Cargando…
Accuracy of a Fourth-Generation Subcutaneous Continuous Glucose Sensor
Background: This study evaluated the accuracy and performance of a fourth-generation subcutaneous glucose sensor (Guardian(™) Sensor 3) in the abdomen and arm. Methods: Eighty-eight subjects (14–75 years of age, mean ± standard deviation [SD] of 42.0 ± 19.1 years) with type 1 or type 2 diabetes part...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5567873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28700272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2017.0087 |
_version_ | 1783258767338504192 |
---|---|
author | Christiansen, Mark P. Garg, Satish K. Brazg, Ronald Bode, Bruce W. Bailey, Timothy S. Slover, Robert H. Sullivan, Ashley Huang, Suiying Shin, John Lee, Scott W. Kaufman, Francine R. |
author_facet | Christiansen, Mark P. Garg, Satish K. Brazg, Ronald Bode, Bruce W. Bailey, Timothy S. Slover, Robert H. Sullivan, Ashley Huang, Suiying Shin, John Lee, Scott W. Kaufman, Francine R. |
author_sort | Christiansen, Mark P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: This study evaluated the accuracy and performance of a fourth-generation subcutaneous glucose sensor (Guardian(™) Sensor 3) in the abdomen and arm. Methods: Eighty-eight subjects (14–75 years of age, mean ± standard deviation [SD] of 42.0 ± 19.1 years) with type 1 or type 2 diabetes participated in the study. Subjects wore two sensors in the abdomen that were paired with either a MiniMed(™) 640G insulin pump, or an iPhone(®) or iPod(®) touch(®) running a glucose monitoring mobile application (Guardian Connect system) and a third sensor in the arm, which was connected to a glucose sensor recorder (GSR). Subjects were also asked to undergo in-clinic visits of 12–14 h on study days 1, 3, and 7 for frequent blood glucose sample testing using a Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI) reference. Results: The overall mean absolute relative difference (MARD ± SD) between abdomen sensor glucose (SG) and YSI reference values was 9.6% ± 9.0% and 9.4% ± 9.8% for the MiniMed 640G insulin pump and Guardian Connect system, respectively; and 8.7% ± 8.0% between arm SG and YSI reference values. The percentage of SG values within 20% agreement of the YSI reference value (for YSI >80 mg/dL) was 90.7% with the MiniMed 640G insulin pump, 91.8% with the Guardian Connect system, and 93.1% for GSR-connected arm sensors. Mean functional sensor life, when calibrating 3–4 times/day, was 145.9 ± 39.3 h for sensors paired with the MiniMed 640G insulin pump, 146.1 ± 41.6 h for sensors paired with the Guardian Connect system, and 147.6 ± 40.4 h for sensors connected to the GSR. Responses to survey questions regarding sensor comfort and ease of use were favorable. Conclusions: The Guardian Sensor 3 glucose sensor, whether located in abdomen or the arm, provided accurate glucose readings when compared with the YSI reference and demonstrated functional life commensurate with the intended 7-day use. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02246582 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5567873 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55678732017-08-30 Accuracy of a Fourth-Generation Subcutaneous Continuous Glucose Sensor Christiansen, Mark P. Garg, Satish K. Brazg, Ronald Bode, Bruce W. Bailey, Timothy S. Slover, Robert H. Sullivan, Ashley Huang, Suiying Shin, John Lee, Scott W. Kaufman, Francine R. Diabetes Technol Ther Original Articles Background: This study evaluated the accuracy and performance of a fourth-generation subcutaneous glucose sensor (Guardian(™) Sensor 3) in the abdomen and arm. Methods: Eighty-eight subjects (14–75 years of age, mean ± standard deviation [SD] of 42.0 ± 19.1 years) with type 1 or type 2 diabetes participated in the study. Subjects wore two sensors in the abdomen that were paired with either a MiniMed(™) 640G insulin pump, or an iPhone(®) or iPod(®) touch(®) running a glucose monitoring mobile application (Guardian Connect system) and a third sensor in the arm, which was connected to a glucose sensor recorder (GSR). Subjects were also asked to undergo in-clinic visits of 12–14 h on study days 1, 3, and 7 for frequent blood glucose sample testing using a Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI) reference. Results: The overall mean absolute relative difference (MARD ± SD) between abdomen sensor glucose (SG) and YSI reference values was 9.6% ± 9.0% and 9.4% ± 9.8% for the MiniMed 640G insulin pump and Guardian Connect system, respectively; and 8.7% ± 8.0% between arm SG and YSI reference values. The percentage of SG values within 20% agreement of the YSI reference value (for YSI >80 mg/dL) was 90.7% with the MiniMed 640G insulin pump, 91.8% with the Guardian Connect system, and 93.1% for GSR-connected arm sensors. Mean functional sensor life, when calibrating 3–4 times/day, was 145.9 ± 39.3 h for sensors paired with the MiniMed 640G insulin pump, 146.1 ± 41.6 h for sensors paired with the Guardian Connect system, and 147.6 ± 40.4 h for sensors connected to the GSR. Responses to survey questions regarding sensor comfort and ease of use were favorable. Conclusions: The Guardian Sensor 3 glucose sensor, whether located in abdomen or the arm, provided accurate glucose readings when compared with the YSI reference and demonstrated functional life commensurate with the intended 7-day use. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02246582 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2017-08-01 2017-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5567873/ /pubmed/28700272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2017.0087 Text en © Mark P. Christiansen et al., 2017; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Christiansen, Mark P. Garg, Satish K. Brazg, Ronald Bode, Bruce W. Bailey, Timothy S. Slover, Robert H. Sullivan, Ashley Huang, Suiying Shin, John Lee, Scott W. Kaufman, Francine R. Accuracy of a Fourth-Generation Subcutaneous Continuous Glucose Sensor |
title | Accuracy of a Fourth-Generation Subcutaneous Continuous Glucose Sensor |
title_full | Accuracy of a Fourth-Generation Subcutaneous Continuous Glucose Sensor |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of a Fourth-Generation Subcutaneous Continuous Glucose Sensor |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of a Fourth-Generation Subcutaneous Continuous Glucose Sensor |
title_short | Accuracy of a Fourth-Generation Subcutaneous Continuous Glucose Sensor |
title_sort | accuracy of a fourth-generation subcutaneous continuous glucose sensor |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5567873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28700272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2017.0087 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT christiansenmarkp accuracyofafourthgenerationsubcutaneouscontinuousglucosesensor AT gargsatishk accuracyofafourthgenerationsubcutaneouscontinuousglucosesensor AT brazgronald accuracyofafourthgenerationsubcutaneouscontinuousglucosesensor AT bodebrucew accuracyofafourthgenerationsubcutaneouscontinuousglucosesensor AT baileytimothys accuracyofafourthgenerationsubcutaneouscontinuousglucosesensor AT sloverroberth accuracyofafourthgenerationsubcutaneouscontinuousglucosesensor AT sullivanashley accuracyofafourthgenerationsubcutaneouscontinuousglucosesensor AT huangsuiying accuracyofafourthgenerationsubcutaneouscontinuousglucosesensor AT shinjohn accuracyofafourthgenerationsubcutaneouscontinuousglucosesensor AT leescottw accuracyofafourthgenerationsubcutaneouscontinuousglucosesensor AT kaufmanfranciner accuracyofafourthgenerationsubcutaneouscontinuousglucosesensor |