Cargando…

Are heart toxicities in breast cancer patients important for radiation oncologists? A practice pattern survey in German speaking countries

BACKGROUND: To assess the personal beliefs of radiation oncologists regarding heart sparing techniques in breast cancer patients. METHODS: Between August 2015 and September 2015, a survey was sent to radiation oncology departments in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. 82 radiation oncology department...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duma, Marciana Nona, Münch, Stefan, Oechsner, Markus, Combs, Stephanie Elisabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5569472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28835224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3548-2
_version_ 1783258998460383232
author Duma, Marciana Nona
Münch, Stefan
Oechsner, Markus
Combs, Stephanie Elisabeth
author_facet Duma, Marciana Nona
Münch, Stefan
Oechsner, Markus
Combs, Stephanie Elisabeth
author_sort Duma, Marciana Nona
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To assess the personal beliefs of radiation oncologists regarding heart sparing techniques in breast cancer patients. METHODS: Between August 2015 and September 2015, a survey was sent to radiation oncology departments in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. 82 radiation oncology departments answered the questionnaire: 16 university clinics and 66 other departments. Most (87.2%) of the participants had >10 years of radiation oncology experience. RESULTS: 89.2% of the participants felt that there is enough evidence to support heart sparing for breast cancer patients. The most important dose parameter was considered the mean heart dose (69.1%). The personal “safe” dose to the heart was considered to be 5 Gy (range: 0–40 Gy). The main impediment in offering all breast cancer patients heart-sparing techniques seems to be the fact that these techniques are time/ resource consuming (46.5% of the participants). CONCLUSIONS: Most radiation oncologists believe that there is enough evidence to support heart sparing for breast cancer patients. But translating this belief into a wide practice will need better dosimetric and clinical data on what patients are expected to profit most, specific guidelines for which patients’ heart sparing techniques should be performed, as well as recognition of the time/resource consumption of these techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5569472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55694722017-08-29 Are heart toxicities in breast cancer patients important for radiation oncologists? A practice pattern survey in German speaking countries Duma, Marciana Nona Münch, Stefan Oechsner, Markus Combs, Stephanie Elisabeth BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: To assess the personal beliefs of radiation oncologists regarding heart sparing techniques in breast cancer patients. METHODS: Between August 2015 and September 2015, a survey was sent to radiation oncology departments in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. 82 radiation oncology departments answered the questionnaire: 16 university clinics and 66 other departments. Most (87.2%) of the participants had >10 years of radiation oncology experience. RESULTS: 89.2% of the participants felt that there is enough evidence to support heart sparing for breast cancer patients. The most important dose parameter was considered the mean heart dose (69.1%). The personal “safe” dose to the heart was considered to be 5 Gy (range: 0–40 Gy). The main impediment in offering all breast cancer patients heart-sparing techniques seems to be the fact that these techniques are time/ resource consuming (46.5% of the participants). CONCLUSIONS: Most radiation oncologists believe that there is enough evidence to support heart sparing for breast cancer patients. But translating this belief into a wide practice will need better dosimetric and clinical data on what patients are expected to profit most, specific guidelines for which patients’ heart sparing techniques should be performed, as well as recognition of the time/resource consumption of these techniques. BioMed Central 2017-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5569472/ /pubmed/28835224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3548-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Duma, Marciana Nona
Münch, Stefan
Oechsner, Markus
Combs, Stephanie Elisabeth
Are heart toxicities in breast cancer patients important for radiation oncologists? A practice pattern survey in German speaking countries
title Are heart toxicities in breast cancer patients important for radiation oncologists? A practice pattern survey in German speaking countries
title_full Are heart toxicities in breast cancer patients important for radiation oncologists? A practice pattern survey in German speaking countries
title_fullStr Are heart toxicities in breast cancer patients important for radiation oncologists? A practice pattern survey in German speaking countries
title_full_unstemmed Are heart toxicities in breast cancer patients important for radiation oncologists? A practice pattern survey in German speaking countries
title_short Are heart toxicities in breast cancer patients important for radiation oncologists? A practice pattern survey in German speaking countries
title_sort are heart toxicities in breast cancer patients important for radiation oncologists? a practice pattern survey in german speaking countries
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5569472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28835224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3548-2
work_keys_str_mv AT dumamarciananona arehearttoxicitiesinbreastcancerpatientsimportantforradiationoncologistsapracticepatternsurveyingermanspeakingcountries
AT munchstefan arehearttoxicitiesinbreastcancerpatientsimportantforradiationoncologistsapracticepatternsurveyingermanspeakingcountries
AT oechsnermarkus arehearttoxicitiesinbreastcancerpatientsimportantforradiationoncologistsapracticepatternsurveyingermanspeakingcountries
AT combsstephanieelisabeth arehearttoxicitiesinbreastcancerpatientsimportantforradiationoncologistsapracticepatternsurveyingermanspeakingcountries