Cargando…

A management method for the statistical results of patient-specific quality assurance for intensity-modulated radiation therapy

There are many reports concerning patient-specific quality assurance (QA) for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). However, reports about the statistical results of QA are lacking. Management methods for the results of the QA are needed, even though we have the ESTRO group recommendation th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakamura, Satoshi, Okamoto, Hiroyuki, Wakita, Akihisa, Umezawa, Rei, Takahashi, Kana, Inaba, Koji, Murakami, Naoya, Kato, Toru, Igaki, Hiroshi, Ito, Yoshinori, Abe, Yoshihisa, Itami, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5569959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27837121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrw107
_version_ 1783259087548448768
author Nakamura, Satoshi
Okamoto, Hiroyuki
Wakita, Akihisa
Umezawa, Rei
Takahashi, Kana
Inaba, Koji
Murakami, Naoya
Kato, Toru
Igaki, Hiroshi
Ito, Yoshinori
Abe, Yoshihisa
Itami, Jun
author_facet Nakamura, Satoshi
Okamoto, Hiroyuki
Wakita, Akihisa
Umezawa, Rei
Takahashi, Kana
Inaba, Koji
Murakami, Naoya
Kato, Toru
Igaki, Hiroshi
Ito, Yoshinori
Abe, Yoshihisa
Itami, Jun
author_sort Nakamura, Satoshi
collection PubMed
description There are many reports concerning patient-specific quality assurance (QA) for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). However, reports about the statistical results of QA are lacking. Management methods for the results of the QA are needed, even though we have the ESTRO group recommendation that a tolerance limit of 1.96 standard deviation (SD) be established in each institution. The purpose of this study was to establish a management method for determining the tolerance limit and to report the statistical results of patient-specific QA. From April 2006 to March 2015, five linacs in the National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan, were used to treat 1185 patients with IMRT. Patient-specific QA was performed using an ion chamber, films, and some detectors. To establish a management method for the results, differences between the measured and calculated doses in the ion chamber were analyzed for each linac, each phantom, and each treatment site. The overall mean dose difference was 0.5 ± 1.3%, and the mean dose difference in each linac was 0.6 ± 1.2%, 0.9 ± 1.3%, −0.4 ± 1.4%, −0.1 ± 1.2% and −0.1 ± 0.9%. The difference between linacs and between treatment sites was significant (P < 0.001 and 0.01, respectively). The proportion of the dose difference within ±3% was 97.7%, and that was improved from 2006 to 2014. The results of the patient-specific QA should be managed for each linac and each treatment site in order to decide the suitable tolerance limit. Reports of statistical results will be helped if a new tolerance limit and action level will be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5569959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55699592017-08-29 A management method for the statistical results of patient-specific quality assurance for intensity-modulated radiation therapy Nakamura, Satoshi Okamoto, Hiroyuki Wakita, Akihisa Umezawa, Rei Takahashi, Kana Inaba, Koji Murakami, Naoya Kato, Toru Igaki, Hiroshi Ito, Yoshinori Abe, Yoshihisa Itami, Jun J Radiat Res Oncology There are many reports concerning patient-specific quality assurance (QA) for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). However, reports about the statistical results of QA are lacking. Management methods for the results of the QA are needed, even though we have the ESTRO group recommendation that a tolerance limit of 1.96 standard deviation (SD) be established in each institution. The purpose of this study was to establish a management method for determining the tolerance limit and to report the statistical results of patient-specific QA. From April 2006 to March 2015, five linacs in the National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan, were used to treat 1185 patients with IMRT. Patient-specific QA was performed using an ion chamber, films, and some detectors. To establish a management method for the results, differences between the measured and calculated doses in the ion chamber were analyzed for each linac, each phantom, and each treatment site. The overall mean dose difference was 0.5 ± 1.3%, and the mean dose difference in each linac was 0.6 ± 1.2%, 0.9 ± 1.3%, −0.4 ± 1.4%, −0.1 ± 1.2% and −0.1 ± 0.9%. The difference between linacs and between treatment sites was significant (P < 0.001 and 0.01, respectively). The proportion of the dose difference within ±3% was 97.7%, and that was improved from 2006 to 2014. The results of the patient-specific QA should be managed for each linac and each treatment site in order to decide the suitable tolerance limit. Reports of statistical results will be helped if a new tolerance limit and action level will be considered. Oxford University Press 2017-07 2016-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5569959/ /pubmed/27837121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrw107 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Oncology
Nakamura, Satoshi
Okamoto, Hiroyuki
Wakita, Akihisa
Umezawa, Rei
Takahashi, Kana
Inaba, Koji
Murakami, Naoya
Kato, Toru
Igaki, Hiroshi
Ito, Yoshinori
Abe, Yoshihisa
Itami, Jun
A management method for the statistical results of patient-specific quality assurance for intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title A management method for the statistical results of patient-specific quality assurance for intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title_full A management method for the statistical results of patient-specific quality assurance for intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title_fullStr A management method for the statistical results of patient-specific quality assurance for intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title_full_unstemmed A management method for the statistical results of patient-specific quality assurance for intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title_short A management method for the statistical results of patient-specific quality assurance for intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title_sort management method for the statistical results of patient-specific quality assurance for intensity-modulated radiation therapy
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5569959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27837121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrw107
work_keys_str_mv AT nakamurasatoshi amanagementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT okamotohiroyuki amanagementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT wakitaakihisa amanagementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT umezawarei amanagementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT takahashikana amanagementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT inabakoji amanagementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT murakaminaoya amanagementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT katotoru amanagementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT igakihiroshi amanagementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT itoyoshinori amanagementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT abeyoshihisa amanagementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT itamijun amanagementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT nakamurasatoshi managementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT okamotohiroyuki managementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT wakitaakihisa managementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT umezawarei managementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT takahashikana managementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT inabakoji managementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT murakaminaoya managementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT katotoru managementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT igakihiroshi managementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT itoyoshinori managementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT abeyoshihisa managementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT itamijun managementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy