Cargando…

Femicide in Turkey between 2000 and 2010

Although intimate partner violence (IPV) is an important problem that threatens women’s health, very few studies focus on the victim—perpetrator relationship or examine this relationship across Turkey. The aim of this study is to contribute to a better understanding of femicide cases in Turkey and t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toprak, Sadik, Ersoy, Gokhan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5568387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28832596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182409
_version_ 1783258854238191616
author Toprak, Sadik
Ersoy, Gokhan
author_facet Toprak, Sadik
Ersoy, Gokhan
author_sort Toprak, Sadik
collection PubMed
description Although intimate partner violence (IPV) is an important problem that threatens women’s health, very few studies focus on the victim—perpetrator relationship or examine this relationship across Turkey. The aim of this study is to contribute to a better understanding of femicide cases in Turkey and to describe the socio-demographic, clinical, forensic, and criminological characteristics of femicide victims and offenders. This study analysed 162 femicide cases that occurred in 12 cities in Turkey from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2010. Eighty women were killed by their partners (classified as intimate partner femicide, IPF), and 81 women were killed by one of their relatives, friends, or strangers (classified as non-intimate partner femicide, non-IPF). According to our results, the typical IPF victim is of child-bearing age, does not have a paid job, is married or divorced, is killed in a domestic setting due to injuries to the thorax or abdomen produced by an edged/pointed weapon or firearm, and is possibly a victim of overkill. The typical IPF perpetrator is close to his victim’s age, has a paid job, has no mental disability, owns a gun, and has threatened his partner or ex-partner previously because of jealousy/infidelity/honour or separation. The typical non-IPF victim is very similar to the IPF victim; however, her marital status can be single, married or divorced, and she is commonly killed by a relative. The surveillance and screening of femicide and IPV is an important step when analysing and attempting to prevent femicide. Second, the training and sensitization of health professionals are important. Moreover, health staff should be encouraged to participate in advocacy interventions. Third, gun ownership must be brought under control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5568387
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55683872017-09-09 Femicide in Turkey between 2000 and 2010 Toprak, Sadik Ersoy, Gokhan PLoS One Research Article Although intimate partner violence (IPV) is an important problem that threatens women’s health, very few studies focus on the victim—perpetrator relationship or examine this relationship across Turkey. The aim of this study is to contribute to a better understanding of femicide cases in Turkey and to describe the socio-demographic, clinical, forensic, and criminological characteristics of femicide victims and offenders. This study analysed 162 femicide cases that occurred in 12 cities in Turkey from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2010. Eighty women were killed by their partners (classified as intimate partner femicide, IPF), and 81 women were killed by one of their relatives, friends, or strangers (classified as non-intimate partner femicide, non-IPF). According to our results, the typical IPF victim is of child-bearing age, does not have a paid job, is married or divorced, is killed in a domestic setting due to injuries to the thorax or abdomen produced by an edged/pointed weapon or firearm, and is possibly a victim of overkill. The typical IPF perpetrator is close to his victim’s age, has a paid job, has no mental disability, owns a gun, and has threatened his partner or ex-partner previously because of jealousy/infidelity/honour or separation. The typical non-IPF victim is very similar to the IPF victim; however, her marital status can be single, married or divorced, and she is commonly killed by a relative. The surveillance and screening of femicide and IPV is an important step when analysing and attempting to prevent femicide. Second, the training and sensitization of health professionals are important. Moreover, health staff should be encouraged to participate in advocacy interventions. Third, gun ownership must be brought under control. Public Library of Science 2017-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5568387/ /pubmed/28832596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182409 Text en © 2017 Toprak, Ersoy http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Toprak, Sadik
Ersoy, Gokhan
Femicide in Turkey between 2000 and 2010
title Femicide in Turkey between 2000 and 2010
title_full Femicide in Turkey between 2000 and 2010
title_fullStr Femicide in Turkey between 2000 and 2010
title_full_unstemmed Femicide in Turkey between 2000 and 2010
title_short Femicide in Turkey between 2000 and 2010
title_sort femicide in turkey between 2000 and 2010
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5568387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28832596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182409
work_keys_str_mv AT topraksadik femicideinturkeybetween2000and2010
AT ersoygokhan femicideinturkeybetween2000and2010