Cargando…

Intra-individual comparison between abdominal virtual mono-energetic spectral and conventional images using a novel spectral detector CT

OBJECTIVES: To quantitatively and qualitatively assess abdominal arterial and venous phase contrast-enhanced spectral detector computed tomography (SDCT) virtual mono-energetic (MonoE) datasets in comparison to conventional CT reconstructions provided by the same system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Conve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doerner, Jonas, Wybranski, Christian, Byrtus, Jonathan, Houbois, Christian, Hauger, Myriam, Heneweer, Carola, Siedek, Florian, Hickethier, Tilman, Große Hokamp, Nils, Maintz, David, Haneder, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5570320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28837641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183759
_version_ 1783259158704816128
author Doerner, Jonas
Wybranski, Christian
Byrtus, Jonathan
Houbois, Christian
Hauger, Myriam
Heneweer, Carola
Siedek, Florian
Hickethier, Tilman
Große Hokamp, Nils
Maintz, David
Haneder, Stefan
author_facet Doerner, Jonas
Wybranski, Christian
Byrtus, Jonathan
Houbois, Christian
Hauger, Myriam
Heneweer, Carola
Siedek, Florian
Hickethier, Tilman
Große Hokamp, Nils
Maintz, David
Haneder, Stefan
author_sort Doerner, Jonas
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To quantitatively and qualitatively assess abdominal arterial and venous phase contrast-enhanced spectral detector computed tomography (SDCT) virtual mono-energetic (MonoE) datasets in comparison to conventional CT reconstructions provided by the same system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Conventional and MonoE images at 40–120 kilo-electron volt (keV) levels with a 10 keV increment as well as 160 and 200 keV were reconstructed in abdominal SDCT datasets of 55 patients. Attenuation, image noise, and contrast- / signal-to-noise ratios (CNR, SNR) of vessels and solid organs were compared between MonoE and conventional reconstructions. Two readers assessed contrast conditions, detail visualization, overall image quality and subjective image noise with both, fixed and adjustable window settings. RESULTS: Attenuation, CNR and SNR of vessels and solid organs showed a stepwise increase from high to low keV reconstructions in both contrast phases while image noise stayed stable at low keV MonoE reconstruction levels. Highest levels were found at 40 keV MonoE reconstruction (p<0.001), respectively. Solid abdominal organs showed a stepwise decrease from low to high energy levels in regard to attenuation, CNR and SNR with significantly higher values at 40 and 50 keV, compared to conventional images. The 70 keV MonoE was comparable to conventional poly-energetic reconstruction (p≥0.99). Subjective analysis displayed best image quality for the 70 keV MonoE reconstruction level in both phases at fixed standard window presets and at 40 keV if window settings could be adjusted. CONCLUSION: SDCT derived low keV MonoE showed markedly increased CNR and SNR values due to constantly low image noise values over the whole energy spectrum from 40 to 200 keV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5570320
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55703202017-09-09 Intra-individual comparison between abdominal virtual mono-energetic spectral and conventional images using a novel spectral detector CT Doerner, Jonas Wybranski, Christian Byrtus, Jonathan Houbois, Christian Hauger, Myriam Heneweer, Carola Siedek, Florian Hickethier, Tilman Große Hokamp, Nils Maintz, David Haneder, Stefan PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: To quantitatively and qualitatively assess abdominal arterial and venous phase contrast-enhanced spectral detector computed tomography (SDCT) virtual mono-energetic (MonoE) datasets in comparison to conventional CT reconstructions provided by the same system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Conventional and MonoE images at 40–120 kilo-electron volt (keV) levels with a 10 keV increment as well as 160 and 200 keV were reconstructed in abdominal SDCT datasets of 55 patients. Attenuation, image noise, and contrast- / signal-to-noise ratios (CNR, SNR) of vessels and solid organs were compared between MonoE and conventional reconstructions. Two readers assessed contrast conditions, detail visualization, overall image quality and subjective image noise with both, fixed and adjustable window settings. RESULTS: Attenuation, CNR and SNR of vessels and solid organs showed a stepwise increase from high to low keV reconstructions in both contrast phases while image noise stayed stable at low keV MonoE reconstruction levels. Highest levels were found at 40 keV MonoE reconstruction (p<0.001), respectively. Solid abdominal organs showed a stepwise decrease from low to high energy levels in regard to attenuation, CNR and SNR with significantly higher values at 40 and 50 keV, compared to conventional images. The 70 keV MonoE was comparable to conventional poly-energetic reconstruction (p≥0.99). Subjective analysis displayed best image quality for the 70 keV MonoE reconstruction level in both phases at fixed standard window presets and at 40 keV if window settings could be adjusted. CONCLUSION: SDCT derived low keV MonoE showed markedly increased CNR and SNR values due to constantly low image noise values over the whole energy spectrum from 40 to 200 keV. Public Library of Science 2017-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5570320/ /pubmed/28837641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183759 Text en © 2017 Doerner et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Doerner, Jonas
Wybranski, Christian
Byrtus, Jonathan
Houbois, Christian
Hauger, Myriam
Heneweer, Carola
Siedek, Florian
Hickethier, Tilman
Große Hokamp, Nils
Maintz, David
Haneder, Stefan
Intra-individual comparison between abdominal virtual mono-energetic spectral and conventional images using a novel spectral detector CT
title Intra-individual comparison between abdominal virtual mono-energetic spectral and conventional images using a novel spectral detector CT
title_full Intra-individual comparison between abdominal virtual mono-energetic spectral and conventional images using a novel spectral detector CT
title_fullStr Intra-individual comparison between abdominal virtual mono-energetic spectral and conventional images using a novel spectral detector CT
title_full_unstemmed Intra-individual comparison between abdominal virtual mono-energetic spectral and conventional images using a novel spectral detector CT
title_short Intra-individual comparison between abdominal virtual mono-energetic spectral and conventional images using a novel spectral detector CT
title_sort intra-individual comparison between abdominal virtual mono-energetic spectral and conventional images using a novel spectral detector ct
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5570320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28837641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183759
work_keys_str_mv AT doernerjonas intraindividualcomparisonbetweenabdominalvirtualmonoenergeticspectralandconventionalimagesusinganovelspectraldetectorct
AT wybranskichristian intraindividualcomparisonbetweenabdominalvirtualmonoenergeticspectralandconventionalimagesusinganovelspectraldetectorct
AT byrtusjonathan intraindividualcomparisonbetweenabdominalvirtualmonoenergeticspectralandconventionalimagesusinganovelspectraldetectorct
AT houboischristian intraindividualcomparisonbetweenabdominalvirtualmonoenergeticspectralandconventionalimagesusinganovelspectraldetectorct
AT haugermyriam intraindividualcomparisonbetweenabdominalvirtualmonoenergeticspectralandconventionalimagesusinganovelspectraldetectorct
AT heneweercarola intraindividualcomparisonbetweenabdominalvirtualmonoenergeticspectralandconventionalimagesusinganovelspectraldetectorct
AT siedekflorian intraindividualcomparisonbetweenabdominalvirtualmonoenergeticspectralandconventionalimagesusinganovelspectraldetectorct
AT hickethiertilman intraindividualcomparisonbetweenabdominalvirtualmonoenergeticspectralandconventionalimagesusinganovelspectraldetectorct
AT großehokampnils intraindividualcomparisonbetweenabdominalvirtualmonoenergeticspectralandconventionalimagesusinganovelspectraldetectorct
AT maintzdavid intraindividualcomparisonbetweenabdominalvirtualmonoenergeticspectralandconventionalimagesusinganovelspectraldetectorct
AT hanederstefan intraindividualcomparisonbetweenabdominalvirtualmonoenergeticspectralandconventionalimagesusinganovelspectraldetectorct