Cargando…

P-LUM-11: Comparison of diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology or cellblock in solid lesions

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a procedure of choice for diagnostic evaluation of endoluminal and periluminal lesions. Tissue sample can be obtained by EUS-FNA cytology or cellblock (CB). The aim of the present study is to compare diagnost...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Balekuduru, Avinash, Dutta, Amit Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5569763/
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2303-9027.212329
_version_ 1783259048908423168
author Balekuduru, Avinash
Dutta, Amit Kumar
author_facet Balekuduru, Avinash
Dutta, Amit Kumar
author_sort Balekuduru, Avinash
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a procedure of choice for diagnostic evaluation of endoluminal and periluminal lesions. Tissue sample can be obtained by EUS-FNA cytology or cellblock (CB). The aim of the present study is to compare diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA CB and/or cytology in the absence of on-site pathologist following a protocol-based EUS-FNA approach in solid lesions. METHODS: Subjects who underwent EUS FNA at our center were included in this 2-year retrospective study. The etiological, clinical, and investigation details were recorded on uniform structured data forms. Superiority of the yield was calculated by McNemar’s test for P value. RESULTS: Pancreatic masses were the most common indications (34%), followed by nodes (29%) in 114 EUS-FNA solid lesions. The diagnostic yield for EUS-FNA cytology was 68%, CB was 77%, and combined was 81%. There was no statistical significance in the yield between cytology and CB. CB was superior in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, lymphoma, stromal tumors, and liver mass evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-FNA needles provide good specimen for CB, and combination of CB with cytology increases the yield. CB is preferred over cytology in selected patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5569763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55697632017-09-01 P-LUM-11: Comparison of diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology or cellblock in solid lesions Balekuduru, Avinash Dutta, Amit Kumar Endosc Ultrasound Abstract BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a procedure of choice for diagnostic evaluation of endoluminal and periluminal lesions. Tissue sample can be obtained by EUS-FNA cytology or cellblock (CB). The aim of the present study is to compare diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA CB and/or cytology in the absence of on-site pathologist following a protocol-based EUS-FNA approach in solid lesions. METHODS: Subjects who underwent EUS FNA at our center were included in this 2-year retrospective study. The etiological, clinical, and investigation details were recorded on uniform structured data forms. Superiority of the yield was calculated by McNemar’s test for P value. RESULTS: Pancreatic masses were the most common indications (34%), followed by nodes (29%) in 114 EUS-FNA solid lesions. The diagnostic yield for EUS-FNA cytology was 68%, CB was 77%, and combined was 81%. There was no statistical significance in the yield between cytology and CB. CB was superior in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, lymphoma, stromal tumors, and liver mass evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-FNA needles provide good specimen for CB, and combination of CB with cytology increases the yield. CB is preferred over cytology in selected patients. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5569763/ http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2303-9027.212329 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Endoscopic Ultrasound http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Abstract
Balekuduru, Avinash
Dutta, Amit Kumar
P-LUM-11: Comparison of diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology or cellblock in solid lesions
title P-LUM-11: Comparison of diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology or cellblock in solid lesions
title_full P-LUM-11: Comparison of diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology or cellblock in solid lesions
title_fullStr P-LUM-11: Comparison of diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology or cellblock in solid lesions
title_full_unstemmed P-LUM-11: Comparison of diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology or cellblock in solid lesions
title_short P-LUM-11: Comparison of diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology or cellblock in solid lesions
title_sort p-lum-11: comparison of diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology or cellblock in solid lesions
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5569763/
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2303-9027.212329
work_keys_str_mv AT balekuduruavinash plum11comparisonofdiagnosticyieldofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyorcellblockinsolidlesions
AT duttaamitkumar plum11comparisonofdiagnosticyieldofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationcytologyorcellblockinsolidlesions