Cargando…
The Role of Three-Dimensional Scaffolds in Treating Long Bone Defects: Evidence from Preclinical and Clinical Literature—A Systematic Review
Long bone defects represent a clinical challenge. Bone tissue engineering (BTE) has been developed to overcome problems associated with conventional methods. The aim of this study was to assess the BTE strategies available in preclinical and clinical settings and the current evidence supporting this...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5567443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28852649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8074178 |
_version_ | 1783258733321650176 |
---|---|
author | Roffi, Alice Krishnakumar, Gopal Shankar Gostynska, Natalia Kon, Elizaveta Candrian, Christian Filardo, Giuseppe |
author_facet | Roffi, Alice Krishnakumar, Gopal Shankar Gostynska, Natalia Kon, Elizaveta Candrian, Christian Filardo, Giuseppe |
author_sort | Roffi, Alice |
collection | PubMed |
description | Long bone defects represent a clinical challenge. Bone tissue engineering (BTE) has been developed to overcome problems associated with conventional methods. The aim of this study was to assess the BTE strategies available in preclinical and clinical settings and the current evidence supporting this approach. A systematic literature screening was performed on PubMed database, searching for both preclinical (only on large animals) and clinical studies. The following string was used: “(Scaffold OR Implant) AND (Long bone defect OR segmental bone defect OR large bone defect OR bone loss defect).” The search retrieved a total of 1573 articles: 51 preclinical and 4 clinical studies were included. The great amount of preclinical papers published over the past few years showed promising findings in terms of radiological and histological evidence. Unfortunately, this in vivo situation is not reflected by a corresponding clinical impact, with few published papers, highly heterogeneous and with small patient populations. Several aspects should be further investigated to translate positive preclinical findings into clinical protocols: the identification of the best biomaterial, with both biological and biomechanical suitable properties, and the selection of the best choice between cells, GFs, or their combination through standardized models to be validated by randomized trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5567443 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55674432017-08-29 The Role of Three-Dimensional Scaffolds in Treating Long Bone Defects: Evidence from Preclinical and Clinical Literature—A Systematic Review Roffi, Alice Krishnakumar, Gopal Shankar Gostynska, Natalia Kon, Elizaveta Candrian, Christian Filardo, Giuseppe Biomed Res Int Review Article Long bone defects represent a clinical challenge. Bone tissue engineering (BTE) has been developed to overcome problems associated with conventional methods. The aim of this study was to assess the BTE strategies available in preclinical and clinical settings and the current evidence supporting this approach. A systematic literature screening was performed on PubMed database, searching for both preclinical (only on large animals) and clinical studies. The following string was used: “(Scaffold OR Implant) AND (Long bone defect OR segmental bone defect OR large bone defect OR bone loss defect).” The search retrieved a total of 1573 articles: 51 preclinical and 4 clinical studies were included. The great amount of preclinical papers published over the past few years showed promising findings in terms of radiological and histological evidence. Unfortunately, this in vivo situation is not reflected by a corresponding clinical impact, with few published papers, highly heterogeneous and with small patient populations. Several aspects should be further investigated to translate positive preclinical findings into clinical protocols: the identification of the best biomaterial, with both biological and biomechanical suitable properties, and the selection of the best choice between cells, GFs, or their combination through standardized models to be validated by randomized trials. Hindawi 2017 2017-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5567443/ /pubmed/28852649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8074178 Text en Copyright © 2017 Alice Roffi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Roffi, Alice Krishnakumar, Gopal Shankar Gostynska, Natalia Kon, Elizaveta Candrian, Christian Filardo, Giuseppe The Role of Three-Dimensional Scaffolds in Treating Long Bone Defects: Evidence from Preclinical and Clinical Literature—A Systematic Review |
title | The Role of Three-Dimensional Scaffolds in Treating Long Bone Defects: Evidence from Preclinical and Clinical Literature—A Systematic Review |
title_full | The Role of Three-Dimensional Scaffolds in Treating Long Bone Defects: Evidence from Preclinical and Clinical Literature—A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | The Role of Three-Dimensional Scaffolds in Treating Long Bone Defects: Evidence from Preclinical and Clinical Literature—A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | The Role of Three-Dimensional Scaffolds in Treating Long Bone Defects: Evidence from Preclinical and Clinical Literature—A Systematic Review |
title_short | The Role of Three-Dimensional Scaffolds in Treating Long Bone Defects: Evidence from Preclinical and Clinical Literature—A Systematic Review |
title_sort | role of three-dimensional scaffolds in treating long bone defects: evidence from preclinical and clinical literature—a systematic review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5567443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28852649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8074178 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT roffialice theroleofthreedimensionalscaffoldsintreatinglongbonedefectsevidencefrompreclinicalandclinicalliteratureasystematicreview AT krishnakumargopalshankar theroleofthreedimensionalscaffoldsintreatinglongbonedefectsevidencefrompreclinicalandclinicalliteratureasystematicreview AT gostynskanatalia theroleofthreedimensionalscaffoldsintreatinglongbonedefectsevidencefrompreclinicalandclinicalliteratureasystematicreview AT konelizaveta theroleofthreedimensionalscaffoldsintreatinglongbonedefectsevidencefrompreclinicalandclinicalliteratureasystematicreview AT candrianchristian theroleofthreedimensionalscaffoldsintreatinglongbonedefectsevidencefrompreclinicalandclinicalliteratureasystematicreview AT filardogiuseppe theroleofthreedimensionalscaffoldsintreatinglongbonedefectsevidencefrompreclinicalandclinicalliteratureasystematicreview AT roffialice roleofthreedimensionalscaffoldsintreatinglongbonedefectsevidencefrompreclinicalandclinicalliteratureasystematicreview AT krishnakumargopalshankar roleofthreedimensionalscaffoldsintreatinglongbonedefectsevidencefrompreclinicalandclinicalliteratureasystematicreview AT gostynskanatalia roleofthreedimensionalscaffoldsintreatinglongbonedefectsevidencefrompreclinicalandclinicalliteratureasystematicreview AT konelizaveta roleofthreedimensionalscaffoldsintreatinglongbonedefectsevidencefrompreclinicalandclinicalliteratureasystematicreview AT candrianchristian roleofthreedimensionalscaffoldsintreatinglongbonedefectsevidencefrompreclinicalandclinicalliteratureasystematicreview AT filardogiuseppe roleofthreedimensionalscaffoldsintreatinglongbonedefectsevidencefrompreclinicalandclinicalliteratureasystematicreview |