Cargando…

Treatment of mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome in patients with diabetic neuropathy using low level laser therapy versus ultrasound controlled comparative study

AIM: The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare between Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) and Ultrasound (US) in treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) using the advantage of application of treatment directly over the transverse carpal ligament, as well as over the course of the med...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmed, Osama F., Elkharbotly, Ahmed M., Taha, Nahed, Bekheet, Ahmed B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5567639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28856107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbacli.2017.07.001
_version_ 1783258755040804864
author Ahmed, Osama F.
Elkharbotly, Ahmed M.
Taha, Nahed
Bekheet, Ahmed B.
author_facet Ahmed, Osama F.
Elkharbotly, Ahmed M.
Taha, Nahed
Bekheet, Ahmed B.
author_sort Ahmed, Osama F.
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare between Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) and Ultrasound (US) in treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) using the advantage of application of treatment directly over the transverse carpal ligament, as well as over the course of the median nerve in the forearm simultaneously. DESIGN: Fifty patients (25–55 years) with diabetic neuropathy, diagnosed as unilateral carpal tunnel syndrome participated in the study. They were equally divided and randomly assigned into two groups; each group consisted of 25 patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients in group (A) received a program of IR Gallium Arsenide LLLT (wavelength 904 nm, average power 20 mW, laser probe 7 mm diameter), with a total application of 4.8 J, while patients in group (B) received a program of US (frequency 1 MHz, power 1.0 W/cm(2), pulsed mode 1:5). RESULTS & DISCUSSION: The results of our study showed that there were no statistical significance differences (P > 0.05) were observed between the two groups. It was concluded that both low level laser (20 mW power, 904 nm Wavelength) and ultrasound (1.0 w/cm(2) power, 1 MHz frequency) are effective in the treatment of mild and moderate CTS patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5567639
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55676392017-08-30 Treatment of mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome in patients with diabetic neuropathy using low level laser therapy versus ultrasound controlled comparative study Ahmed, Osama F. Elkharbotly, Ahmed M. Taha, Nahed Bekheet, Ahmed B. BBA Clin Regular Article AIM: The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare between Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) and Ultrasound (US) in treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) using the advantage of application of treatment directly over the transverse carpal ligament, as well as over the course of the median nerve in the forearm simultaneously. DESIGN: Fifty patients (25–55 years) with diabetic neuropathy, diagnosed as unilateral carpal tunnel syndrome participated in the study. They were equally divided and randomly assigned into two groups; each group consisted of 25 patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients in group (A) received a program of IR Gallium Arsenide LLLT (wavelength 904 nm, average power 20 mW, laser probe 7 mm diameter), with a total application of 4.8 J, while patients in group (B) received a program of US (frequency 1 MHz, power 1.0 W/cm(2), pulsed mode 1:5). RESULTS & DISCUSSION: The results of our study showed that there were no statistical significance differences (P > 0.05) were observed between the two groups. It was concluded that both low level laser (20 mW power, 904 nm Wavelength) and ultrasound (1.0 w/cm(2) power, 1 MHz frequency) are effective in the treatment of mild and moderate CTS patients. Elsevier 2017-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5567639/ /pubmed/28856107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbacli.2017.07.001 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Regular Article
Ahmed, Osama F.
Elkharbotly, Ahmed M.
Taha, Nahed
Bekheet, Ahmed B.
Treatment of mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome in patients with diabetic neuropathy using low level laser therapy versus ultrasound controlled comparative study
title Treatment of mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome in patients with diabetic neuropathy using low level laser therapy versus ultrasound controlled comparative study
title_full Treatment of mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome in patients with diabetic neuropathy using low level laser therapy versus ultrasound controlled comparative study
title_fullStr Treatment of mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome in patients with diabetic neuropathy using low level laser therapy versus ultrasound controlled comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome in patients with diabetic neuropathy using low level laser therapy versus ultrasound controlled comparative study
title_short Treatment of mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome in patients with diabetic neuropathy using low level laser therapy versus ultrasound controlled comparative study
title_sort treatment of mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome in patients with diabetic neuropathy using low level laser therapy versus ultrasound controlled comparative study
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5567639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28856107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbacli.2017.07.001
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedosamaf treatmentofmildtomoderatecarpaltunnelsyndromeinpatientswithdiabeticneuropathyusinglowlevellasertherapyversusultrasoundcontrolledcomparativestudy
AT elkharbotlyahmedm treatmentofmildtomoderatecarpaltunnelsyndromeinpatientswithdiabeticneuropathyusinglowlevellasertherapyversusultrasoundcontrolledcomparativestudy
AT tahanahed treatmentofmildtomoderatecarpaltunnelsyndromeinpatientswithdiabeticneuropathyusinglowlevellasertherapyversusultrasoundcontrolledcomparativestudy
AT bekheetahmedb treatmentofmildtomoderatecarpaltunnelsyndromeinpatientswithdiabeticneuropathyusinglowlevellasertherapyversusultrasoundcontrolledcomparativestudy