Cargando…

Evaluation of the performance of deformable image registration between planning CT and CBCT images for the pelvic region: comparison between hybrid and intensity-based DIR

This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the hybrid deformable image registration (DIR) method in comparison with intensity-based DIR for pelvic cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, using intensity and anatomical information. Ten prostate cancer patients treated with intensity-modulat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takayama, Yoshiki, Kadoya, Noriyuki, Yamamoto, Takaya, Ito, Kengo, Chiba, Mizuki, Fujiwara, Kousei, Miyasaka, Yuya, Dobashi, Suguru, Sato, Kiyokazu, Takeda, Ken, Jingu, Keiichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5569957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28158642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrw123
_version_ 1783259087078686720
author Takayama, Yoshiki
Kadoya, Noriyuki
Yamamoto, Takaya
Ito, Kengo
Chiba, Mizuki
Fujiwara, Kousei
Miyasaka, Yuya
Dobashi, Suguru
Sato, Kiyokazu
Takeda, Ken
Jingu, Keiichi
author_facet Takayama, Yoshiki
Kadoya, Noriyuki
Yamamoto, Takaya
Ito, Kengo
Chiba, Mizuki
Fujiwara, Kousei
Miyasaka, Yuya
Dobashi, Suguru
Sato, Kiyokazu
Takeda, Ken
Jingu, Keiichi
author_sort Takayama, Yoshiki
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the hybrid deformable image registration (DIR) method in comparison with intensity-based DIR for pelvic cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, using intensity and anatomical information. Ten prostate cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) were studied. Nine or ten CBCT scans were performed for each patient. First, rigid registration was performed between the planning CT and all CBCT images using gold fiducial markers, and then DIR was performed. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and center of mass (COM) displacement were used to evaluate the quantitative DIR accuracy. The average DSCs for intensity-based DIR for the prostate, rectum, bladder, and seminal vesicles were 0.84 ± 0.05, 0.75 ± 0.05, 0.69 ± 0.07 and 0.65 ± 0.11, respectively, whereas those values for hybrid DIR were 0.98 ± 0.00, 0.97 ± 0.01, 0.98 ± 0.00 and 0.94 ± 0.03, respectively (P < 0.05). The average COM displacements for intensity-based DIR for the prostate, rectum, bladder, and seminal vesicles were 2.0 ± 1.5, 3.7 ± 1.4, 7.8 ± 2.2 and 3.6 ± 1.2 mm, whereas those values for hybrid DIR were 0.1 ± 0.0, 0.3 ± 0.2, 0.2 ± 0.1 and 0.6 ± 0.6 mm, respectively (P < 0.05). These results showed that the DSC for hybrid DIR had a higher DSC value and smaller COM displacement for all structures and all patients, compared with intensity-based DIR. Thus, the accumulative dose based on hybrid DIR might be trusted as a high-precision dose estimation method that takes into account organ movement during treatment radiotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5569957
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55699572017-08-29 Evaluation of the performance of deformable image registration between planning CT and CBCT images for the pelvic region: comparison between hybrid and intensity-based DIR Takayama, Yoshiki Kadoya, Noriyuki Yamamoto, Takaya Ito, Kengo Chiba, Mizuki Fujiwara, Kousei Miyasaka, Yuya Dobashi, Suguru Sato, Kiyokazu Takeda, Ken Jingu, Keiichi J Radiat Res Oncology This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the hybrid deformable image registration (DIR) method in comparison with intensity-based DIR for pelvic cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, using intensity and anatomical information. Ten prostate cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) were studied. Nine or ten CBCT scans were performed for each patient. First, rigid registration was performed between the planning CT and all CBCT images using gold fiducial markers, and then DIR was performed. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and center of mass (COM) displacement were used to evaluate the quantitative DIR accuracy. The average DSCs for intensity-based DIR for the prostate, rectum, bladder, and seminal vesicles were 0.84 ± 0.05, 0.75 ± 0.05, 0.69 ± 0.07 and 0.65 ± 0.11, respectively, whereas those values for hybrid DIR were 0.98 ± 0.00, 0.97 ± 0.01, 0.98 ± 0.00 and 0.94 ± 0.03, respectively (P < 0.05). The average COM displacements for intensity-based DIR for the prostate, rectum, bladder, and seminal vesicles were 2.0 ± 1.5, 3.7 ± 1.4, 7.8 ± 2.2 and 3.6 ± 1.2 mm, whereas those values for hybrid DIR were 0.1 ± 0.0, 0.3 ± 0.2, 0.2 ± 0.1 and 0.6 ± 0.6 mm, respectively (P < 0.05). These results showed that the DSC for hybrid DIR had a higher DSC value and smaller COM displacement for all structures and all patients, compared with intensity-based DIR. Thus, the accumulative dose based on hybrid DIR might be trusted as a high-precision dose estimation method that takes into account organ movement during treatment radiotherapy. Oxford University Press 2017-07 2017-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5569957/ /pubmed/28158642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrw123 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Oncology
Takayama, Yoshiki
Kadoya, Noriyuki
Yamamoto, Takaya
Ito, Kengo
Chiba, Mizuki
Fujiwara, Kousei
Miyasaka, Yuya
Dobashi, Suguru
Sato, Kiyokazu
Takeda, Ken
Jingu, Keiichi
Evaluation of the performance of deformable image registration between planning CT and CBCT images for the pelvic region: comparison between hybrid and intensity-based DIR
title Evaluation of the performance of deformable image registration between planning CT and CBCT images for the pelvic region: comparison between hybrid and intensity-based DIR
title_full Evaluation of the performance of deformable image registration between planning CT and CBCT images for the pelvic region: comparison between hybrid and intensity-based DIR
title_fullStr Evaluation of the performance of deformable image registration between planning CT and CBCT images for the pelvic region: comparison between hybrid and intensity-based DIR
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the performance of deformable image registration between planning CT and CBCT images for the pelvic region: comparison between hybrid and intensity-based DIR
title_short Evaluation of the performance of deformable image registration between planning CT and CBCT images for the pelvic region: comparison between hybrid and intensity-based DIR
title_sort evaluation of the performance of deformable image registration between planning ct and cbct images for the pelvic region: comparison between hybrid and intensity-based dir
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5569957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28158642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrw123
work_keys_str_mv AT takayamayoshiki evaluationoftheperformanceofdeformableimageregistrationbetweenplanningctandcbctimagesforthepelvicregioncomparisonbetweenhybridandintensitybaseddir
AT kadoyanoriyuki evaluationoftheperformanceofdeformableimageregistrationbetweenplanningctandcbctimagesforthepelvicregioncomparisonbetweenhybridandintensitybaseddir
AT yamamototakaya evaluationoftheperformanceofdeformableimageregistrationbetweenplanningctandcbctimagesforthepelvicregioncomparisonbetweenhybridandintensitybaseddir
AT itokengo evaluationoftheperformanceofdeformableimageregistrationbetweenplanningctandcbctimagesforthepelvicregioncomparisonbetweenhybridandintensitybaseddir
AT chibamizuki evaluationoftheperformanceofdeformableimageregistrationbetweenplanningctandcbctimagesforthepelvicregioncomparisonbetweenhybridandintensitybaseddir
AT fujiwarakousei evaluationoftheperformanceofdeformableimageregistrationbetweenplanningctandcbctimagesforthepelvicregioncomparisonbetweenhybridandintensitybaseddir
AT miyasakayuya evaluationoftheperformanceofdeformableimageregistrationbetweenplanningctandcbctimagesforthepelvicregioncomparisonbetweenhybridandintensitybaseddir
AT dobashisuguru evaluationoftheperformanceofdeformableimageregistrationbetweenplanningctandcbctimagesforthepelvicregioncomparisonbetweenhybridandintensitybaseddir
AT satokiyokazu evaluationoftheperformanceofdeformableimageregistrationbetweenplanningctandcbctimagesforthepelvicregioncomparisonbetweenhybridandintensitybaseddir
AT takedaken evaluationoftheperformanceofdeformableimageregistrationbetweenplanningctandcbctimagesforthepelvicregioncomparisonbetweenhybridandintensitybaseddir
AT jingukeiichi evaluationoftheperformanceofdeformableimageregistrationbetweenplanningctandcbctimagesforthepelvicregioncomparisonbetweenhybridandintensitybaseddir