Forensic bitemark identification: weak foundations, exaggerated claims

Several forensic sciences, especially of the pattern-matching kind, are increasingly seen to lack the scientific foundation needed to justify continuing admission as trial evidence. Indeed, several have been abolished in the recent past. A likely next candidate for elimination is bitemark identifica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saks, Michael J., Albright, Thomas, Bohan, Thomas L., Bierer, Barbara E., Bowers, C. Michael, Bush, Mary A., Bush, Peter J., Casadevall, Arturo, Cole, Simon A., Denton, M. Bonner, Diamond, Shari Seidman, Dioso-Villa, Rachel, Epstein, Jules, Faigman, David, Faigman, Lisa, Fienberg, Stephen E., Garrett, Brandon L., Giannelli, Paul C., Greely, Henry T., Imwinkelried, Edward, Jamieson, Allan, Kafadar, Karen, Kassirer, Jerome P., Koehler, Jonathan ‘Jay’, Korn, David, Mnookin, Jennifer, Morrison, Alan B., Murphy, Erin, Peerwani, Nizam, Peterson, Joseph L., Risinger, D. Michael, Sensabaugh, George F., Spiegelman, Clifford, Stern, Hal, Thompson, William C., Wayman, James L., Zabell, Sandy, Zumwalt, Ross E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2016
Materias:
Original Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5570687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28852538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsw045

Ejemplares similares

Ejemplares similares