Cargando…

Unsatisfactory colposcopy: clinical decision-making in conditions of uncertainty

BACKGROUND: Unsatisfactory colposcopy, where the cells of interest are not visible in women with a positive cervical screening test, is a common area of clinical uncertainty due to the lack of clear evidence and guidance. Colposcopists’ opinions and experiences are likely to have a significant influ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manley, Kristyn M., Simms, Rebecca A., Platt, Sarah, Patel, Amit, Bahl, Rachna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5567663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28830493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-017-0516-3
_version_ 1783258761013493760
author Manley, Kristyn M.
Simms, Rebecca A.
Platt, Sarah
Patel, Amit
Bahl, Rachna
author_facet Manley, Kristyn M.
Simms, Rebecca A.
Platt, Sarah
Patel, Amit
Bahl, Rachna
author_sort Manley, Kristyn M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Unsatisfactory colposcopy, where the cells of interest are not visible in women with a positive cervical screening test, is a common area of clinical uncertainty due to the lack of clear evidence and guidance. Colposcopists’ opinions and experiences are likely to have a significant influence on service provision and the development of national policy. The aim of this study was to analyse decision-making when applied to women with unsatisfactory colposcopy. METHODS: A multi-centre qualitative study utilizing a series of focus groups in an English healthcare region. Sampling aimed to ensure heterogeneity of experience and healthcare provider demographics. A topic guide covered a range of clinical and cytological variables and was compiled by the researchers and three expert Colposcopists. Using an iterative approach, thematic analysis was selected as the most appropriate method to identify factors affecting decision-making. RESULTS: Twenty-three Colposcopists from four units participated. The decision to treat was easier in women with high-grade cytology and high risk women with low-grade cytology such as heavy smokers, poor attenders, older women, those who had completed their families and women opting for treatment. Where decision-making was more complex, intuition and a multi-disciplinary approach were used to guide management. Areas of dissonance, which are affected by paucity of evidence and emotive factors, included cytological collection device, clinical setting and length of conservative follow-up and depth of excision in women at high risk of treatment-related morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Anxiety of missing a cancer deters long-term cytological follow-up, resulting in heterogeneity of care and higher than anticipated excisional treatments in women with low-grade screening and unsatisfactory colposcopy. In areas of clinical uncertainty when decisions are dominated by affect, clinical guidance can reduce the difficulty and anxiety of decision-making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5567663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55676632017-08-29 Unsatisfactory colposcopy: clinical decision-making in conditions of uncertainty Manley, Kristyn M. Simms, Rebecca A. Platt, Sarah Patel, Amit Bahl, Rachna BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Unsatisfactory colposcopy, where the cells of interest are not visible in women with a positive cervical screening test, is a common area of clinical uncertainty due to the lack of clear evidence and guidance. Colposcopists’ opinions and experiences are likely to have a significant influence on service provision and the development of national policy. The aim of this study was to analyse decision-making when applied to women with unsatisfactory colposcopy. METHODS: A multi-centre qualitative study utilizing a series of focus groups in an English healthcare region. Sampling aimed to ensure heterogeneity of experience and healthcare provider demographics. A topic guide covered a range of clinical and cytological variables and was compiled by the researchers and three expert Colposcopists. Using an iterative approach, thematic analysis was selected as the most appropriate method to identify factors affecting decision-making. RESULTS: Twenty-three Colposcopists from four units participated. The decision to treat was easier in women with high-grade cytology and high risk women with low-grade cytology such as heavy smokers, poor attenders, older women, those who had completed their families and women opting for treatment. Where decision-making was more complex, intuition and a multi-disciplinary approach were used to guide management. Areas of dissonance, which are affected by paucity of evidence and emotive factors, included cytological collection device, clinical setting and length of conservative follow-up and depth of excision in women at high risk of treatment-related morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Anxiety of missing a cancer deters long-term cytological follow-up, resulting in heterogeneity of care and higher than anticipated excisional treatments in women with low-grade screening and unsatisfactory colposcopy. In areas of clinical uncertainty when decisions are dominated by affect, clinical guidance can reduce the difficulty and anxiety of decision-making. BioMed Central 2017-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5567663/ /pubmed/28830493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-017-0516-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Manley, Kristyn M.
Simms, Rebecca A.
Platt, Sarah
Patel, Amit
Bahl, Rachna
Unsatisfactory colposcopy: clinical decision-making in conditions of uncertainty
title Unsatisfactory colposcopy: clinical decision-making in conditions of uncertainty
title_full Unsatisfactory colposcopy: clinical decision-making in conditions of uncertainty
title_fullStr Unsatisfactory colposcopy: clinical decision-making in conditions of uncertainty
title_full_unstemmed Unsatisfactory colposcopy: clinical decision-making in conditions of uncertainty
title_short Unsatisfactory colposcopy: clinical decision-making in conditions of uncertainty
title_sort unsatisfactory colposcopy: clinical decision-making in conditions of uncertainty
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5567663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28830493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-017-0516-3
work_keys_str_mv AT manleykristynm unsatisfactorycolposcopyclinicaldecisionmakinginconditionsofuncertainty
AT simmsrebeccaa unsatisfactorycolposcopyclinicaldecisionmakinginconditionsofuncertainty
AT plattsarah unsatisfactorycolposcopyclinicaldecisionmakinginconditionsofuncertainty
AT patelamit unsatisfactorycolposcopyclinicaldecisionmakinginconditionsofuncertainty
AT bahlrachna unsatisfactorycolposcopyclinicaldecisionmakinginconditionsofuncertainty