Cargando…

Using routinely recorded data in the UK to assess outcomes in a randomised controlled trial: The Trials of Access

BACKGROUND: In the UK, routinely recorded data may benefit prospective studies including randomised controlled trials (RCTs). In an on-going study, we aim to assess the feasibility of access and agreement of routinely recorded clinical and non-clinical data compared to data collected during a RCT us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Powell, G. A., Bonnett, L. J., Tudur-Smith, C., Hughes, D. A., Williamson, P. R., Marson, A. G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5569524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28835254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2135-9
_version_ 1783259010816802816
author Powell, G. A.
Bonnett, L. J.
Tudur-Smith, C.
Hughes, D. A.
Williamson, P. R.
Marson, A. G.
author_facet Powell, G. A.
Bonnett, L. J.
Tudur-Smith, C.
Hughes, D. A.
Williamson, P. R.
Marson, A. G.
author_sort Powell, G. A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the UK, routinely recorded data may benefit prospective studies including randomised controlled trials (RCTs). In an on-going study, we aim to assess the feasibility of access and agreement of routinely recorded clinical and non-clinical data compared to data collected during a RCT using standard prospective methods. This paper will summarise available UK routinely recorded data sources and discuss our experience with the feasibility of accessing routinely recorded data for participants of a RCT before finally proposing recommendations for improving the access and implementation of routinely recorded data in RCTs. METHODS: Setting: the case study RCT is the Standard and New Antiepileptic Drugs II (SANAD II) trial, a pragmatic, UK, multicentre, phase IV RCT assessing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of antiepileptic drug treatments for newly diagnosed epilepsy. Participants: 98 participants have provided written consent to permit the request of routinely recorded data. Study procedures: routinely recorded clinical and non-clinical data were identified and data requested through formal applications from available data holders for the duration that participants have been recruited into SANAD II. The feasibility of accessing routinely recorded data during a RCT is assessed and recommendations for improving access proposed. RESULTS: Secondary-care clinical and socioeconomic data is recorded on a national basis and can be accessed, although there are limitations in the application process. Primary-care data are recorded by a number of organisations on a de-identified basis but access for specific individuals has not been feasible. Access to data recorded by non-clinical sources, including The Department for Work and Pensions and The Driving and Vehicle Licensing Agency, was not successful. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations discussed include further research to assess the attributes of routinely recorded data, an assessment of public perceptions and the development of strategies to collaboratively improve access to routinely recorded data for research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials, ISRCTN30294119. Registered on 3 July 2012. EudraCT No: 2012-001884-64. Registered on 9 May 2012.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5569524
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55695242017-08-29 Using routinely recorded data in the UK to assess outcomes in a randomised controlled trial: The Trials of Access Powell, G. A. Bonnett, L. J. Tudur-Smith, C. Hughes, D. A. Williamson, P. R. Marson, A. G. Trials Research BACKGROUND: In the UK, routinely recorded data may benefit prospective studies including randomised controlled trials (RCTs). In an on-going study, we aim to assess the feasibility of access and agreement of routinely recorded clinical and non-clinical data compared to data collected during a RCT using standard prospective methods. This paper will summarise available UK routinely recorded data sources and discuss our experience with the feasibility of accessing routinely recorded data for participants of a RCT before finally proposing recommendations for improving the access and implementation of routinely recorded data in RCTs. METHODS: Setting: the case study RCT is the Standard and New Antiepileptic Drugs II (SANAD II) trial, a pragmatic, UK, multicentre, phase IV RCT assessing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of antiepileptic drug treatments for newly diagnosed epilepsy. Participants: 98 participants have provided written consent to permit the request of routinely recorded data. Study procedures: routinely recorded clinical and non-clinical data were identified and data requested through formal applications from available data holders for the duration that participants have been recruited into SANAD II. The feasibility of accessing routinely recorded data during a RCT is assessed and recommendations for improving access proposed. RESULTS: Secondary-care clinical and socioeconomic data is recorded on a national basis and can be accessed, although there are limitations in the application process. Primary-care data are recorded by a number of organisations on a de-identified basis but access for specific individuals has not been feasible. Access to data recorded by non-clinical sources, including The Department for Work and Pensions and The Driving and Vehicle Licensing Agency, was not successful. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations discussed include further research to assess the attributes of routinely recorded data, an assessment of public perceptions and the development of strategies to collaboratively improve access to routinely recorded data for research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials, ISRCTN30294119. Registered on 3 July 2012. EudraCT No: 2012-001884-64. Registered on 9 May 2012. BioMed Central 2017-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5569524/ /pubmed/28835254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2135-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Powell, G. A.
Bonnett, L. J.
Tudur-Smith, C.
Hughes, D. A.
Williamson, P. R.
Marson, A. G.
Using routinely recorded data in the UK to assess outcomes in a randomised controlled trial: The Trials of Access
title Using routinely recorded data in the UK to assess outcomes in a randomised controlled trial: The Trials of Access
title_full Using routinely recorded data in the UK to assess outcomes in a randomised controlled trial: The Trials of Access
title_fullStr Using routinely recorded data in the UK to assess outcomes in a randomised controlled trial: The Trials of Access
title_full_unstemmed Using routinely recorded data in the UK to assess outcomes in a randomised controlled trial: The Trials of Access
title_short Using routinely recorded data in the UK to assess outcomes in a randomised controlled trial: The Trials of Access
title_sort using routinely recorded data in the uk to assess outcomes in a randomised controlled trial: the trials of access
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5569524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28835254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2135-9
work_keys_str_mv AT powellga usingroutinelyrecordeddataintheuktoassessoutcomesinarandomisedcontrolledtrialthetrialsofaccess
AT bonnettlj usingroutinelyrecordeddataintheuktoassessoutcomesinarandomisedcontrolledtrialthetrialsofaccess
AT tudursmithc usingroutinelyrecordeddataintheuktoassessoutcomesinarandomisedcontrolledtrialthetrialsofaccess
AT hughesda usingroutinelyrecordeddataintheuktoassessoutcomesinarandomisedcontrolledtrialthetrialsofaccess
AT williamsonpr usingroutinelyrecordeddataintheuktoassessoutcomesinarandomisedcontrolledtrialthetrialsofaccess
AT marsonag usingroutinelyrecordeddataintheuktoassessoutcomesinarandomisedcontrolledtrialthetrialsofaccess