Cargando…
Discrepancies between leg-to-leg bioelectrical Impedance analysis and computerized tomography in abdominal visceral fat measurement
The aim of this study was to evaluate leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance analysis (LBIA) using a four-contact electrode system for measuring abdominal visceral fat area (VFA). The present study recruited 381 (240 male and 141 female) Chinese participants to compare VFA measurements estimated by a st...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5567333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28831095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08991-y |
_version_ | 1783258709320794112 |
---|---|
author | Lu, Hsueh-Kuan Chen, Yu-Yawn Yeh, Chinagwen Chuang, Chih-Lin Chiang, Li-Ming Lai, Chung-Liang Casebolt, Kevin M. Huang, Ai-Chun Lin, Wen-Long Hsieh, Kuen-Chang |
author_facet | Lu, Hsueh-Kuan Chen, Yu-Yawn Yeh, Chinagwen Chuang, Chih-Lin Chiang, Li-Ming Lai, Chung-Liang Casebolt, Kevin M. Huang, Ai-Chun Lin, Wen-Long Hsieh, Kuen-Chang |
author_sort | Lu, Hsueh-Kuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to evaluate leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance analysis (LBIA) using a four-contact electrode system for measuring abdominal visceral fat area (VFA). The present study recruited 381 (240 male and 141 female) Chinese participants to compare VFA measurements estimated by a standing LBIA system (VFALBIA) with computerized tomography (CT) scanned at the L4-L5 vertebrae (VFA(CT)). The total mean body mass index (BMI) was 24.7 ± 4.2 kg/m(2). Correlation analysis, regression analysis, Bland-Altman plot, and paired sample t-tests were used to analyze the accuracy of the VFA(LBIA). For the total subjects, the regression line was VFA(LBIA) = 0.698 VFA(CT) + 29.521, (correlation coefficient (r) = 0.789, standard estimate of error (SEE) = 24.470 cm(2), p < 0.001), Lin’s correlation coefficient (CCC) was 0.785; and the limit of agreement (LOA; mean difference ±2 standard deviation) ranged from −43.950 to 67.951 cm(2), LOA% (given as a percentage of mean value measured by the CT) was 48.2%. VFA(LBIA) and VFA(CT) showed significant difference (p < 0.001). Collectively, the current study indicates that LBIA has limited potential to accurately estimate visceral fat in a clinical setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5567333 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55673332017-09-01 Discrepancies between leg-to-leg bioelectrical Impedance analysis and computerized tomography in abdominal visceral fat measurement Lu, Hsueh-Kuan Chen, Yu-Yawn Yeh, Chinagwen Chuang, Chih-Lin Chiang, Li-Ming Lai, Chung-Liang Casebolt, Kevin M. Huang, Ai-Chun Lin, Wen-Long Hsieh, Kuen-Chang Sci Rep Article The aim of this study was to evaluate leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance analysis (LBIA) using a four-contact electrode system for measuring abdominal visceral fat area (VFA). The present study recruited 381 (240 male and 141 female) Chinese participants to compare VFA measurements estimated by a standing LBIA system (VFALBIA) with computerized tomography (CT) scanned at the L4-L5 vertebrae (VFA(CT)). The total mean body mass index (BMI) was 24.7 ± 4.2 kg/m(2). Correlation analysis, regression analysis, Bland-Altman plot, and paired sample t-tests were used to analyze the accuracy of the VFA(LBIA). For the total subjects, the regression line was VFA(LBIA) = 0.698 VFA(CT) + 29.521, (correlation coefficient (r) = 0.789, standard estimate of error (SEE) = 24.470 cm(2), p < 0.001), Lin’s correlation coefficient (CCC) was 0.785; and the limit of agreement (LOA; mean difference ±2 standard deviation) ranged from −43.950 to 67.951 cm(2), LOA% (given as a percentage of mean value measured by the CT) was 48.2%. VFA(LBIA) and VFA(CT) showed significant difference (p < 0.001). Collectively, the current study indicates that LBIA has limited potential to accurately estimate visceral fat in a clinical setting. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5567333/ /pubmed/28831095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08991-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Lu, Hsueh-Kuan Chen, Yu-Yawn Yeh, Chinagwen Chuang, Chih-Lin Chiang, Li-Ming Lai, Chung-Liang Casebolt, Kevin M. Huang, Ai-Chun Lin, Wen-Long Hsieh, Kuen-Chang Discrepancies between leg-to-leg bioelectrical Impedance analysis and computerized tomography in abdominal visceral fat measurement |
title | Discrepancies between leg-to-leg bioelectrical Impedance analysis and computerized tomography in abdominal visceral fat measurement |
title_full | Discrepancies between leg-to-leg bioelectrical Impedance analysis and computerized tomography in abdominal visceral fat measurement |
title_fullStr | Discrepancies between leg-to-leg bioelectrical Impedance analysis and computerized tomography in abdominal visceral fat measurement |
title_full_unstemmed | Discrepancies between leg-to-leg bioelectrical Impedance analysis and computerized tomography in abdominal visceral fat measurement |
title_short | Discrepancies between leg-to-leg bioelectrical Impedance analysis and computerized tomography in abdominal visceral fat measurement |
title_sort | discrepancies between leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance analysis and computerized tomography in abdominal visceral fat measurement |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5567333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28831095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08991-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luhsuehkuan discrepanciesbetweenlegtolegbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisandcomputerizedtomographyinabdominalvisceralfatmeasurement AT chenyuyawn discrepanciesbetweenlegtolegbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisandcomputerizedtomographyinabdominalvisceralfatmeasurement AT yehchinagwen discrepanciesbetweenlegtolegbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisandcomputerizedtomographyinabdominalvisceralfatmeasurement AT chuangchihlin discrepanciesbetweenlegtolegbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisandcomputerizedtomographyinabdominalvisceralfatmeasurement AT chiangliming discrepanciesbetweenlegtolegbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisandcomputerizedtomographyinabdominalvisceralfatmeasurement AT laichungliang discrepanciesbetweenlegtolegbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisandcomputerizedtomographyinabdominalvisceralfatmeasurement AT caseboltkevinm discrepanciesbetweenlegtolegbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisandcomputerizedtomographyinabdominalvisceralfatmeasurement AT huangaichun discrepanciesbetweenlegtolegbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisandcomputerizedtomographyinabdominalvisceralfatmeasurement AT linwenlong discrepanciesbetweenlegtolegbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisandcomputerizedtomographyinabdominalvisceralfatmeasurement AT hsiehkuenchang discrepanciesbetweenlegtolegbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisandcomputerizedtomographyinabdominalvisceralfatmeasurement |