Cargando…

Spatial mapping of humeral head bone density

BACKGROUND: Short-stem humeral replacements achieve fixation by anchoring to the metaphyseal trabecular bone. Fixing the implant in high-density bone can provide strong fixation and reduce the risk of loosening. However, there is a lack of data mapping the bone density distribution in the proximal h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alidousti, Hamidreza, Giles, Joshua W., Emery, Roger J.H., Jeffers, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mosby 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5567411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28495573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.03.006
_version_ 1783258728181530624
author Alidousti, Hamidreza
Giles, Joshua W.
Emery, Roger J.H.
Jeffers, Jonathan
author_facet Alidousti, Hamidreza
Giles, Joshua W.
Emery, Roger J.H.
Jeffers, Jonathan
author_sort Alidousti, Hamidreza
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Short-stem humeral replacements achieve fixation by anchoring to the metaphyseal trabecular bone. Fixing the implant in high-density bone can provide strong fixation and reduce the risk of loosening. However, there is a lack of data mapping the bone density distribution in the proximal humerus. The aim of the study was to investigate the bone density in proximal humerus. METHODS: Eight computed tomography scans of healthy cadaveric humeri were used to map bone density distribution in the humeral head. The proximal humeral head was divided into 12 slices parallel to the humeral anatomic neck. Each slice was then divided into 4 concentric circles. The slices below the anatomic neck, where short-stem implants have their fixation features, were further divided into radial sectors. The average bone density for each of these regions was calculated, and regions of interest were compared using a repeated-measures analysis of variance with significance set at P < .05. RESULTS: Average apparent bone density was found to decrease from proximal to distal regions, with the majority of higher bone density proximal to the anatomic neck of the humerus (P < .05). Below the anatomic neck, bone density increases from central to peripheral regions, where cortical bone eventually occupies the space (P < .05). In distal slices below the anatomic neck, a higher bone density distribution in the medial calcar region was also observed. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that it is advantageous with respect to implant fixation to preserve some bone above the anatomic neck and epiphyseal plate and to use the denser bone at the periphery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5567411
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Mosby
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55674112017-09-01 Spatial mapping of humeral head bone density Alidousti, Hamidreza Giles, Joshua W. Emery, Roger J.H. Jeffers, Jonathan J Shoulder Elbow Surg Article BACKGROUND: Short-stem humeral replacements achieve fixation by anchoring to the metaphyseal trabecular bone. Fixing the implant in high-density bone can provide strong fixation and reduce the risk of loosening. However, there is a lack of data mapping the bone density distribution in the proximal humerus. The aim of the study was to investigate the bone density in proximal humerus. METHODS: Eight computed tomography scans of healthy cadaveric humeri were used to map bone density distribution in the humeral head. The proximal humeral head was divided into 12 slices parallel to the humeral anatomic neck. Each slice was then divided into 4 concentric circles. The slices below the anatomic neck, where short-stem implants have their fixation features, were further divided into radial sectors. The average bone density for each of these regions was calculated, and regions of interest were compared using a repeated-measures analysis of variance with significance set at P < .05. RESULTS: Average apparent bone density was found to decrease from proximal to distal regions, with the majority of higher bone density proximal to the anatomic neck of the humerus (P < .05). Below the anatomic neck, bone density increases from central to peripheral regions, where cortical bone eventually occupies the space (P < .05). In distal slices below the anatomic neck, a higher bone density distribution in the medial calcar region was also observed. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that it is advantageous with respect to implant fixation to preserve some bone above the anatomic neck and epiphyseal plate and to use the denser bone at the periphery. Mosby 2017-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5567411/ /pubmed/28495573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.03.006 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Alidousti, Hamidreza
Giles, Joshua W.
Emery, Roger J.H.
Jeffers, Jonathan
Spatial mapping of humeral head bone density
title Spatial mapping of humeral head bone density
title_full Spatial mapping of humeral head bone density
title_fullStr Spatial mapping of humeral head bone density
title_full_unstemmed Spatial mapping of humeral head bone density
title_short Spatial mapping of humeral head bone density
title_sort spatial mapping of humeral head bone density
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5567411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28495573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.03.006
work_keys_str_mv AT alidoustihamidreza spatialmappingofhumeralheadbonedensity
AT gilesjoshuaw spatialmappingofhumeralheadbonedensity
AT emeryrogerjh spatialmappingofhumeralheadbonedensity
AT jeffersjonathan spatialmappingofhumeralheadbonedensity