Cargando…

Working memory accuracy for multiple targets is driven by reward expectation and stimulus contrast with different time-courses

The richness of sensory input dictates that the brain must prioritize and select information for further processing and storage in working memory. Stimulus salience and reward expectations influence this prioritization but their relative contributions and underlying mechanisms are poorly understood....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klink, P. Christiaan, Jeurissen, Danique, Theeuwes, Jan, Denys, Damiaan, Roelfsema, Pieter R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5567292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28831072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08608-4
_version_ 1783258700023070720
author Klink, P. Christiaan
Jeurissen, Danique
Theeuwes, Jan
Denys, Damiaan
Roelfsema, Pieter R.
author_facet Klink, P. Christiaan
Jeurissen, Danique
Theeuwes, Jan
Denys, Damiaan
Roelfsema, Pieter R.
author_sort Klink, P. Christiaan
collection PubMed
description The richness of sensory input dictates that the brain must prioritize and select information for further processing and storage in working memory. Stimulus salience and reward expectations influence this prioritization but their relative contributions and underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Here we investigate how the quality of working memory for multiple stimuli is determined by priority during encoding and later memory phases. Selective attention could, for instance, act as the primary gating mechanism when stimuli are still visible. Alternatively, observers might still be able to shift priorities across memories during maintenance or retrieval. To distinguish between these possibilities, we investigated how and when reward cues determine working memory accuracy and found that they were only effective during memory encoding. Previously learned, but currently non-predictive, color-reward associations had a similar influence, which gradually weakened without reinforcement. Finally, we show that bottom-up salience, manipulated through varying stimulus contrast, influences memory accuracy during encoding with a fundamentally different time-course than top-down reward cues. While reward-based effects required long stimulus presentation, the influence of contrast was strongest with brief presentations. Our results demonstrate how memory resources are distributed over memory targets and implicates selective attention as a main gating mechanism between sensory and memory systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5567292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55672922017-09-01 Working memory accuracy for multiple targets is driven by reward expectation and stimulus contrast with different time-courses Klink, P. Christiaan Jeurissen, Danique Theeuwes, Jan Denys, Damiaan Roelfsema, Pieter R. Sci Rep Article The richness of sensory input dictates that the brain must prioritize and select information for further processing and storage in working memory. Stimulus salience and reward expectations influence this prioritization but their relative contributions and underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Here we investigate how the quality of working memory for multiple stimuli is determined by priority during encoding and later memory phases. Selective attention could, for instance, act as the primary gating mechanism when stimuli are still visible. Alternatively, observers might still be able to shift priorities across memories during maintenance or retrieval. To distinguish between these possibilities, we investigated how and when reward cues determine working memory accuracy and found that they were only effective during memory encoding. Previously learned, but currently non-predictive, color-reward associations had a similar influence, which gradually weakened without reinforcement. Finally, we show that bottom-up salience, manipulated through varying stimulus contrast, influences memory accuracy during encoding with a fundamentally different time-course than top-down reward cues. While reward-based effects required long stimulus presentation, the influence of contrast was strongest with brief presentations. Our results demonstrate how memory resources are distributed over memory targets and implicates selective attention as a main gating mechanism between sensory and memory systems. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5567292/ /pubmed/28831072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08608-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Klink, P. Christiaan
Jeurissen, Danique
Theeuwes, Jan
Denys, Damiaan
Roelfsema, Pieter R.
Working memory accuracy for multiple targets is driven by reward expectation and stimulus contrast with different time-courses
title Working memory accuracy for multiple targets is driven by reward expectation and stimulus contrast with different time-courses
title_full Working memory accuracy for multiple targets is driven by reward expectation and stimulus contrast with different time-courses
title_fullStr Working memory accuracy for multiple targets is driven by reward expectation and stimulus contrast with different time-courses
title_full_unstemmed Working memory accuracy for multiple targets is driven by reward expectation and stimulus contrast with different time-courses
title_short Working memory accuracy for multiple targets is driven by reward expectation and stimulus contrast with different time-courses
title_sort working memory accuracy for multiple targets is driven by reward expectation and stimulus contrast with different time-courses
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5567292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28831072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08608-4
work_keys_str_mv AT klinkpchristiaan workingmemoryaccuracyformultipletargetsisdrivenbyrewardexpectationandstimuluscontrastwithdifferenttimecourses
AT jeurissendanique workingmemoryaccuracyformultipletargetsisdrivenbyrewardexpectationandstimuluscontrastwithdifferenttimecourses
AT theeuwesjan workingmemoryaccuracyformultipletargetsisdrivenbyrewardexpectationandstimuluscontrastwithdifferenttimecourses
AT denysdamiaan workingmemoryaccuracyformultipletargetsisdrivenbyrewardexpectationandstimuluscontrastwithdifferenttimecourses
AT roelfsemapieterr workingmemoryaccuracyformultipletargetsisdrivenbyrewardexpectationandstimuluscontrastwithdifferenttimecourses