Cargando…

P-THER-05: Endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy: Why to scuff when you can flush the muck-make it an easy row to hoe

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage of symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON) followed by fully covered self-expanding metal stent (FCSEMS) placement offers several advantages such as higher technical success and option of necrosectomy. The aim was to eva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bansal, Rinkesh, Puri, Rajesh, Choudhary, Narendra S., Sud, Randhir, Patle, Saurabh, Guleria, Mridula, Sarin, Haimanti, Kaur, Gagandeep, Prabha, Chandra, Bhatia, Sumit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5569803/
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2303-9027.212303
_version_ 1783259058805932032
author Bansal, Rinkesh
Puri, Rajesh
Choudhary, Narendra S.
Sud, Randhir
Patle, Saurabh
Guleria, Mridula
Sarin, Haimanti
Kaur, Gagandeep
Prabha, Chandra
Bhatia, Sumit
author_facet Bansal, Rinkesh
Puri, Rajesh
Choudhary, Narendra S.
Sud, Randhir
Patle, Saurabh
Guleria, Mridula
Sarin, Haimanti
Kaur, Gagandeep
Prabha, Chandra
Bhatia, Sumit
author_sort Bansal, Rinkesh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage of symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON) followed by fully covered self-expanding metal stent (FCSEMS) placement offers several advantages such as higher technical success and option of necrosectomy. The aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EUS-guided drainage of patients with WON using FCSEMS and intracavitary lavage with solution containing hydrogen peroxide by adopting a step-up approach. METHODS: A prospective open-label study was done at a single tertiary care center from January 2014 to January 2016. Patients with symptomatic WON who underwent EUS-guided drainage followed by FCSEMS placement were included in the study. Primary endpoints were complete drainage with improvement in symptoms or major adverse events. Secondary endpoints were minor adverse events related to procedures. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients (mean age 36 years; 52 males) were included. Technical success was achieved in 100% and clinical success was achieved in 90.6%. Complete drainage was achieved with FCSEMS alone in 18 (28.1%), FCSEMS with necrosectomy using lavage in 40 (62.5%), FCSEMS with percutaneous drainage in 5 (7.8%), and 1 (1.5%) patient required salvage surgery. Major adverse events were life-threatening bleeding in 3 (4.6%). Minor adverse events were nonlife-threatening bleeding in 2 (3.1%) patients and stent migration in 3 (4.6%) patients. CONCLUSION: EUS-guided WON drainage with FCSEMS followed by necrosectomy with lavage using solution containing hydrogen peroxide as a step-up approach is a minimally invasive and effective method with high technical and clinical success. Patients with solid debris >40% need aggressive management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5569803
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55698032017-09-01 P-THER-05: Endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy: Why to scuff when you can flush the muck-make it an easy row to hoe Bansal, Rinkesh Puri, Rajesh Choudhary, Narendra S. Sud, Randhir Patle, Saurabh Guleria, Mridula Sarin, Haimanti Kaur, Gagandeep Prabha, Chandra Bhatia, Sumit Endosc Ultrasound Abstract BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage of symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON) followed by fully covered self-expanding metal stent (FCSEMS) placement offers several advantages such as higher technical success and option of necrosectomy. The aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EUS-guided drainage of patients with WON using FCSEMS and intracavitary lavage with solution containing hydrogen peroxide by adopting a step-up approach. METHODS: A prospective open-label study was done at a single tertiary care center from January 2014 to January 2016. Patients with symptomatic WON who underwent EUS-guided drainage followed by FCSEMS placement were included in the study. Primary endpoints were complete drainage with improvement in symptoms or major adverse events. Secondary endpoints were minor adverse events related to procedures. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients (mean age 36 years; 52 males) were included. Technical success was achieved in 100% and clinical success was achieved in 90.6%. Complete drainage was achieved with FCSEMS alone in 18 (28.1%), FCSEMS with necrosectomy using lavage in 40 (62.5%), FCSEMS with percutaneous drainage in 5 (7.8%), and 1 (1.5%) patient required salvage surgery. Major adverse events were life-threatening bleeding in 3 (4.6%). Minor adverse events were nonlife-threatening bleeding in 2 (3.1%) patients and stent migration in 3 (4.6%) patients. CONCLUSION: EUS-guided WON drainage with FCSEMS followed by necrosectomy with lavage using solution containing hydrogen peroxide as a step-up approach is a minimally invasive and effective method with high technical and clinical success. Patients with solid debris >40% need aggressive management. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5569803/ http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2303-9027.212303 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Endoscopic Ultrasound http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Abstract
Bansal, Rinkesh
Puri, Rajesh
Choudhary, Narendra S.
Sud, Randhir
Patle, Saurabh
Guleria, Mridula
Sarin, Haimanti
Kaur, Gagandeep
Prabha, Chandra
Bhatia, Sumit
P-THER-05: Endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy: Why to scuff when you can flush the muck-make it an easy row to hoe
title P-THER-05: Endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy: Why to scuff when you can flush the muck-make it an easy row to hoe
title_full P-THER-05: Endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy: Why to scuff when you can flush the muck-make it an easy row to hoe
title_fullStr P-THER-05: Endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy: Why to scuff when you can flush the muck-make it an easy row to hoe
title_full_unstemmed P-THER-05: Endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy: Why to scuff when you can flush the muck-make it an easy row to hoe
title_short P-THER-05: Endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy: Why to scuff when you can flush the muck-make it an easy row to hoe
title_sort p-ther-05: endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy: why to scuff when you can flush the muck-make it an easy row to hoe
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5569803/
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2303-9027.212303
work_keys_str_mv AT bansalrinkesh pther05endoscopicpancreaticnecrosectomywhytoscuffwhenyoucanflushthemuckmakeitaneasyrowtohoe
AT purirajesh pther05endoscopicpancreaticnecrosectomywhytoscuffwhenyoucanflushthemuckmakeitaneasyrowtohoe
AT choudharynarendras pther05endoscopicpancreaticnecrosectomywhytoscuffwhenyoucanflushthemuckmakeitaneasyrowtohoe
AT sudrandhir pther05endoscopicpancreaticnecrosectomywhytoscuffwhenyoucanflushthemuckmakeitaneasyrowtohoe
AT patlesaurabh pther05endoscopicpancreaticnecrosectomywhytoscuffwhenyoucanflushthemuckmakeitaneasyrowtohoe
AT guleriamridula pther05endoscopicpancreaticnecrosectomywhytoscuffwhenyoucanflushthemuckmakeitaneasyrowtohoe
AT sarinhaimanti pther05endoscopicpancreaticnecrosectomywhytoscuffwhenyoucanflushthemuckmakeitaneasyrowtohoe
AT kaurgagandeep pther05endoscopicpancreaticnecrosectomywhytoscuffwhenyoucanflushthemuckmakeitaneasyrowtohoe
AT prabhachandra pther05endoscopicpancreaticnecrosectomywhytoscuffwhenyoucanflushthemuckmakeitaneasyrowtohoe
AT bhatiasumit pther05endoscopicpancreaticnecrosectomywhytoscuffwhenyoucanflushthemuckmakeitaneasyrowtohoe