Cargando…
Are heart toxicities in breast cancer patients important for radiation oncologists? A practice pattern survey in German speaking countries
BACKGROUND: To assess the personal beliefs of radiation oncologists regarding heart sparing techniques in breast cancer patients. METHODS: Between August 2015 and September 2015, a survey was sent to radiation oncology departments in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. 82 radiation oncology department...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5569472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28835224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3548-2 |
_version_ | 1783258998460383232 |
---|---|
author | Duma, Marciana Nona Münch, Stefan Oechsner, Markus Combs, Stephanie Elisabeth |
author_facet | Duma, Marciana Nona Münch, Stefan Oechsner, Markus Combs, Stephanie Elisabeth |
author_sort | Duma, Marciana Nona |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To assess the personal beliefs of radiation oncologists regarding heart sparing techniques in breast cancer patients. METHODS: Between August 2015 and September 2015, a survey was sent to radiation oncology departments in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. 82 radiation oncology departments answered the questionnaire: 16 university clinics and 66 other departments. Most (87.2%) of the participants had >10 years of radiation oncology experience. RESULTS: 89.2% of the participants felt that there is enough evidence to support heart sparing for breast cancer patients. The most important dose parameter was considered the mean heart dose (69.1%). The personal “safe” dose to the heart was considered to be 5 Gy (range: 0–40 Gy). The main impediment in offering all breast cancer patients heart-sparing techniques seems to be the fact that these techniques are time/ resource consuming (46.5% of the participants). CONCLUSIONS: Most radiation oncologists believe that there is enough evidence to support heart sparing for breast cancer patients. But translating this belief into a wide practice will need better dosimetric and clinical data on what patients are expected to profit most, specific guidelines for which patients’ heart sparing techniques should be performed, as well as recognition of the time/resource consumption of these techniques. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5569472 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55694722017-08-29 Are heart toxicities in breast cancer patients important for radiation oncologists? A practice pattern survey in German speaking countries Duma, Marciana Nona Münch, Stefan Oechsner, Markus Combs, Stephanie Elisabeth BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: To assess the personal beliefs of radiation oncologists regarding heart sparing techniques in breast cancer patients. METHODS: Between August 2015 and September 2015, a survey was sent to radiation oncology departments in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. 82 radiation oncology departments answered the questionnaire: 16 university clinics and 66 other departments. Most (87.2%) of the participants had >10 years of radiation oncology experience. RESULTS: 89.2% of the participants felt that there is enough evidence to support heart sparing for breast cancer patients. The most important dose parameter was considered the mean heart dose (69.1%). The personal “safe” dose to the heart was considered to be 5 Gy (range: 0–40 Gy). The main impediment in offering all breast cancer patients heart-sparing techniques seems to be the fact that these techniques are time/ resource consuming (46.5% of the participants). CONCLUSIONS: Most radiation oncologists believe that there is enough evidence to support heart sparing for breast cancer patients. But translating this belief into a wide practice will need better dosimetric and clinical data on what patients are expected to profit most, specific guidelines for which patients’ heart sparing techniques should be performed, as well as recognition of the time/resource consumption of these techniques. BioMed Central 2017-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5569472/ /pubmed/28835224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3548-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Duma, Marciana Nona Münch, Stefan Oechsner, Markus Combs, Stephanie Elisabeth Are heart toxicities in breast cancer patients important for radiation oncologists? A practice pattern survey in German speaking countries |
title | Are heart toxicities in breast cancer patients important for radiation oncologists? A practice pattern survey in German speaking countries |
title_full | Are heart toxicities in breast cancer patients important for radiation oncologists? A practice pattern survey in German speaking countries |
title_fullStr | Are heart toxicities in breast cancer patients important for radiation oncologists? A practice pattern survey in German speaking countries |
title_full_unstemmed | Are heart toxicities in breast cancer patients important for radiation oncologists? A practice pattern survey in German speaking countries |
title_short | Are heart toxicities in breast cancer patients important for radiation oncologists? A practice pattern survey in German speaking countries |
title_sort | are heart toxicities in breast cancer patients important for radiation oncologists? a practice pattern survey in german speaking countries |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5569472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28835224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3548-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dumamarciananona arehearttoxicitiesinbreastcancerpatientsimportantforradiationoncologistsapracticepatternsurveyingermanspeakingcountries AT munchstefan arehearttoxicitiesinbreastcancerpatientsimportantforradiationoncologistsapracticepatternsurveyingermanspeakingcountries AT oechsnermarkus arehearttoxicitiesinbreastcancerpatientsimportantforradiationoncologistsapracticepatternsurveyingermanspeakingcountries AT combsstephanieelisabeth arehearttoxicitiesinbreastcancerpatientsimportantforradiationoncologistsapracticepatternsurveyingermanspeakingcountries |