Cargando…
Using routinely recorded data in the UK to assess outcomes in a randomised controlled trial: The Trials of Access
BACKGROUND: In the UK, routinely recorded data may benefit prospective studies including randomised controlled trials (RCTs). In an on-going study, we aim to assess the feasibility of access and agreement of routinely recorded clinical and non-clinical data compared to data collected during a RCT us...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5569524/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28835254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2135-9 |
_version_ | 1783259010816802816 |
---|---|
author | Powell, G. A. Bonnett, L. J. Tudur-Smith, C. Hughes, D. A. Williamson, P. R. Marson, A. G. |
author_facet | Powell, G. A. Bonnett, L. J. Tudur-Smith, C. Hughes, D. A. Williamson, P. R. Marson, A. G. |
author_sort | Powell, G. A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In the UK, routinely recorded data may benefit prospective studies including randomised controlled trials (RCTs). In an on-going study, we aim to assess the feasibility of access and agreement of routinely recorded clinical and non-clinical data compared to data collected during a RCT using standard prospective methods. This paper will summarise available UK routinely recorded data sources and discuss our experience with the feasibility of accessing routinely recorded data for participants of a RCT before finally proposing recommendations for improving the access and implementation of routinely recorded data in RCTs. METHODS: Setting: the case study RCT is the Standard and New Antiepileptic Drugs II (SANAD II) trial, a pragmatic, UK, multicentre, phase IV RCT assessing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of antiepileptic drug treatments for newly diagnosed epilepsy. Participants: 98 participants have provided written consent to permit the request of routinely recorded data. Study procedures: routinely recorded clinical and non-clinical data were identified and data requested through formal applications from available data holders for the duration that participants have been recruited into SANAD II. The feasibility of accessing routinely recorded data during a RCT is assessed and recommendations for improving access proposed. RESULTS: Secondary-care clinical and socioeconomic data is recorded on a national basis and can be accessed, although there are limitations in the application process. Primary-care data are recorded by a number of organisations on a de-identified basis but access for specific individuals has not been feasible. Access to data recorded by non-clinical sources, including The Department for Work and Pensions and The Driving and Vehicle Licensing Agency, was not successful. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations discussed include further research to assess the attributes of routinely recorded data, an assessment of public perceptions and the development of strategies to collaboratively improve access to routinely recorded data for research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials, ISRCTN30294119. Registered on 3 July 2012. EudraCT No: 2012-001884-64. Registered on 9 May 2012. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5569524 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55695242017-08-29 Using routinely recorded data in the UK to assess outcomes in a randomised controlled trial: The Trials of Access Powell, G. A. Bonnett, L. J. Tudur-Smith, C. Hughes, D. A. Williamson, P. R. Marson, A. G. Trials Research BACKGROUND: In the UK, routinely recorded data may benefit prospective studies including randomised controlled trials (RCTs). In an on-going study, we aim to assess the feasibility of access and agreement of routinely recorded clinical and non-clinical data compared to data collected during a RCT using standard prospective methods. This paper will summarise available UK routinely recorded data sources and discuss our experience with the feasibility of accessing routinely recorded data for participants of a RCT before finally proposing recommendations for improving the access and implementation of routinely recorded data in RCTs. METHODS: Setting: the case study RCT is the Standard and New Antiepileptic Drugs II (SANAD II) trial, a pragmatic, UK, multicentre, phase IV RCT assessing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of antiepileptic drug treatments for newly diagnosed epilepsy. Participants: 98 participants have provided written consent to permit the request of routinely recorded data. Study procedures: routinely recorded clinical and non-clinical data were identified and data requested through formal applications from available data holders for the duration that participants have been recruited into SANAD II. The feasibility of accessing routinely recorded data during a RCT is assessed and recommendations for improving access proposed. RESULTS: Secondary-care clinical and socioeconomic data is recorded on a national basis and can be accessed, although there are limitations in the application process. Primary-care data are recorded by a number of organisations on a de-identified basis but access for specific individuals has not been feasible. Access to data recorded by non-clinical sources, including The Department for Work and Pensions and The Driving and Vehicle Licensing Agency, was not successful. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations discussed include further research to assess the attributes of routinely recorded data, an assessment of public perceptions and the development of strategies to collaboratively improve access to routinely recorded data for research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials, ISRCTN30294119. Registered on 3 July 2012. EudraCT No: 2012-001884-64. Registered on 9 May 2012. BioMed Central 2017-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5569524/ /pubmed/28835254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2135-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Powell, G. A. Bonnett, L. J. Tudur-Smith, C. Hughes, D. A. Williamson, P. R. Marson, A. G. Using routinely recorded data in the UK to assess outcomes in a randomised controlled trial: The Trials of Access |
title | Using routinely recorded data in the UK to assess outcomes in a randomised controlled trial: The Trials of Access |
title_full | Using routinely recorded data in the UK to assess outcomes in a randomised controlled trial: The Trials of Access |
title_fullStr | Using routinely recorded data in the UK to assess outcomes in a randomised controlled trial: The Trials of Access |
title_full_unstemmed | Using routinely recorded data in the UK to assess outcomes in a randomised controlled trial: The Trials of Access |
title_short | Using routinely recorded data in the UK to assess outcomes in a randomised controlled trial: The Trials of Access |
title_sort | using routinely recorded data in the uk to assess outcomes in a randomised controlled trial: the trials of access |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5569524/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28835254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2135-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT powellga usingroutinelyrecordeddataintheuktoassessoutcomesinarandomisedcontrolledtrialthetrialsofaccess AT bonnettlj usingroutinelyrecordeddataintheuktoassessoutcomesinarandomisedcontrolledtrialthetrialsofaccess AT tudursmithc usingroutinelyrecordeddataintheuktoassessoutcomesinarandomisedcontrolledtrialthetrialsofaccess AT hughesda usingroutinelyrecordeddataintheuktoassessoutcomesinarandomisedcontrolledtrialthetrialsofaccess AT williamsonpr usingroutinelyrecordeddataintheuktoassessoutcomesinarandomisedcontrolledtrialthetrialsofaccess AT marsonag usingroutinelyrecordeddataintheuktoassessoutcomesinarandomisedcontrolledtrialthetrialsofaccess |