Cargando…

The Role of Three-Dimensional Scaffolds in Treating Long Bone Defects: Evidence from Preclinical and Clinical Literature—A Systematic Review

Long bone defects represent a clinical challenge. Bone tissue engineering (BTE) has been developed to overcome problems associated with conventional methods. The aim of this study was to assess the BTE strategies available in preclinical and clinical settings and the current evidence supporting this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roffi, Alice, Krishnakumar, Gopal Shankar, Gostynska, Natalia, Kon, Elizaveta, Candrian, Christian, Filardo, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5567443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28852649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8074178
_version_ 1783258733321650176
author Roffi, Alice
Krishnakumar, Gopal Shankar
Gostynska, Natalia
Kon, Elizaveta
Candrian, Christian
Filardo, Giuseppe
author_facet Roffi, Alice
Krishnakumar, Gopal Shankar
Gostynska, Natalia
Kon, Elizaveta
Candrian, Christian
Filardo, Giuseppe
author_sort Roffi, Alice
collection PubMed
description Long bone defects represent a clinical challenge. Bone tissue engineering (BTE) has been developed to overcome problems associated with conventional methods. The aim of this study was to assess the BTE strategies available in preclinical and clinical settings and the current evidence supporting this approach. A systematic literature screening was performed on PubMed database, searching for both preclinical (only on large animals) and clinical studies. The following string was used: “(Scaffold OR Implant) AND (Long bone defect OR segmental bone defect OR large bone defect OR bone loss defect).” The search retrieved a total of 1573 articles: 51 preclinical and 4 clinical studies were included. The great amount of preclinical papers published over the past few years showed promising findings in terms of radiological and histological evidence. Unfortunately, this in vivo situation is not reflected by a corresponding clinical impact, with few published papers, highly heterogeneous and with small patient populations. Several aspects should be further investigated to translate positive preclinical findings into clinical protocols: the identification of the best biomaterial, with both biological and biomechanical suitable properties, and the selection of the best choice between cells, GFs, or their combination through standardized models to be validated by randomized trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5567443
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55674432017-08-29 The Role of Three-Dimensional Scaffolds in Treating Long Bone Defects: Evidence from Preclinical and Clinical Literature—A Systematic Review Roffi, Alice Krishnakumar, Gopal Shankar Gostynska, Natalia Kon, Elizaveta Candrian, Christian Filardo, Giuseppe Biomed Res Int Review Article Long bone defects represent a clinical challenge. Bone tissue engineering (BTE) has been developed to overcome problems associated with conventional methods. The aim of this study was to assess the BTE strategies available in preclinical and clinical settings and the current evidence supporting this approach. A systematic literature screening was performed on PubMed database, searching for both preclinical (only on large animals) and clinical studies. The following string was used: “(Scaffold OR Implant) AND (Long bone defect OR segmental bone defect OR large bone defect OR bone loss defect).” The search retrieved a total of 1573 articles: 51 preclinical and 4 clinical studies were included. The great amount of preclinical papers published over the past few years showed promising findings in terms of radiological and histological evidence. Unfortunately, this in vivo situation is not reflected by a corresponding clinical impact, with few published papers, highly heterogeneous and with small patient populations. Several aspects should be further investigated to translate positive preclinical findings into clinical protocols: the identification of the best biomaterial, with both biological and biomechanical suitable properties, and the selection of the best choice between cells, GFs, or their combination through standardized models to be validated by randomized trials. Hindawi 2017 2017-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5567443/ /pubmed/28852649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8074178 Text en Copyright © 2017 Alice Roffi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Roffi, Alice
Krishnakumar, Gopal Shankar
Gostynska, Natalia
Kon, Elizaveta
Candrian, Christian
Filardo, Giuseppe
The Role of Three-Dimensional Scaffolds in Treating Long Bone Defects: Evidence from Preclinical and Clinical Literature—A Systematic Review
title The Role of Three-Dimensional Scaffolds in Treating Long Bone Defects: Evidence from Preclinical and Clinical Literature—A Systematic Review
title_full The Role of Three-Dimensional Scaffolds in Treating Long Bone Defects: Evidence from Preclinical and Clinical Literature—A Systematic Review
title_fullStr The Role of Three-Dimensional Scaffolds in Treating Long Bone Defects: Evidence from Preclinical and Clinical Literature—A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Three-Dimensional Scaffolds in Treating Long Bone Defects: Evidence from Preclinical and Clinical Literature—A Systematic Review
title_short The Role of Three-Dimensional Scaffolds in Treating Long Bone Defects: Evidence from Preclinical and Clinical Literature—A Systematic Review
title_sort role of three-dimensional scaffolds in treating long bone defects: evidence from preclinical and clinical literature—a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5567443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28852649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8074178
work_keys_str_mv AT roffialice theroleofthreedimensionalscaffoldsintreatinglongbonedefectsevidencefrompreclinicalandclinicalliteratureasystematicreview
AT krishnakumargopalshankar theroleofthreedimensionalscaffoldsintreatinglongbonedefectsevidencefrompreclinicalandclinicalliteratureasystematicreview
AT gostynskanatalia theroleofthreedimensionalscaffoldsintreatinglongbonedefectsevidencefrompreclinicalandclinicalliteratureasystematicreview
AT konelizaveta theroleofthreedimensionalscaffoldsintreatinglongbonedefectsevidencefrompreclinicalandclinicalliteratureasystematicreview
AT candrianchristian theroleofthreedimensionalscaffoldsintreatinglongbonedefectsevidencefrompreclinicalandclinicalliteratureasystematicreview
AT filardogiuseppe theroleofthreedimensionalscaffoldsintreatinglongbonedefectsevidencefrompreclinicalandclinicalliteratureasystematicreview
AT roffialice roleofthreedimensionalscaffoldsintreatinglongbonedefectsevidencefrompreclinicalandclinicalliteratureasystematicreview
AT krishnakumargopalshankar roleofthreedimensionalscaffoldsintreatinglongbonedefectsevidencefrompreclinicalandclinicalliteratureasystematicreview
AT gostynskanatalia roleofthreedimensionalscaffoldsintreatinglongbonedefectsevidencefrompreclinicalandclinicalliteratureasystematicreview
AT konelizaveta roleofthreedimensionalscaffoldsintreatinglongbonedefectsevidencefrompreclinicalandclinicalliteratureasystematicreview
AT candrianchristian roleofthreedimensionalscaffoldsintreatinglongbonedefectsevidencefrompreclinicalandclinicalliteratureasystematicreview
AT filardogiuseppe roleofthreedimensionalscaffoldsintreatinglongbonedefectsevidencefrompreclinicalandclinicalliteratureasystematicreview