Cargando…

Replication fork slowing and stalling are distinct, checkpoint-independent consequences of replicating damaged DNA

In response to DNA damage during S phase, cells slow DNA replication. This slowing is orchestrated by the intra-S checkpoint and involves inhibition of origin firing and reduction of replication fork speed. Slowing of replication allows for tolerance of DNA damage and suppresses genomic instability....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iyer, Divya Ramalingam, Rhind, Nicholas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5570505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28806726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006958
_version_ 1783259190723084288
author Iyer, Divya Ramalingam
Rhind, Nicholas
author_facet Iyer, Divya Ramalingam
Rhind, Nicholas
author_sort Iyer, Divya Ramalingam
collection PubMed
description In response to DNA damage during S phase, cells slow DNA replication. This slowing is orchestrated by the intra-S checkpoint and involves inhibition of origin firing and reduction of replication fork speed. Slowing of replication allows for tolerance of DNA damage and suppresses genomic instability. Although the mechanisms of origin inhibition by the intra-S checkpoint are understood, major questions remain about how the checkpoint regulates replication forks: Does the checkpoint regulate the rate of fork progression? Does the checkpoint affect all forks, or only those encountering damage? Does the checkpoint facilitate the replication of polymerase-blocking lesions? To address these questions, we have analyzed the checkpoint in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe using a single-molecule DNA combing assay, which allows us to unambiguously separate the contribution of origin and fork regulation towards replication slowing, and allows us to investigate the behavior of individual forks. Moreover, we have interrogated the role of forks interacting with individual sites of damage by using three damaging agents—MMS, 4NQO and bleomycin—that cause similar levels of replication slowing with very different frequency of DNA lesions. We find that the checkpoint slows replication by inhibiting origin firing, but not by decreasing fork rates. However, the checkpoint appears to facilitate replication of damaged templates, allowing forks to more quickly pass lesions. Finally, using a novel analytic approach, we rigorously identify fork stalling events in our combing data and show that they play a previously unappreciated role in shaping replication kinetics in response to DNA damage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5570505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55705052017-08-28 Replication fork slowing and stalling are distinct, checkpoint-independent consequences of replicating damaged DNA Iyer, Divya Ramalingam Rhind, Nicholas PLoS Genet Research Article In response to DNA damage during S phase, cells slow DNA replication. This slowing is orchestrated by the intra-S checkpoint and involves inhibition of origin firing and reduction of replication fork speed. Slowing of replication allows for tolerance of DNA damage and suppresses genomic instability. Although the mechanisms of origin inhibition by the intra-S checkpoint are understood, major questions remain about how the checkpoint regulates replication forks: Does the checkpoint regulate the rate of fork progression? Does the checkpoint affect all forks, or only those encountering damage? Does the checkpoint facilitate the replication of polymerase-blocking lesions? To address these questions, we have analyzed the checkpoint in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe using a single-molecule DNA combing assay, which allows us to unambiguously separate the contribution of origin and fork regulation towards replication slowing, and allows us to investigate the behavior of individual forks. Moreover, we have interrogated the role of forks interacting with individual sites of damage by using three damaging agents—MMS, 4NQO and bleomycin—that cause similar levels of replication slowing with very different frequency of DNA lesions. We find that the checkpoint slows replication by inhibiting origin firing, but not by decreasing fork rates. However, the checkpoint appears to facilitate replication of damaged templates, allowing forks to more quickly pass lesions. Finally, using a novel analytic approach, we rigorously identify fork stalling events in our combing data and show that they play a previously unappreciated role in shaping replication kinetics in response to DNA damage. Public Library of Science 2017-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5570505/ /pubmed/28806726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006958 Text en © 2017 Iyer, Rhind http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Iyer, Divya Ramalingam
Rhind, Nicholas
Replication fork slowing and stalling are distinct, checkpoint-independent consequences of replicating damaged DNA
title Replication fork slowing and stalling are distinct, checkpoint-independent consequences of replicating damaged DNA
title_full Replication fork slowing and stalling are distinct, checkpoint-independent consequences of replicating damaged DNA
title_fullStr Replication fork slowing and stalling are distinct, checkpoint-independent consequences of replicating damaged DNA
title_full_unstemmed Replication fork slowing and stalling are distinct, checkpoint-independent consequences of replicating damaged DNA
title_short Replication fork slowing and stalling are distinct, checkpoint-independent consequences of replicating damaged DNA
title_sort replication fork slowing and stalling are distinct, checkpoint-independent consequences of replicating damaged dna
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5570505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28806726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006958
work_keys_str_mv AT iyerdivyaramalingam replicationforkslowingandstallingaredistinctcheckpointindependentconsequencesofreplicatingdamageddna
AT rhindnicholas replicationforkslowingandstallingaredistinctcheckpointindependentconsequencesofreplicatingdamageddna