Cargando…
A management method for the statistical results of patient-specific quality assurance for intensity-modulated radiation therapy
There are many reports concerning patient-specific quality assurance (QA) for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). However, reports about the statistical results of QA are lacking. Management methods for the results of the QA are needed, even though we have the ESTRO group recommendation th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5569959/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27837121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrw107 |
_version_ | 1783259087548448768 |
---|---|
author | Nakamura, Satoshi Okamoto, Hiroyuki Wakita, Akihisa Umezawa, Rei Takahashi, Kana Inaba, Koji Murakami, Naoya Kato, Toru Igaki, Hiroshi Ito, Yoshinori Abe, Yoshihisa Itami, Jun |
author_facet | Nakamura, Satoshi Okamoto, Hiroyuki Wakita, Akihisa Umezawa, Rei Takahashi, Kana Inaba, Koji Murakami, Naoya Kato, Toru Igaki, Hiroshi Ito, Yoshinori Abe, Yoshihisa Itami, Jun |
author_sort | Nakamura, Satoshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | There are many reports concerning patient-specific quality assurance (QA) for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). However, reports about the statistical results of QA are lacking. Management methods for the results of the QA are needed, even though we have the ESTRO group recommendation that a tolerance limit of 1.96 standard deviation (SD) be established in each institution. The purpose of this study was to establish a management method for determining the tolerance limit and to report the statistical results of patient-specific QA. From April 2006 to March 2015, five linacs in the National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan, were used to treat 1185 patients with IMRT. Patient-specific QA was performed using an ion chamber, films, and some detectors. To establish a management method for the results, differences between the measured and calculated doses in the ion chamber were analyzed for each linac, each phantom, and each treatment site. The overall mean dose difference was 0.5 ± 1.3%, and the mean dose difference in each linac was 0.6 ± 1.2%, 0.9 ± 1.3%, −0.4 ± 1.4%, −0.1 ± 1.2% and −0.1 ± 0.9%. The difference between linacs and between treatment sites was significant (P < 0.001 and 0.01, respectively). The proportion of the dose difference within ±3% was 97.7%, and that was improved from 2006 to 2014. The results of the patient-specific QA should be managed for each linac and each treatment site in order to decide the suitable tolerance limit. Reports of statistical results will be helped if a new tolerance limit and action level will be considered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5569959 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55699592017-08-29 A management method for the statistical results of patient-specific quality assurance for intensity-modulated radiation therapy Nakamura, Satoshi Okamoto, Hiroyuki Wakita, Akihisa Umezawa, Rei Takahashi, Kana Inaba, Koji Murakami, Naoya Kato, Toru Igaki, Hiroshi Ito, Yoshinori Abe, Yoshihisa Itami, Jun J Radiat Res Oncology There are many reports concerning patient-specific quality assurance (QA) for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). However, reports about the statistical results of QA are lacking. Management methods for the results of the QA are needed, even though we have the ESTRO group recommendation that a tolerance limit of 1.96 standard deviation (SD) be established in each institution. The purpose of this study was to establish a management method for determining the tolerance limit and to report the statistical results of patient-specific QA. From April 2006 to March 2015, five linacs in the National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan, were used to treat 1185 patients with IMRT. Patient-specific QA was performed using an ion chamber, films, and some detectors. To establish a management method for the results, differences between the measured and calculated doses in the ion chamber were analyzed for each linac, each phantom, and each treatment site. The overall mean dose difference was 0.5 ± 1.3%, and the mean dose difference in each linac was 0.6 ± 1.2%, 0.9 ± 1.3%, −0.4 ± 1.4%, −0.1 ± 1.2% and −0.1 ± 0.9%. The difference between linacs and between treatment sites was significant (P < 0.001 and 0.01, respectively). The proportion of the dose difference within ±3% was 97.7%, and that was improved from 2006 to 2014. The results of the patient-specific QA should be managed for each linac and each treatment site in order to decide the suitable tolerance limit. Reports of statistical results will be helped if a new tolerance limit and action level will be considered. Oxford University Press 2017-07 2016-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5569959/ /pubmed/27837121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrw107 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Oncology Nakamura, Satoshi Okamoto, Hiroyuki Wakita, Akihisa Umezawa, Rei Takahashi, Kana Inaba, Koji Murakami, Naoya Kato, Toru Igaki, Hiroshi Ito, Yoshinori Abe, Yoshihisa Itami, Jun A management method for the statistical results of patient-specific quality assurance for intensity-modulated radiation therapy |
title | A management method for the statistical results of patient-specific quality assurance for intensity-modulated radiation therapy |
title_full | A management method for the statistical results of patient-specific quality assurance for intensity-modulated radiation therapy |
title_fullStr | A management method for the statistical results of patient-specific quality assurance for intensity-modulated radiation therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | A management method for the statistical results of patient-specific quality assurance for intensity-modulated radiation therapy |
title_short | A management method for the statistical results of patient-specific quality assurance for intensity-modulated radiation therapy |
title_sort | management method for the statistical results of patient-specific quality assurance for intensity-modulated radiation therapy |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5569959/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27837121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrw107 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nakamurasatoshi amanagementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy AT okamotohiroyuki amanagementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy AT wakitaakihisa amanagementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy AT umezawarei amanagementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy AT takahashikana amanagementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy AT inabakoji amanagementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy AT murakaminaoya amanagementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy AT katotoru amanagementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy AT igakihiroshi amanagementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy AT itoyoshinori amanagementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy AT abeyoshihisa amanagementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy AT itamijun amanagementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy AT nakamurasatoshi managementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy AT okamotohiroyuki managementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy AT wakitaakihisa managementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy AT umezawarei managementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy AT takahashikana managementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy AT inabakoji managementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy AT murakaminaoya managementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy AT katotoru managementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy AT igakihiroshi managementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy AT itoyoshinori managementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy AT abeyoshihisa managementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy AT itamijun managementmethodforthestatisticalresultsofpatientspecificqualityassuranceforintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy |