Cargando…

Discrepancies between leg-to-leg bioelectrical Impedance analysis and computerized tomography in abdominal visceral fat measurement

The aim of this study was to evaluate leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance analysis (LBIA) using a four-contact electrode system for measuring abdominal visceral fat area (VFA). The present study recruited 381 (240 male and 141 female) Chinese participants to compare VFA measurements estimated by a st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Hsueh-Kuan, Chen, Yu-Yawn, Yeh, Chinagwen, Chuang, Chih-Lin, Chiang, Li-Ming, Lai, Chung-Liang, Casebolt, Kevin M., Huang, Ai-Chun, Lin, Wen-Long, Hsieh, Kuen-Chang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5567333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28831095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08991-y
_version_ 1783258709320794112
author Lu, Hsueh-Kuan
Chen, Yu-Yawn
Yeh, Chinagwen
Chuang, Chih-Lin
Chiang, Li-Ming
Lai, Chung-Liang
Casebolt, Kevin M.
Huang, Ai-Chun
Lin, Wen-Long
Hsieh, Kuen-Chang
author_facet Lu, Hsueh-Kuan
Chen, Yu-Yawn
Yeh, Chinagwen
Chuang, Chih-Lin
Chiang, Li-Ming
Lai, Chung-Liang
Casebolt, Kevin M.
Huang, Ai-Chun
Lin, Wen-Long
Hsieh, Kuen-Chang
author_sort Lu, Hsueh-Kuan
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to evaluate leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance analysis (LBIA) using a four-contact electrode system for measuring abdominal visceral fat area (VFA). The present study recruited 381 (240 male and 141 female) Chinese participants to compare VFA measurements estimated by a standing LBIA system (VFALBIA) with computerized tomography (CT) scanned at the L4-L5 vertebrae (VFA(CT)). The total mean body mass index (BMI) was 24.7 ± 4.2 kg/m(2). Correlation analysis, regression analysis, Bland-Altman plot, and paired sample t-tests were used to analyze the accuracy of the VFA(LBIA). For the total subjects, the regression line was VFA(LBIA) = 0.698 VFA(CT) + 29.521, (correlation coefficient (r) = 0.789, standard estimate of error (SEE) = 24.470 cm(2), p < 0.001), Lin’s correlation coefficient (CCC) was 0.785; and the limit of agreement (LOA; mean difference ±2 standard deviation) ranged from −43.950 to 67.951 cm(2), LOA% (given as a percentage of mean value measured by the CT) was 48.2%. VFA(LBIA) and VFA(CT) showed significant difference (p < 0.001). Collectively, the current study indicates that LBIA has limited potential to accurately estimate visceral fat in a clinical setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5567333
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55673332017-09-01 Discrepancies between leg-to-leg bioelectrical Impedance analysis and computerized tomography in abdominal visceral fat measurement Lu, Hsueh-Kuan Chen, Yu-Yawn Yeh, Chinagwen Chuang, Chih-Lin Chiang, Li-Ming Lai, Chung-Liang Casebolt, Kevin M. Huang, Ai-Chun Lin, Wen-Long Hsieh, Kuen-Chang Sci Rep Article The aim of this study was to evaluate leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance analysis (LBIA) using a four-contact electrode system for measuring abdominal visceral fat area (VFA). The present study recruited 381 (240 male and 141 female) Chinese participants to compare VFA measurements estimated by a standing LBIA system (VFALBIA) with computerized tomography (CT) scanned at the L4-L5 vertebrae (VFA(CT)). The total mean body mass index (BMI) was 24.7 ± 4.2 kg/m(2). Correlation analysis, regression analysis, Bland-Altman plot, and paired sample t-tests were used to analyze the accuracy of the VFA(LBIA). For the total subjects, the regression line was VFA(LBIA) = 0.698 VFA(CT) + 29.521, (correlation coefficient (r) = 0.789, standard estimate of error (SEE) = 24.470 cm(2), p < 0.001), Lin’s correlation coefficient (CCC) was 0.785; and the limit of agreement (LOA; mean difference ±2 standard deviation) ranged from −43.950 to 67.951 cm(2), LOA% (given as a percentage of mean value measured by the CT) was 48.2%. VFA(LBIA) and VFA(CT) showed significant difference (p < 0.001). Collectively, the current study indicates that LBIA has limited potential to accurately estimate visceral fat in a clinical setting. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5567333/ /pubmed/28831095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08991-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Lu, Hsueh-Kuan
Chen, Yu-Yawn
Yeh, Chinagwen
Chuang, Chih-Lin
Chiang, Li-Ming
Lai, Chung-Liang
Casebolt, Kevin M.
Huang, Ai-Chun
Lin, Wen-Long
Hsieh, Kuen-Chang
Discrepancies between leg-to-leg bioelectrical Impedance analysis and computerized tomography in abdominal visceral fat measurement
title Discrepancies between leg-to-leg bioelectrical Impedance analysis and computerized tomography in abdominal visceral fat measurement
title_full Discrepancies between leg-to-leg bioelectrical Impedance analysis and computerized tomography in abdominal visceral fat measurement
title_fullStr Discrepancies between leg-to-leg bioelectrical Impedance analysis and computerized tomography in abdominal visceral fat measurement
title_full_unstemmed Discrepancies between leg-to-leg bioelectrical Impedance analysis and computerized tomography in abdominal visceral fat measurement
title_short Discrepancies between leg-to-leg bioelectrical Impedance analysis and computerized tomography in abdominal visceral fat measurement
title_sort discrepancies between leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance analysis and computerized tomography in abdominal visceral fat measurement
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5567333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28831095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08991-y
work_keys_str_mv AT luhsuehkuan discrepanciesbetweenlegtolegbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisandcomputerizedtomographyinabdominalvisceralfatmeasurement
AT chenyuyawn discrepanciesbetweenlegtolegbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisandcomputerizedtomographyinabdominalvisceralfatmeasurement
AT yehchinagwen discrepanciesbetweenlegtolegbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisandcomputerizedtomographyinabdominalvisceralfatmeasurement
AT chuangchihlin discrepanciesbetweenlegtolegbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisandcomputerizedtomographyinabdominalvisceralfatmeasurement
AT chiangliming discrepanciesbetweenlegtolegbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisandcomputerizedtomographyinabdominalvisceralfatmeasurement
AT laichungliang discrepanciesbetweenlegtolegbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisandcomputerizedtomographyinabdominalvisceralfatmeasurement
AT caseboltkevinm discrepanciesbetweenlegtolegbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisandcomputerizedtomographyinabdominalvisceralfatmeasurement
AT huangaichun discrepanciesbetweenlegtolegbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisandcomputerizedtomographyinabdominalvisceralfatmeasurement
AT linwenlong discrepanciesbetweenlegtolegbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisandcomputerizedtomographyinabdominalvisceralfatmeasurement
AT hsiehkuenchang discrepanciesbetweenlegtolegbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisandcomputerizedtomographyinabdominalvisceralfatmeasurement