Cargando…

Intravenous cyclophosphamide and oral prednisolone is a safe and effective treatment option for idiopathic membranous nephropathy

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) is one of the most common causes of nephrotic syndrome in adults. A proportion of patients will experience spontaneous remission and the decision to offer immunosuppression is guided by the presence of adverse prognostic features. Data relating to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mathrani, Vinod, Alejmi, Abdulfattah, Griffin, Siân, Roberts, Gareth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5570044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28852480
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfw152
_version_ 1783259105928937472
author Mathrani, Vinod
Alejmi, Abdulfattah
Griffin, Siân
Roberts, Gareth
author_facet Mathrani, Vinod
Alejmi, Abdulfattah
Griffin, Siân
Roberts, Gareth
author_sort Mathrani, Vinod
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) is one of the most common causes of nephrotic syndrome in adults. A proportion of patients will experience spontaneous remission and the decision to offer immunosuppression is guided by the presence of adverse prognostic features. Data relating to the efficacy of different immunosuppressive protocols is lacking, in particular there are little data available on the efficacy or benefits of an intravenous (IV) cyclophosphamide-based regimen. Since 2010, our unit has been using a treatment regimen based on IV cyclophosphamide and oral prednisolone for patients with IMN associated with adverse prognostic features. The outcomes of these patients were compared with a historic cohort of similar patients who did not receive immunosuppressive therapy. METHODS: Between January 2010 and 2014, a total of 41 patients were treated with pulse IV cyclophosphamide and oral prednisolone. The historical comparator group included 47 similar patients diagnosed between 2006 and 2010 who did not receive immunosuppression. Two-year follow-up data were collected. The primary outcome measure was time to remission of nephrotic syndrome (defined as normalization of serum albumin). Secondary outcomes included rate of progression of kidney disease as well as incidence of treatment-related adverse events. RESULTS: As compared with supportive care alone, treatment with IV cyclophosphamide and oral prednisolone was associated with a significantly higher number of patients achieving remission. Within 18 months of therapy, 74% of treated patients had achieved a normal serum albumin level. Though there was a trend towards a more rapid decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate in the untreated cohort, this did not reach statistical significance. The IV cyclophosphamide-based regimen was well tolerated, with few significant treatment-associated side effects. CONCLUSION: IV cyclophosphamide is a safe and effective treatment for IMN.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5570044
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55700442017-08-29 Intravenous cyclophosphamide and oral prednisolone is a safe and effective treatment option for idiopathic membranous nephropathy Mathrani, Vinod Alejmi, Abdulfattah Griffin, Siân Roberts, Gareth Clin Kidney J Glomerular Disease BACKGROUND: Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) is one of the most common causes of nephrotic syndrome in adults. A proportion of patients will experience spontaneous remission and the decision to offer immunosuppression is guided by the presence of adverse prognostic features. Data relating to the efficacy of different immunosuppressive protocols is lacking, in particular there are little data available on the efficacy or benefits of an intravenous (IV) cyclophosphamide-based regimen. Since 2010, our unit has been using a treatment regimen based on IV cyclophosphamide and oral prednisolone for patients with IMN associated with adverse prognostic features. The outcomes of these patients were compared with a historic cohort of similar patients who did not receive immunosuppressive therapy. METHODS: Between January 2010 and 2014, a total of 41 patients were treated with pulse IV cyclophosphamide and oral prednisolone. The historical comparator group included 47 similar patients diagnosed between 2006 and 2010 who did not receive immunosuppression. Two-year follow-up data were collected. The primary outcome measure was time to remission of nephrotic syndrome (defined as normalization of serum albumin). Secondary outcomes included rate of progression of kidney disease as well as incidence of treatment-related adverse events. RESULTS: As compared with supportive care alone, treatment with IV cyclophosphamide and oral prednisolone was associated with a significantly higher number of patients achieving remission. Within 18 months of therapy, 74% of treated patients had achieved a normal serum albumin level. Though there was a trend towards a more rapid decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate in the untreated cohort, this did not reach statistical significance. The IV cyclophosphamide-based regimen was well tolerated, with few significant treatment-associated side effects. CONCLUSION: IV cyclophosphamide is a safe and effective treatment for IMN. Oxford University Press 2017-08 2017-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5570044/ /pubmed/28852480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfw152 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Glomerular Disease
Mathrani, Vinod
Alejmi, Abdulfattah
Griffin, Siân
Roberts, Gareth
Intravenous cyclophosphamide and oral prednisolone is a safe and effective treatment option for idiopathic membranous nephropathy
title Intravenous cyclophosphamide and oral prednisolone is a safe and effective treatment option for idiopathic membranous nephropathy
title_full Intravenous cyclophosphamide and oral prednisolone is a safe and effective treatment option for idiopathic membranous nephropathy
title_fullStr Intravenous cyclophosphamide and oral prednisolone is a safe and effective treatment option for idiopathic membranous nephropathy
title_full_unstemmed Intravenous cyclophosphamide and oral prednisolone is a safe and effective treatment option for idiopathic membranous nephropathy
title_short Intravenous cyclophosphamide and oral prednisolone is a safe and effective treatment option for idiopathic membranous nephropathy
title_sort intravenous cyclophosphamide and oral prednisolone is a safe and effective treatment option for idiopathic membranous nephropathy
topic Glomerular Disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5570044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28852480
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfw152
work_keys_str_mv AT mathranivinod intravenouscyclophosphamideandoralprednisoloneisasafeandeffectivetreatmentoptionforidiopathicmembranousnephropathy
AT alejmiabdulfattah intravenouscyclophosphamideandoralprednisoloneisasafeandeffectivetreatmentoptionforidiopathicmembranousnephropathy
AT griffinsian intravenouscyclophosphamideandoralprednisoloneisasafeandeffectivetreatmentoptionforidiopathicmembranousnephropathy
AT robertsgareth intravenouscyclophosphamideandoralprednisoloneisasafeandeffectivetreatmentoptionforidiopathicmembranousnephropathy