Cargando…
Confirmation bias in human reinforcement learning: Evidence from counterfactual feedback processing
Previous studies suggest that factual learning, that is, learning from obtained outcomes, is biased, such that participants preferentially take into account positive, as compared to negative, prediction errors. However, whether or not the prediction error valence also affects counterfactual learning...
Autores principales: | Palminteri, Stefano, Lefebvre, Germain, Kilford, Emma J., Blakemore, Sarah-Jayne |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5568446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28800597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005684 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The Computational Development of Reinforcement Learning during Adolescence
por: Palminteri, Stefano, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Confirmatory reinforcement learning changes with age during adolescence
por: Chierchia, Gabriele, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Implicit Counterfactual Effect in Partial Feedback Reinforcement Learning: Behavioral and Modeling Approach
por: Barakchian, Zahra, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Associations between age, social reward processing and social anxiety symptoms
por: Kilford, Emma J., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Contrasting temporal difference and opportunity cost reinforcement learning in an empirical money-emergence paradigm
por: Lefebvre, Germain, et al.
Publicado: (2018)