Cargando…
P-LUM-11: Comparison of diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology or cellblock in solid lesions
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a procedure of choice for diagnostic evaluation of endoluminal and periluminal lesions. Tissue sample can be obtained by EUS-FNA cytology or cellblock (CB). The aim of the present study is to compare diagnost...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5569763/ http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2303-9027.212329 |
_version_ | 1783259048908423168 |
---|---|
author | Balekuduru, Avinash Dutta, Amit Kumar |
author_facet | Balekuduru, Avinash Dutta, Amit Kumar |
author_sort | Balekuduru, Avinash |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a procedure of choice for diagnostic evaluation of endoluminal and periluminal lesions. Tissue sample can be obtained by EUS-FNA cytology or cellblock (CB). The aim of the present study is to compare diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA CB and/or cytology in the absence of on-site pathologist following a protocol-based EUS-FNA approach in solid lesions. METHODS: Subjects who underwent EUS FNA at our center were included in this 2-year retrospective study. The etiological, clinical, and investigation details were recorded on uniform structured data forms. Superiority of the yield was calculated by McNemar’s test for P value. RESULTS: Pancreatic masses were the most common indications (34%), followed by nodes (29%) in 114 EUS-FNA solid lesions. The diagnostic yield for EUS-FNA cytology was 68%, CB was 77%, and combined was 81%. There was no statistical significance in the yield between cytology and CB. CB was superior in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, lymphoma, stromal tumors, and liver mass evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-FNA needles provide good specimen for CB, and combination of CB with cytology increases the yield. CB is preferred over cytology in selected patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5569763 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55697632017-09-01 P-LUM-11: Comparison of diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology or cellblock in solid lesions Balekuduru, Avinash Dutta, Amit Kumar Endosc Ultrasound Abstract BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a procedure of choice for diagnostic evaluation of endoluminal and periluminal lesions. Tissue sample can be obtained by EUS-FNA cytology or cellblock (CB). The aim of the present study is to compare diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA CB and/or cytology in the absence of on-site pathologist following a protocol-based EUS-FNA approach in solid lesions. METHODS: Subjects who underwent EUS FNA at our center were included in this 2-year retrospective study. The etiological, clinical, and investigation details were recorded on uniform structured data forms. Superiority of the yield was calculated by McNemar’s test for P value. RESULTS: Pancreatic masses were the most common indications (34%), followed by nodes (29%) in 114 EUS-FNA solid lesions. The diagnostic yield for EUS-FNA cytology was 68%, CB was 77%, and combined was 81%. There was no statistical significance in the yield between cytology and CB. CB was superior in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, lymphoma, stromal tumors, and liver mass evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-FNA needles provide good specimen for CB, and combination of CB with cytology increases the yield. CB is preferred over cytology in selected patients. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5569763/ http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2303-9027.212329 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Endoscopic Ultrasound http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Abstract Balekuduru, Avinash Dutta, Amit Kumar P-LUM-11: Comparison of diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology or cellblock in solid lesions |
title | P-LUM-11: Comparison of diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology or cellblock in solid lesions |
title_full | P-LUM-11: Comparison of diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology or cellblock in solid lesions |
title_fullStr | P-LUM-11: Comparison of diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology or cellblock in solid lesions |
title_full_unstemmed | P-LUM-11: Comparison of diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology or cellblock in solid lesions |
title_short | P-LUM-11: Comparison of diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology or cellblock in solid lesions |
title_sort | p-lum-11: comparison of diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology or cellblock in solid lesions |
topic | Abstract |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5569763/ http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2303-9027.212329 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT balekuduruavinash plum11comparisonofdiagnosticyieldofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyorcellblockinsolidlesions AT duttaamitkumar plum11comparisonofdiagnosticyieldofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyorcellblockinsolidlesions |