Cargando…

Accuracy of a Fourth-Generation Subcutaneous Continuous Glucose Sensor

Background: This study evaluated the accuracy and performance of a fourth-generation subcutaneous glucose sensor (Guardian(™) Sensor 3) in the abdomen and arm. Methods: Eighty-eight subjects (14–75 years of age, mean ± standard deviation [SD] of 42.0 ± 19.1 years) with type 1 or type 2 diabetes part...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christiansen, Mark P., Garg, Satish K., Brazg, Ronald, Bode, Bruce W., Bailey, Timothy S., Slover, Robert H., Sullivan, Ashley, Huang, Suiying, Shin, John, Lee, Scott W., Kaufman, Francine R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5567873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28700272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2017.0087
_version_ 1783258767338504192
author Christiansen, Mark P.
Garg, Satish K.
Brazg, Ronald
Bode, Bruce W.
Bailey, Timothy S.
Slover, Robert H.
Sullivan, Ashley
Huang, Suiying
Shin, John
Lee, Scott W.
Kaufman, Francine R.
author_facet Christiansen, Mark P.
Garg, Satish K.
Brazg, Ronald
Bode, Bruce W.
Bailey, Timothy S.
Slover, Robert H.
Sullivan, Ashley
Huang, Suiying
Shin, John
Lee, Scott W.
Kaufman, Francine R.
author_sort Christiansen, Mark P.
collection PubMed
description Background: This study evaluated the accuracy and performance of a fourth-generation subcutaneous glucose sensor (Guardian(™) Sensor 3) in the abdomen and arm. Methods: Eighty-eight subjects (14–75 years of age, mean ± standard deviation [SD] of 42.0 ± 19.1 years) with type 1 or type 2 diabetes participated in the study. Subjects wore two sensors in the abdomen that were paired with either a MiniMed(™) 640G insulin pump, or an iPhone(®) or iPod(®) touch(®) running a glucose monitoring mobile application (Guardian Connect system) and a third sensor in the arm, which was connected to a glucose sensor recorder (GSR). Subjects were also asked to undergo in-clinic visits of 12–14 h on study days 1, 3, and 7 for frequent blood glucose sample testing using a Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI) reference. Results: The overall mean absolute relative difference (MARD ± SD) between abdomen sensor glucose (SG) and YSI reference values was 9.6% ± 9.0% and 9.4% ± 9.8% for the MiniMed 640G insulin pump and Guardian Connect system, respectively; and 8.7% ± 8.0% between arm SG and YSI reference values. The percentage of SG values within 20% agreement of the YSI reference value (for YSI >80 mg/dL) was 90.7% with the MiniMed 640G insulin pump, 91.8% with the Guardian Connect system, and 93.1% for GSR-connected arm sensors. Mean functional sensor life, when calibrating 3–4 times/day, was 145.9 ± 39.3 h for sensors paired with the MiniMed 640G insulin pump, 146.1 ± 41.6 h for sensors paired with the Guardian Connect system, and 147.6 ± 40.4 h for sensors connected to the GSR. Responses to survey questions regarding sensor comfort and ease of use were favorable. Conclusions: The Guardian Sensor 3 glucose sensor, whether located in abdomen or the arm, provided accurate glucose readings when compared with the YSI reference and demonstrated functional life commensurate with the intended 7-day use. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02246582
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5567873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55678732017-08-30 Accuracy of a Fourth-Generation Subcutaneous Continuous Glucose Sensor Christiansen, Mark P. Garg, Satish K. Brazg, Ronald Bode, Bruce W. Bailey, Timothy S. Slover, Robert H. Sullivan, Ashley Huang, Suiying Shin, John Lee, Scott W. Kaufman, Francine R. Diabetes Technol Ther Original Articles Background: This study evaluated the accuracy and performance of a fourth-generation subcutaneous glucose sensor (Guardian(™) Sensor 3) in the abdomen and arm. Methods: Eighty-eight subjects (14–75 years of age, mean ± standard deviation [SD] of 42.0 ± 19.1 years) with type 1 or type 2 diabetes participated in the study. Subjects wore two sensors in the abdomen that were paired with either a MiniMed(™) 640G insulin pump, or an iPhone(®) or iPod(®) touch(®) running a glucose monitoring mobile application (Guardian Connect system) and a third sensor in the arm, which was connected to a glucose sensor recorder (GSR). Subjects were also asked to undergo in-clinic visits of 12–14 h on study days 1, 3, and 7 for frequent blood glucose sample testing using a Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI) reference. Results: The overall mean absolute relative difference (MARD ± SD) between abdomen sensor glucose (SG) and YSI reference values was 9.6% ± 9.0% and 9.4% ± 9.8% for the MiniMed 640G insulin pump and Guardian Connect system, respectively; and 8.7% ± 8.0% between arm SG and YSI reference values. The percentage of SG values within 20% agreement of the YSI reference value (for YSI >80 mg/dL) was 90.7% with the MiniMed 640G insulin pump, 91.8% with the Guardian Connect system, and 93.1% for GSR-connected arm sensors. Mean functional sensor life, when calibrating 3–4 times/day, was 145.9 ± 39.3 h for sensors paired with the MiniMed 640G insulin pump, 146.1 ± 41.6 h for sensors paired with the Guardian Connect system, and 147.6 ± 40.4 h for sensors connected to the GSR. Responses to survey questions regarding sensor comfort and ease of use were favorable. Conclusions: The Guardian Sensor 3 glucose sensor, whether located in abdomen or the arm, provided accurate glucose readings when compared with the YSI reference and demonstrated functional life commensurate with the intended 7-day use. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02246582 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2017-08-01 2017-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5567873/ /pubmed/28700272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2017.0087 Text en © Mark P. Christiansen et al., 2017; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Christiansen, Mark P.
Garg, Satish K.
Brazg, Ronald
Bode, Bruce W.
Bailey, Timothy S.
Slover, Robert H.
Sullivan, Ashley
Huang, Suiying
Shin, John
Lee, Scott W.
Kaufman, Francine R.
Accuracy of a Fourth-Generation Subcutaneous Continuous Glucose Sensor
title Accuracy of a Fourth-Generation Subcutaneous Continuous Glucose Sensor
title_full Accuracy of a Fourth-Generation Subcutaneous Continuous Glucose Sensor
title_fullStr Accuracy of a Fourth-Generation Subcutaneous Continuous Glucose Sensor
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of a Fourth-Generation Subcutaneous Continuous Glucose Sensor
title_short Accuracy of a Fourth-Generation Subcutaneous Continuous Glucose Sensor
title_sort accuracy of a fourth-generation subcutaneous continuous glucose sensor
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5567873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28700272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2017.0087
work_keys_str_mv AT christiansenmarkp accuracyofafourthgenerationsubcutaneouscontinuousglucosesensor
AT gargsatishk accuracyofafourthgenerationsubcutaneouscontinuousglucosesensor
AT brazgronald accuracyofafourthgenerationsubcutaneouscontinuousglucosesensor
AT bodebrucew accuracyofafourthgenerationsubcutaneouscontinuousglucosesensor
AT baileytimothys accuracyofafourthgenerationsubcutaneouscontinuousglucosesensor
AT sloverroberth accuracyofafourthgenerationsubcutaneouscontinuousglucosesensor
AT sullivanashley accuracyofafourthgenerationsubcutaneouscontinuousglucosesensor
AT huangsuiying accuracyofafourthgenerationsubcutaneouscontinuousglucosesensor
AT shinjohn accuracyofafourthgenerationsubcutaneouscontinuousglucosesensor
AT leescottw accuracyofafourthgenerationsubcutaneouscontinuousglucosesensor
AT kaufmanfranciner accuracyofafourthgenerationsubcutaneouscontinuousglucosesensor