Cargando…
Model checking in multiple imputation: an overview and case study
BACKGROUND: Multiple imputation has become very popular as a general-purpose method for handling missing data. The validity of multiple-imputation-based analyses relies on the use of an appropriate model to impute the missing values. Despite the widespread use of multiple imputation, there are few g...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5569512/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28852415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12982-017-0062-6 |
_version_ | 1783259007965724672 |
---|---|
author | Nguyen, Cattram D. Carlin, John B. Lee, Katherine J. |
author_facet | Nguyen, Cattram D. Carlin, John B. Lee, Katherine J. |
author_sort | Nguyen, Cattram D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Multiple imputation has become very popular as a general-purpose method for handling missing data. The validity of multiple-imputation-based analyses relies on the use of an appropriate model to impute the missing values. Despite the widespread use of multiple imputation, there are few guidelines available for checking imputation models. ANALYSIS: In this paper, we provide an overview of currently available methods for checking imputation models. These include graphical checks and numerical summaries, as well as simulation-based methods such as posterior predictive checking. These model checking techniques are illustrated using an analysis affected by missing data from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children. CONCLUSIONS: As multiple imputation becomes further established as a standard approach for handling missing data, it will become increasingly important that researchers employ appropriate model checking approaches to ensure that reliable results are obtained when using this method. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12982-017-0062-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5569512 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55695122017-08-29 Model checking in multiple imputation: an overview and case study Nguyen, Cattram D. Carlin, John B. Lee, Katherine J. Emerg Themes Epidemiol Analytic Perspective BACKGROUND: Multiple imputation has become very popular as a general-purpose method for handling missing data. The validity of multiple-imputation-based analyses relies on the use of an appropriate model to impute the missing values. Despite the widespread use of multiple imputation, there are few guidelines available for checking imputation models. ANALYSIS: In this paper, we provide an overview of currently available methods for checking imputation models. These include graphical checks and numerical summaries, as well as simulation-based methods such as posterior predictive checking. These model checking techniques are illustrated using an analysis affected by missing data from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children. CONCLUSIONS: As multiple imputation becomes further established as a standard approach for handling missing data, it will become increasingly important that researchers employ appropriate model checking approaches to ensure that reliable results are obtained when using this method. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12982-017-0062-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5569512/ /pubmed/28852415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12982-017-0062-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Analytic Perspective Nguyen, Cattram D. Carlin, John B. Lee, Katherine J. Model checking in multiple imputation: an overview and case study |
title | Model checking in multiple imputation: an overview and case study |
title_full | Model checking in multiple imputation: an overview and case study |
title_fullStr | Model checking in multiple imputation: an overview and case study |
title_full_unstemmed | Model checking in multiple imputation: an overview and case study |
title_short | Model checking in multiple imputation: an overview and case study |
title_sort | model checking in multiple imputation: an overview and case study |
topic | Analytic Perspective |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5569512/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28852415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12982-017-0062-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nguyencattramd modelcheckinginmultipleimputationanoverviewandcasestudy AT carlinjohnb modelcheckinginmultipleimputationanoverviewandcasestudy AT leekatherinej modelcheckinginmultipleimputationanoverviewandcasestudy |