Cargando…

Fractionation of sulfur (S) in beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest soils in relation to distance from the stem base as useful tool for modeling S biogeochemistry

The investigation of the fractionation of S compounds in forest soils is a powerful tool for interpreting S dynamics and S biogeochemistry in forest ecosystems. Beech stands on high pH (nutrient-rich) sites on Flysch and on low pH (nutrient-poor) sites on Molasse were selected for testing the influe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hanousek, Ondrej, Prohaska, Thomas, Kulhanek, Martin, Balik, Jiri, Tejnecky, Vaclav, Berger, Torsten W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5570529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28848804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40808-017-0353-5
_version_ 1783259193173606400
author Hanousek, Ondrej
Prohaska, Thomas
Kulhanek, Martin
Balik, Jiri
Tejnecky, Vaclav
Berger, Torsten W.
author_facet Hanousek, Ondrej
Prohaska, Thomas
Kulhanek, Martin
Balik, Jiri
Tejnecky, Vaclav
Berger, Torsten W.
author_sort Hanousek, Ondrej
collection PubMed
description The investigation of the fractionation of S compounds in forest soils is a powerful tool for interpreting S dynamics and S biogeochemistry in forest ecosystems. Beech stands on high pH (nutrient-rich) sites on Flysch and on low pH (nutrient-poor) sites on Molasse were selected for testing the influence of stemflow, which represents a high input of water and dissolved elements to the soil, on spatial patterns of sulfur (S) fractions. Soil cores were taken at six distances from a beech stem per site at 55 cm uphill and at 27, 55, 100, 150 and 300 cm downhill from the stem. The cores were divided into the mineral soil horizons 0–3, 3–10, 10–20, 20–30 and 30–50 cm. Soil samples were characterized for pH, C(org), pedogenic Al and Fe oxides and S fractions. Sequential extraction by NH(4)Cl, NH(4)H(2)PO(4) and HCl yielded readily available sulfate-S (RAS), adsorbed sulfate-S (AS) and HCl-soluble sulfate-S (HCS). Organic sulfur (OS) was estimated as the difference between total sulfur (ToS) and inorganic sulfur (RAS + AS + HCS). Organic sulfur was further divided into ester sulfate-S (ES, HI-reduction) and carbon bonded sulfur (CS). On Flysch, RAS represented 3–6%, AS 2–12%, HCS 0–8% and OS 81–95% of ToS. On Molasse, RAS amounted 1–6%, AS 1–60%, HCS 0–8% and OS 37–95% of ToS. Spatial S distribution patterns with respect to the distance from the tree stem base could be clearly observed at all investigated sites. The presented data is a contribution to current reports on negative input–output S budgets of forest watersheds, suggesting that mineralization of OS on nutrient rich soils and desorption of historic AS on nutrient-poor soils are the dominant S sources, which have to be considered in future modeling of sulfur.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5570529
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55705292017-09-01 Fractionation of sulfur (S) in beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest soils in relation to distance from the stem base as useful tool for modeling S biogeochemistry Hanousek, Ondrej Prohaska, Thomas Kulhanek, Martin Balik, Jiri Tejnecky, Vaclav Berger, Torsten W. Model Earth Syst Environ Original Article The investigation of the fractionation of S compounds in forest soils is a powerful tool for interpreting S dynamics and S biogeochemistry in forest ecosystems. Beech stands on high pH (nutrient-rich) sites on Flysch and on low pH (nutrient-poor) sites on Molasse were selected for testing the influence of stemflow, which represents a high input of water and dissolved elements to the soil, on spatial patterns of sulfur (S) fractions. Soil cores were taken at six distances from a beech stem per site at 55 cm uphill and at 27, 55, 100, 150 and 300 cm downhill from the stem. The cores were divided into the mineral soil horizons 0–3, 3–10, 10–20, 20–30 and 30–50 cm. Soil samples were characterized for pH, C(org), pedogenic Al and Fe oxides and S fractions. Sequential extraction by NH(4)Cl, NH(4)H(2)PO(4) and HCl yielded readily available sulfate-S (RAS), adsorbed sulfate-S (AS) and HCl-soluble sulfate-S (HCS). Organic sulfur (OS) was estimated as the difference between total sulfur (ToS) and inorganic sulfur (RAS + AS + HCS). Organic sulfur was further divided into ester sulfate-S (ES, HI-reduction) and carbon bonded sulfur (CS). On Flysch, RAS represented 3–6%, AS 2–12%, HCS 0–8% and OS 81–95% of ToS. On Molasse, RAS amounted 1–6%, AS 1–60%, HCS 0–8% and OS 37–95% of ToS. Spatial S distribution patterns with respect to the distance from the tree stem base could be clearly observed at all investigated sites. The presented data is a contribution to current reports on negative input–output S budgets of forest watersheds, suggesting that mineralization of OS on nutrient rich soils and desorption of historic AS on nutrient-poor soils are the dominant S sources, which have to be considered in future modeling of sulfur. Springer International Publishing 2017-08-09 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5570529/ /pubmed/28848804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40808-017-0353-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hanousek, Ondrej
Prohaska, Thomas
Kulhanek, Martin
Balik, Jiri
Tejnecky, Vaclav
Berger, Torsten W.
Fractionation of sulfur (S) in beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest soils in relation to distance from the stem base as useful tool for modeling S biogeochemistry
title Fractionation of sulfur (S) in beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest soils in relation to distance from the stem base as useful tool for modeling S biogeochemistry
title_full Fractionation of sulfur (S) in beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest soils in relation to distance from the stem base as useful tool for modeling S biogeochemistry
title_fullStr Fractionation of sulfur (S) in beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest soils in relation to distance from the stem base as useful tool for modeling S biogeochemistry
title_full_unstemmed Fractionation of sulfur (S) in beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest soils in relation to distance from the stem base as useful tool for modeling S biogeochemistry
title_short Fractionation of sulfur (S) in beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest soils in relation to distance from the stem base as useful tool for modeling S biogeochemistry
title_sort fractionation of sulfur (s) in beech (fagus sylvatica) forest soils in relation to distance from the stem base as useful tool for modeling s biogeochemistry
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5570529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28848804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40808-017-0353-5
work_keys_str_mv AT hanousekondrej fractionationofsulfursinbeechfagussylvaticaforestsoilsinrelationtodistancefromthestembaseasusefultoolformodelingsbiogeochemistry
AT prohaskathomas fractionationofsulfursinbeechfagussylvaticaforestsoilsinrelationtodistancefromthestembaseasusefultoolformodelingsbiogeochemistry
AT kulhanekmartin fractionationofsulfursinbeechfagussylvaticaforestsoilsinrelationtodistancefromthestembaseasusefultoolformodelingsbiogeochemistry
AT balikjiri fractionationofsulfursinbeechfagussylvaticaforestsoilsinrelationtodistancefromthestembaseasusefultoolformodelingsbiogeochemistry
AT tejneckyvaclav fractionationofsulfursinbeechfagussylvaticaforestsoilsinrelationtodistancefromthestembaseasusefultoolformodelingsbiogeochemistry
AT bergertorstenw fractionationofsulfursinbeechfagussylvaticaforestsoilsinrelationtodistancefromthestembaseasusefultoolformodelingsbiogeochemistry