Cargando…
P-THER-05: Endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy: Why to scuff when you can flush the muck-make it an easy row to hoe
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage of symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON) followed by fully covered self-expanding metal stent (FCSEMS) placement offers several advantages such as higher technical success and option of necrosectomy. The aim was to eva...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5569803/ http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2303-9027.212303 |
_version_ | 1783259058805932032 |
---|---|
author | Bansal, Rinkesh Puri, Rajesh Choudhary, Narendra S. Sud, Randhir Patle, Saurabh Guleria, Mridula Sarin, Haimanti Kaur, Gagandeep Prabha, Chandra Bhatia, Sumit |
author_facet | Bansal, Rinkesh Puri, Rajesh Choudhary, Narendra S. Sud, Randhir Patle, Saurabh Guleria, Mridula Sarin, Haimanti Kaur, Gagandeep Prabha, Chandra Bhatia, Sumit |
author_sort | Bansal, Rinkesh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage of symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON) followed by fully covered self-expanding metal stent (FCSEMS) placement offers several advantages such as higher technical success and option of necrosectomy. The aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EUS-guided drainage of patients with WON using FCSEMS and intracavitary lavage with solution containing hydrogen peroxide by adopting a step-up approach. METHODS: A prospective open-label study was done at a single tertiary care center from January 2014 to January 2016. Patients with symptomatic WON who underwent EUS-guided drainage followed by FCSEMS placement were included in the study. Primary endpoints were complete drainage with improvement in symptoms or major adverse events. Secondary endpoints were minor adverse events related to procedures. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients (mean age 36 years; 52 males) were included. Technical success was achieved in 100% and clinical success was achieved in 90.6%. Complete drainage was achieved with FCSEMS alone in 18 (28.1%), FCSEMS with necrosectomy using lavage in 40 (62.5%), FCSEMS with percutaneous drainage in 5 (7.8%), and 1 (1.5%) patient required salvage surgery. Major adverse events were life-threatening bleeding in 3 (4.6%). Minor adverse events were nonlife-threatening bleeding in 2 (3.1%) patients and stent migration in 3 (4.6%) patients. CONCLUSION: EUS-guided WON drainage with FCSEMS followed by necrosectomy with lavage using solution containing hydrogen peroxide as a step-up approach is a minimally invasive and effective method with high technical and clinical success. Patients with solid debris >40% need aggressive management. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5569803 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55698032017-09-01 P-THER-05: Endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy: Why to scuff when you can flush the muck-make it an easy row to hoe Bansal, Rinkesh Puri, Rajesh Choudhary, Narendra S. Sud, Randhir Patle, Saurabh Guleria, Mridula Sarin, Haimanti Kaur, Gagandeep Prabha, Chandra Bhatia, Sumit Endosc Ultrasound Abstract BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage of symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON) followed by fully covered self-expanding metal stent (FCSEMS) placement offers several advantages such as higher technical success and option of necrosectomy. The aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EUS-guided drainage of patients with WON using FCSEMS and intracavitary lavage with solution containing hydrogen peroxide by adopting a step-up approach. METHODS: A prospective open-label study was done at a single tertiary care center from January 2014 to January 2016. Patients with symptomatic WON who underwent EUS-guided drainage followed by FCSEMS placement were included in the study. Primary endpoints were complete drainage with improvement in symptoms or major adverse events. Secondary endpoints were minor adverse events related to procedures. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients (mean age 36 years; 52 males) were included. Technical success was achieved in 100% and clinical success was achieved in 90.6%. Complete drainage was achieved with FCSEMS alone in 18 (28.1%), FCSEMS with necrosectomy using lavage in 40 (62.5%), FCSEMS with percutaneous drainage in 5 (7.8%), and 1 (1.5%) patient required salvage surgery. Major adverse events were life-threatening bleeding in 3 (4.6%). Minor adverse events were nonlife-threatening bleeding in 2 (3.1%) patients and stent migration in 3 (4.6%) patients. CONCLUSION: EUS-guided WON drainage with FCSEMS followed by necrosectomy with lavage using solution containing hydrogen peroxide as a step-up approach is a minimally invasive and effective method with high technical and clinical success. Patients with solid debris >40% need aggressive management. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5569803/ http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2303-9027.212303 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Endoscopic Ultrasound http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Abstract Bansal, Rinkesh Puri, Rajesh Choudhary, Narendra S. Sud, Randhir Patle, Saurabh Guleria, Mridula Sarin, Haimanti Kaur, Gagandeep Prabha, Chandra Bhatia, Sumit P-THER-05: Endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy: Why to scuff when you can flush the muck-make it an easy row to hoe |
title | P-THER-05: Endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy: Why to scuff when you can flush the muck-make it an easy row to hoe |
title_full | P-THER-05: Endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy: Why to scuff when you can flush the muck-make it an easy row to hoe |
title_fullStr | P-THER-05: Endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy: Why to scuff when you can flush the muck-make it an easy row to hoe |
title_full_unstemmed | P-THER-05: Endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy: Why to scuff when you can flush the muck-make it an easy row to hoe |
title_short | P-THER-05: Endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy: Why to scuff when you can flush the muck-make it an easy row to hoe |
title_sort | p-ther-05: endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy: why to scuff when you can flush the muck-make it an easy row to hoe |
topic | Abstract |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5569803/ http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2303-9027.212303 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bansalrinkesh pther05endoscopicpancreaticnecrosectomywhytoscuffwhenyoucanflushthemuckmakeitaneasyrowtohoe AT purirajesh pther05endoscopicpancreaticnecrosectomywhytoscuffwhenyoucanflushthemuckmakeitaneasyrowtohoe AT choudharynarendras pther05endoscopicpancreaticnecrosectomywhytoscuffwhenyoucanflushthemuckmakeitaneasyrowtohoe AT sudrandhir pther05endoscopicpancreaticnecrosectomywhytoscuffwhenyoucanflushthemuckmakeitaneasyrowtohoe AT patlesaurabh pther05endoscopicpancreaticnecrosectomywhytoscuffwhenyoucanflushthemuckmakeitaneasyrowtohoe AT guleriamridula pther05endoscopicpancreaticnecrosectomywhytoscuffwhenyoucanflushthemuckmakeitaneasyrowtohoe AT sarinhaimanti pther05endoscopicpancreaticnecrosectomywhytoscuffwhenyoucanflushthemuckmakeitaneasyrowtohoe AT kaurgagandeep pther05endoscopicpancreaticnecrosectomywhytoscuffwhenyoucanflushthemuckmakeitaneasyrowtohoe AT prabhachandra pther05endoscopicpancreaticnecrosectomywhytoscuffwhenyoucanflushthemuckmakeitaneasyrowtohoe AT bhatiasumit pther05endoscopicpancreaticnecrosectomywhytoscuffwhenyoucanflushthemuckmakeitaneasyrowtohoe |