Cargando…

Robotic pulmonary lobectomy for lung cancer treatment: program implementation and initial experience

OBJECTIVE: To describe the implementation of a robotic thoracic surgery program at a public tertiary teaching hospital and to analyze its initial results. METHODS: This was a planned interim analysis of a randomized clinical trial aimed at comparing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and robotic s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Terra, Ricardo Mingarini, de Araujo, Pedro Henrique Xavier Nabuco, Lauricella, Leticia Leone, de Campos, José Ribas Milanez, Costa, Herbert Felix, Pego-Fernandes, Paulo Manuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5569613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27383931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-37562015000000212
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To describe the implementation of a robotic thoracic surgery program at a public tertiary teaching hospital and to analyze its initial results. METHODS: This was a planned interim analysis of a randomized clinical trial aimed at comparing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and robotic surgery in terms of the results obtained after pulmonary lobectomy. The robotic surgery program developed at the Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, in the city of São Paulo, Brazil, is a multidisciplinary initiative involving various surgical specialties, as well as anesthesiology, nursing, and clinical engineering teams. In this analysis, we evaluated the patients included in the robotic lobectomy arm of the trial during its first three months (from April to June of 2015). RESULTS: Ten patients were included in this analysis. There were eight women and two men. The mean age was 65.1 years. All of the patients presented with peripheral tumors. We performed right upper lobectomy in four patients, right lower lobectomy in four, and left upper lobectomy in two. Surgical time varied considerably (range, 135-435 min). Conversion to open surgery or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery was not necessary in any of the cases. Intraoperative complications were not found. Only the first patient required postoperative transfer to the ICU. There were no deaths or readmissions within the first 30 days after discharge. The only postoperative complication was chest pain (grade 3), in two patients. Pathological examination revealed complete tumor resection in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: When there is integration and proper training of all of the teams involved, the implementation of a robotic thoracic surgery program is feasible and can reduce morbidity and mortality.