Cargando…

Comparing intensities and modalities within the sensory attenuation paradigm: Preliminary evidence

It is well-documented that the intensity of a self-generated somatosensory stimulus is perceived to be attenuated in respect to an identical stimulus generated by others. At present, it is not clear whether such a phenomenon, known as somatosensory attenuation, is based not only on feedforward motor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burin, Dalila, Battaglini, Alvise, Pia, Lorenzo, Falvo, Giusy, Palombella, Mattia, Salatino, Adriana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5568865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28861281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2017.08.001
_version_ 1783258895887630336
author Burin, Dalila
Battaglini, Alvise
Pia, Lorenzo
Falvo, Giusy
Palombella, Mattia
Salatino, Adriana
author_facet Burin, Dalila
Battaglini, Alvise
Pia, Lorenzo
Falvo, Giusy
Palombella, Mattia
Salatino, Adriana
author_sort Burin, Dalila
collection PubMed
description It is well-documented that the intensity of a self-generated somatosensory stimulus is perceived to be attenuated in respect to an identical stimulus generated by others. At present, it is not clear whether such a phenomenon, known as somatosensory attenuation, is based not only on feedforward motor signals but also on re-afferences towards the body. To answer this question, in the present pilot investigation on twelve healthy subjects, three types of stimulations (sensory non-nociceptive electrical – ES, nociceptive electrical – NES, and vibrotactile – VTS) and intensities (1 = sensory threshold ∗ 2.5 + 2 mA, 2 = sensory threshold ∗ 2.5 + 3 mA, 3 = sensory threshold ∗ 2.5 + 4 mA for ES and NES; 1 = sensory threshold ∗ 2 Hz, 2 = sensory threshold ∗ 3 Hz, 3 = sensory threshold ∗ 4 Hz for VTS) have been directly compared in a somatosensory attenuation paradigm. The results show that the attenuation effect emerged only with electrical stimuli and that it increased with higher intensities. These pilot findings suggest that, depending on the type and the intensity of stimulation, re-afferences can have a role in somatosensory attenuation. Additionally, it is possible to speculate the effect is present only with electrical stimuli because those stimuli are prospectively judged as potentially dangerous. This, in turn, would optimize planning successful reactions to incoming threatening stimuli.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5568865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55688652017-08-31 Comparing intensities and modalities within the sensory attenuation paradigm: Preliminary evidence Burin, Dalila Battaglini, Alvise Pia, Lorenzo Falvo, Giusy Palombella, Mattia Salatino, Adriana J Adv Res Short communication It is well-documented that the intensity of a self-generated somatosensory stimulus is perceived to be attenuated in respect to an identical stimulus generated by others. At present, it is not clear whether such a phenomenon, known as somatosensory attenuation, is based not only on feedforward motor signals but also on re-afferences towards the body. To answer this question, in the present pilot investigation on twelve healthy subjects, three types of stimulations (sensory non-nociceptive electrical – ES, nociceptive electrical – NES, and vibrotactile – VTS) and intensities (1 = sensory threshold ∗ 2.5 + 2 mA, 2 = sensory threshold ∗ 2.5 + 3 mA, 3 = sensory threshold ∗ 2.5 + 4 mA for ES and NES; 1 = sensory threshold ∗ 2 Hz, 2 = sensory threshold ∗ 3 Hz, 3 = sensory threshold ∗ 4 Hz for VTS) have been directly compared in a somatosensory attenuation paradigm. The results show that the attenuation effect emerged only with electrical stimuli and that it increased with higher intensities. These pilot findings suggest that, depending on the type and the intensity of stimulation, re-afferences can have a role in somatosensory attenuation. Additionally, it is possible to speculate the effect is present only with electrical stimuli because those stimuli are prospectively judged as potentially dangerous. This, in turn, would optimize planning successful reactions to incoming threatening stimuli. Elsevier 2017-11 2017-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5568865/ /pubmed/28861281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2017.08.001 Text en © 2017 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Cairo University. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Short communication
Burin, Dalila
Battaglini, Alvise
Pia, Lorenzo
Falvo, Giusy
Palombella, Mattia
Salatino, Adriana
Comparing intensities and modalities within the sensory attenuation paradigm: Preliminary evidence
title Comparing intensities and modalities within the sensory attenuation paradigm: Preliminary evidence
title_full Comparing intensities and modalities within the sensory attenuation paradigm: Preliminary evidence
title_fullStr Comparing intensities and modalities within the sensory attenuation paradigm: Preliminary evidence
title_full_unstemmed Comparing intensities and modalities within the sensory attenuation paradigm: Preliminary evidence
title_short Comparing intensities and modalities within the sensory attenuation paradigm: Preliminary evidence
title_sort comparing intensities and modalities within the sensory attenuation paradigm: preliminary evidence
topic Short communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5568865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28861281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2017.08.001
work_keys_str_mv AT burindalila comparingintensitiesandmodalitieswithinthesensoryattenuationparadigmpreliminaryevidence
AT battaglinialvise comparingintensitiesandmodalitieswithinthesensoryattenuationparadigmpreliminaryevidence
AT pialorenzo comparingintensitiesandmodalitieswithinthesensoryattenuationparadigmpreliminaryevidence
AT falvogiusy comparingintensitiesandmodalitieswithinthesensoryattenuationparadigmpreliminaryevidence
AT palombellamattia comparingintensitiesandmodalitieswithinthesensoryattenuationparadigmpreliminaryevidence
AT salatinoadriana comparingintensitiesandmodalitieswithinthesensoryattenuationparadigmpreliminaryevidence