Cargando…
Comparing intensities and modalities within the sensory attenuation paradigm: Preliminary evidence
It is well-documented that the intensity of a self-generated somatosensory stimulus is perceived to be attenuated in respect to an identical stimulus generated by others. At present, it is not clear whether such a phenomenon, known as somatosensory attenuation, is based not only on feedforward motor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5568865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28861281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2017.08.001 |
_version_ | 1783258895887630336 |
---|---|
author | Burin, Dalila Battaglini, Alvise Pia, Lorenzo Falvo, Giusy Palombella, Mattia Salatino, Adriana |
author_facet | Burin, Dalila Battaglini, Alvise Pia, Lorenzo Falvo, Giusy Palombella, Mattia Salatino, Adriana |
author_sort | Burin, Dalila |
collection | PubMed |
description | It is well-documented that the intensity of a self-generated somatosensory stimulus is perceived to be attenuated in respect to an identical stimulus generated by others. At present, it is not clear whether such a phenomenon, known as somatosensory attenuation, is based not only on feedforward motor signals but also on re-afferences towards the body. To answer this question, in the present pilot investigation on twelve healthy subjects, three types of stimulations (sensory non-nociceptive electrical – ES, nociceptive electrical – NES, and vibrotactile – VTS) and intensities (1 = sensory threshold ∗ 2.5 + 2 mA, 2 = sensory threshold ∗ 2.5 + 3 mA, 3 = sensory threshold ∗ 2.5 + 4 mA for ES and NES; 1 = sensory threshold ∗ 2 Hz, 2 = sensory threshold ∗ 3 Hz, 3 = sensory threshold ∗ 4 Hz for VTS) have been directly compared in a somatosensory attenuation paradigm. The results show that the attenuation effect emerged only with electrical stimuli and that it increased with higher intensities. These pilot findings suggest that, depending on the type and the intensity of stimulation, re-afferences can have a role in somatosensory attenuation. Additionally, it is possible to speculate the effect is present only with electrical stimuli because those stimuli are prospectively judged as potentially dangerous. This, in turn, would optimize planning successful reactions to incoming threatening stimuli. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5568865 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55688652017-08-31 Comparing intensities and modalities within the sensory attenuation paradigm: Preliminary evidence Burin, Dalila Battaglini, Alvise Pia, Lorenzo Falvo, Giusy Palombella, Mattia Salatino, Adriana J Adv Res Short communication It is well-documented that the intensity of a self-generated somatosensory stimulus is perceived to be attenuated in respect to an identical stimulus generated by others. At present, it is not clear whether such a phenomenon, known as somatosensory attenuation, is based not only on feedforward motor signals but also on re-afferences towards the body. To answer this question, in the present pilot investigation on twelve healthy subjects, three types of stimulations (sensory non-nociceptive electrical – ES, nociceptive electrical – NES, and vibrotactile – VTS) and intensities (1 = sensory threshold ∗ 2.5 + 2 mA, 2 = sensory threshold ∗ 2.5 + 3 mA, 3 = sensory threshold ∗ 2.5 + 4 mA for ES and NES; 1 = sensory threshold ∗ 2 Hz, 2 = sensory threshold ∗ 3 Hz, 3 = sensory threshold ∗ 4 Hz for VTS) have been directly compared in a somatosensory attenuation paradigm. The results show that the attenuation effect emerged only with electrical stimuli and that it increased with higher intensities. These pilot findings suggest that, depending on the type and the intensity of stimulation, re-afferences can have a role in somatosensory attenuation. Additionally, it is possible to speculate the effect is present only with electrical stimuli because those stimuli are prospectively judged as potentially dangerous. This, in turn, would optimize planning successful reactions to incoming threatening stimuli. Elsevier 2017-11 2017-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5568865/ /pubmed/28861281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2017.08.001 Text en © 2017 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Cairo University. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Short communication Burin, Dalila Battaglini, Alvise Pia, Lorenzo Falvo, Giusy Palombella, Mattia Salatino, Adriana Comparing intensities and modalities within the sensory attenuation paradigm: Preliminary evidence |
title | Comparing intensities and modalities within the sensory attenuation paradigm: Preliminary evidence |
title_full | Comparing intensities and modalities within the sensory attenuation paradigm: Preliminary evidence |
title_fullStr | Comparing intensities and modalities within the sensory attenuation paradigm: Preliminary evidence |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing intensities and modalities within the sensory attenuation paradigm: Preliminary evidence |
title_short | Comparing intensities and modalities within the sensory attenuation paradigm: Preliminary evidence |
title_sort | comparing intensities and modalities within the sensory attenuation paradigm: preliminary evidence |
topic | Short communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5568865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28861281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2017.08.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burindalila comparingintensitiesandmodalitieswithinthesensoryattenuationparadigmpreliminaryevidence AT battaglinialvise comparingintensitiesandmodalitieswithinthesensoryattenuationparadigmpreliminaryevidence AT pialorenzo comparingintensitiesandmodalitieswithinthesensoryattenuationparadigmpreliminaryevidence AT falvogiusy comparingintensitiesandmodalitieswithinthesensoryattenuationparadigmpreliminaryevidence AT palombellamattia comparingintensitiesandmodalitieswithinthesensoryattenuationparadigmpreliminaryevidence AT salatinoadriana comparingintensitiesandmodalitieswithinthesensoryattenuationparadigmpreliminaryevidence |