Cargando…
Evaluation of the performance of deformable image registration between planning CT and CBCT images for the pelvic region: comparison between hybrid and intensity-based DIR
This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the hybrid deformable image registration (DIR) method in comparison with intensity-based DIR for pelvic cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, using intensity and anatomical information. Ten prostate cancer patients treated with intensity-modulat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5569957/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28158642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrw123 |
_version_ | 1783259087078686720 |
---|---|
author | Takayama, Yoshiki Kadoya, Noriyuki Yamamoto, Takaya Ito, Kengo Chiba, Mizuki Fujiwara, Kousei Miyasaka, Yuya Dobashi, Suguru Sato, Kiyokazu Takeda, Ken Jingu, Keiichi |
author_facet | Takayama, Yoshiki Kadoya, Noriyuki Yamamoto, Takaya Ito, Kengo Chiba, Mizuki Fujiwara, Kousei Miyasaka, Yuya Dobashi, Suguru Sato, Kiyokazu Takeda, Ken Jingu, Keiichi |
author_sort | Takayama, Yoshiki |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the hybrid deformable image registration (DIR) method in comparison with intensity-based DIR for pelvic cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, using intensity and anatomical information. Ten prostate cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) were studied. Nine or ten CBCT scans were performed for each patient. First, rigid registration was performed between the planning CT and all CBCT images using gold fiducial markers, and then DIR was performed. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and center of mass (COM) displacement were used to evaluate the quantitative DIR accuracy. The average DSCs for intensity-based DIR for the prostate, rectum, bladder, and seminal vesicles were 0.84 ± 0.05, 0.75 ± 0.05, 0.69 ± 0.07 and 0.65 ± 0.11, respectively, whereas those values for hybrid DIR were 0.98 ± 0.00, 0.97 ± 0.01, 0.98 ± 0.00 and 0.94 ± 0.03, respectively (P < 0.05). The average COM displacements for intensity-based DIR for the prostate, rectum, bladder, and seminal vesicles were 2.0 ± 1.5, 3.7 ± 1.4, 7.8 ± 2.2 and 3.6 ± 1.2 mm, whereas those values for hybrid DIR were 0.1 ± 0.0, 0.3 ± 0.2, 0.2 ± 0.1 and 0.6 ± 0.6 mm, respectively (P < 0.05). These results showed that the DSC for hybrid DIR had a higher DSC value and smaller COM displacement for all structures and all patients, compared with intensity-based DIR. Thus, the accumulative dose based on hybrid DIR might be trusted as a high-precision dose estimation method that takes into account organ movement during treatment radiotherapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5569957 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55699572017-08-29 Evaluation of the performance of deformable image registration between planning CT and CBCT images for the pelvic region: comparison between hybrid and intensity-based DIR Takayama, Yoshiki Kadoya, Noriyuki Yamamoto, Takaya Ito, Kengo Chiba, Mizuki Fujiwara, Kousei Miyasaka, Yuya Dobashi, Suguru Sato, Kiyokazu Takeda, Ken Jingu, Keiichi J Radiat Res Oncology This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the hybrid deformable image registration (DIR) method in comparison with intensity-based DIR for pelvic cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, using intensity and anatomical information. Ten prostate cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) were studied. Nine or ten CBCT scans were performed for each patient. First, rigid registration was performed between the planning CT and all CBCT images using gold fiducial markers, and then DIR was performed. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and center of mass (COM) displacement were used to evaluate the quantitative DIR accuracy. The average DSCs for intensity-based DIR for the prostate, rectum, bladder, and seminal vesicles were 0.84 ± 0.05, 0.75 ± 0.05, 0.69 ± 0.07 and 0.65 ± 0.11, respectively, whereas those values for hybrid DIR were 0.98 ± 0.00, 0.97 ± 0.01, 0.98 ± 0.00 and 0.94 ± 0.03, respectively (P < 0.05). The average COM displacements for intensity-based DIR for the prostate, rectum, bladder, and seminal vesicles were 2.0 ± 1.5, 3.7 ± 1.4, 7.8 ± 2.2 and 3.6 ± 1.2 mm, whereas those values for hybrid DIR were 0.1 ± 0.0, 0.3 ± 0.2, 0.2 ± 0.1 and 0.6 ± 0.6 mm, respectively (P < 0.05). These results showed that the DSC for hybrid DIR had a higher DSC value and smaller COM displacement for all structures and all patients, compared with intensity-based DIR. Thus, the accumulative dose based on hybrid DIR might be trusted as a high-precision dose estimation method that takes into account organ movement during treatment radiotherapy. Oxford University Press 2017-07 2017-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5569957/ /pubmed/28158642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrw123 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Takayama, Yoshiki Kadoya, Noriyuki Yamamoto, Takaya Ito, Kengo Chiba, Mizuki Fujiwara, Kousei Miyasaka, Yuya Dobashi, Suguru Sato, Kiyokazu Takeda, Ken Jingu, Keiichi Evaluation of the performance of deformable image registration between planning CT and CBCT images for the pelvic region: comparison between hybrid and intensity-based DIR |
title | Evaluation of the performance of deformable image registration between planning CT and CBCT images for the pelvic region: comparison between hybrid and intensity-based DIR |
title_full | Evaluation of the performance of deformable image registration between planning CT and CBCT images for the pelvic region: comparison between hybrid and intensity-based DIR |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the performance of deformable image registration between planning CT and CBCT images for the pelvic region: comparison between hybrid and intensity-based DIR |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the performance of deformable image registration between planning CT and CBCT images for the pelvic region: comparison between hybrid and intensity-based DIR |
title_short | Evaluation of the performance of deformable image registration between planning CT and CBCT images for the pelvic region: comparison between hybrid and intensity-based DIR |
title_sort | evaluation of the performance of deformable image registration between planning ct and cbct images for the pelvic region: comparison between hybrid and intensity-based dir |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5569957/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28158642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrw123 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT takayamayoshiki evaluationoftheperformanceofdeformableimageregistrationbetweenplanningctandcbctimagesforthepelvicregioncomparisonbetweenhybridandintensitybaseddir AT kadoyanoriyuki evaluationoftheperformanceofdeformableimageregistrationbetweenplanningctandcbctimagesforthepelvicregioncomparisonbetweenhybridandintensitybaseddir AT yamamototakaya evaluationoftheperformanceofdeformableimageregistrationbetweenplanningctandcbctimagesforthepelvicregioncomparisonbetweenhybridandintensitybaseddir AT itokengo evaluationoftheperformanceofdeformableimageregistrationbetweenplanningctandcbctimagesforthepelvicregioncomparisonbetweenhybridandintensitybaseddir AT chibamizuki evaluationoftheperformanceofdeformableimageregistrationbetweenplanningctandcbctimagesforthepelvicregioncomparisonbetweenhybridandintensitybaseddir AT fujiwarakousei evaluationoftheperformanceofdeformableimageregistrationbetweenplanningctandcbctimagesforthepelvicregioncomparisonbetweenhybridandintensitybaseddir AT miyasakayuya evaluationoftheperformanceofdeformableimageregistrationbetweenplanningctandcbctimagesforthepelvicregioncomparisonbetweenhybridandintensitybaseddir AT dobashisuguru evaluationoftheperformanceofdeformableimageregistrationbetweenplanningctandcbctimagesforthepelvicregioncomparisonbetweenhybridandintensitybaseddir AT satokiyokazu evaluationoftheperformanceofdeformableimageregistrationbetweenplanningctandcbctimagesforthepelvicregioncomparisonbetweenhybridandintensitybaseddir AT takedaken evaluationoftheperformanceofdeformableimageregistrationbetweenplanningctandcbctimagesforthepelvicregioncomparisonbetweenhybridandintensitybaseddir AT jingukeiichi evaluationoftheperformanceofdeformableimageregistrationbetweenplanningctandcbctimagesforthepelvicregioncomparisonbetweenhybridandintensitybaseddir |