. The mean follow-up was 29.7 months. Clinical and radiological data were obtained for each patient preoperatively and at 6, 12, and 24 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Clinical outcomes were significantly improved in all patients. There were no significant differences in the radiological outcomes among the groups divided according to the system used. Screw loosening was detected in 2 patients, and 1 patient developed screw breakage. All patients with screw loosening or breakage underwent revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Each procedure offered satisfactory outcome regardless of which system was applied.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5567026
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Korean Orthopaedic Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55670262017-09-01 Lumbar Single-Level Dynamic Stabilization with Semi-Rigid and Full Dynamic Systems: A Retrospective Clinical and Radiological Analysis of 71 Patients Ozer, Ali Fahir Oktenoglu, Tunc Egemen, Emrah Sasani, Mehdi Yilmaz, Atilla Erbulut, Deniz Ufuk Yaman, Onur Suzer, Tuncer Clin Orthop Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: This study compares the clinical and radiological results of three most commonly used dynamic stabilization systems in the field of orthopedic surgery. METHODS: A total of 71 patients underwent single-level posterior transpedicular dynamic stabilization between 2011 and 2014 due to lumbar degenerative disc disease. Three different dynamic systems used include: (1) the Dynesys system; (2) a dynamic screw with a PEEK rod; and (3) a full dynamic system (a dynamic screw with a dynamic rod; BalanC). The mean patient age was 45.8 years. The mean follow-up was 29.7 months. Clinical and radiological data were obtained for each patient preoperatively and at 6, 12, and 24 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Clinical outcomes were significantly improved in all patients. There were no significant differences in the radiological outcomes among the groups divided according to the system used. Screw loosening was detected in 2 patients, and 1 patient developed screw breakage. All patients with screw loosening or breakage underwent revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Each procedure offered satisfactory outcome regardless of which system was applied. The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2017-09 2017-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5567026/ /pubmed/28861198 http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2017.9.3.310 Text en Copyright © 2017 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ozer, Ali Fahir
Oktenoglu, Tunc
Egemen, Emrah
Sasani, Mehdi
Yilmaz, Atilla
Erbulut, Deniz Ufuk
Yaman, Onur
Suzer, Tuncer
Lumbar Single-Level Dynamic Stabilization with Semi-Rigid and Full Dynamic Systems: A Retrospective Clinical and Radiological Analysis of 71 Patients
title Lumbar Single-Level Dynamic Stabilization with Semi-Rigid and Full Dynamic Systems: A Retrospective Clinical and Radiological Analysis of 71 Patients
title_full Lumbar Single-Level Dynamic Stabilization with Semi-Rigid and Full Dynamic Systems: A Retrospective Clinical and Radiological Analysis of 71 Patients
title_fullStr Lumbar Single-Level Dynamic Stabilization with Semi-Rigid and Full Dynamic Systems: A Retrospective Clinical and Radiological Analysis of 71 Patients
title_full_unstemmed Lumbar Single-Level Dynamic Stabilization with Semi-Rigid and Full Dynamic Systems: A Retrospective Clinical and Radiological Analysis of 71 Patients
title_short Lumbar Single-Level Dynamic Stabilization with Semi-Rigid and Full Dynamic Systems: A Retrospective Clinical and Radiological Analysis of 71 Patients
title_sort lumbar single-level dynamic stabilization with semi-rigid and full dynamic systems: a retrospective clinical and radiological analysis of 71 patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5567026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28861198
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2017.9.3.310
work_keys_str_mv AT ozeralifahir lumbarsingleleveldynamicstabilizationwithsemirigidandfulldynamicsystemsaretrospectiveclinicalandradiologicalanalysisof71patients
AT oktenoglutunc lumbarsingleleveldynamicstabilizationwithsemirigidandfulldynamicsystemsaretrospectiveclinicalandradiologicalanalysisof71patients
AT egemenemrah lumbarsingleleveldynamicstabilizationwithsemirigidandfulldynamicsystemsaretrospectiveclinicalandradiologicalanalysisof71patients
AT sasanimehdi lumbarsingleleveldynamicstabilizationwithsemirigidandfulldynamicsystemsaretrospectiveclinicalandradiologicalanalysisof71patients
AT yilmazatilla lumbarsingleleveldynamicstabilizationwithsemirigidandfulldynamicsystemsaretrospectiveclinicalandradiologicalanalysisof71patients
AT erbulutdenizufuk lumbarsingleleveldynamicstabilizationwithsemirigidandfulldynamicsystemsaretrospectiveclinicalandradiologicalanalysisof71patients
AT yamanonur lumbarsingleleveldynamicstabilizationwithsemirigidandfulldynamicsystemsaretrospectiveclinicalandradiologicalanalysisof71patients
AT suzertuncer lumbarsingleleveldynamicstabilizationwithsemirigidandfulldynamicsystemsaretrospectiveclinicalandradiologicalanalysisof71patients