Cargando…

Drinking from the Data Well: Response to Gamete donor anonymity and limits on numbers of offspring: the views of three stakeholders

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Ertman, Martha M.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Oxford University Press 2016
Materias:	Peer Commentary
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5570704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28852544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsw042

Ejemplares similares

Gamete donor anonymity and limits on numbers of offspring: the views of three stakeholders
por: Nelson, Margaret K., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

As anonymity disappears the focus becomes limits on donor offspring
por: Nelson, Margaret K., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Universalizing anonymity anxiety
por: Cahill, Courtney Megan
Publicado: (2016)

Anonymity in third party reproduction: an old dilemma in new packaging?
por: Jacobson, Heather
Publicado: (2016)

Gamete donors' expectations and experiences of contact with their donor offspring
por: Kirkman, Maggie, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

The most plausible pro-coercion view: requiring informed agreement while penalizing non-participation in research
por: Barnhill, Anne
Publicado: (2015)

How best to protect the vital interests of donor-conceived individuals: prohibiting or mandating anonymity in gamete donations?()
por: de Melo-Martín, Inmaculada
Publicado: (2017)

Gamete donation: anti-anonymity does not equate to anti-donation
por: Groll, Daniel
Publicado: (2022)

Counselling on disclosure of gamete donation to donor offspring: a search for facts
por: Visser, M., et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Psychosocial aspects of identity-release gamete donation – perspectives of donors, recipients, and offspring
por: Skoog Svanberg, Agneta, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Domains of Well-Being in Minimally Conscious Patients: Illuminating a Persistent Problem
por: Graham, Mackenzie
Publicado: (2018)

Stakeholder Views on the Idea of Medicines Reuse in the UK
por: Donyai, Parastou, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Anti-anonymity should not be taken more seriously than other positions on gamete donation
por: Pennings, Guido
Publicado: (2023)

Science wars—How much risk should soldiers be exposed to in military experimentation?
por: Savulescu, Julian
Publicado: (2015)

Dehumanization: its operations and its origins
por: Simpson, Robert Mark
Publicado: (2015)

Orphan drug incentives in the pharmacogenomic context: policy responses in the USA and Canada
por: Herder, Matthew
Publicado: (2016)

Hate speech, volition, and neurology
por: Roginsky, Alexandra B., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Neuroscience cannot answer these questions: a response to G. and R. Murrow's essay hypothesizing a link between dehumanization, human rights abuses and public policy
por: Hoffman, Morris B.
Publicado: (2015)

Buttressing regulation of cognitive enhancement devices with principles of harm reduction
por: Fitz, Nicholas S., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Regulation of cognitive enhancement devices: commentary
por: Johnson, Reuben, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Medical regulation of cognitive enhancement devices: some concerns
por: King, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

The brain, cognitive enhancement devices, and European regulation
por: Kuersten, Andreas, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Outstanding questions concerning the regulation of cognitive enhancement devices
por: De Ridder, Dirk, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Environmental neuroethics: changing the environment—changing the brain Recommendations submitted to the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues
por: Illes, Judy, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Law and neuroscience: recommendations submitted to the President's Bioethics Commission
por: Jones, Owen D., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Letter
Publicado: (2014)

Ethical considerations of neuroscience research and the application of neuroscience research findings for the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues
Publicado: (2014)

Considering advances in neuroscience through the lenses of law and human rights
por: Frankel, Mark S.
Publicado: (2014)

Egg freezing, stratified reproduction and the logic of not
por: Ikemoto, Lisa C.
Publicado: (2015)

‘Good soldiers are made, not born’(⊥): the dangers of medicalizing ability in the military use of genetics
por: Roberts, Jessica L.
Publicado: (2015)

Yesterday's war; tomorrow's technology: peer commentary on ‘Ethical, legal, social and policy issues in the use of genomic technologies by the US military’
por: Evans, Nicholas G., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Military genomic testing: proportionality, expected benefits, and the connection between genotypes and phenotypes
por: Pence, Charles H.
Publicado: (2014)

Informed consent to participation in interventional studies: second-order in a different sense
por: Eyal, Nir
Publicado: (2015)

Two kinds of rule regulating human subjects research
por: Sachs, Benjamin
Publicado: (2015)

Are ethics promulgations self-defeating?
por: Gray, Derrick
Publicado: (2015)

Diversion effects, incentive effects, and the goals of research ethics promulgations
por: Wenner, Danielle M.
Publicado: (2015)

Commentary: Is there a problem Consent in Escrow can solve?
por: Taylor, Holly A.
Publicado: (2015)

Regulating drug promotion to promote the public health: a response to Bennett et al.
por: Zettler, Patricia J.
Publicado: (2015)

The problems of liminal states, line drawing, and false dichotomies
por: Suter, Sonia
Publicado: (2015)

The patent law Duchy of Grand Fenwick: a comment on The mouse that trolled: the long and tortuous history of a gene mutation patent that became an expensive impediment to Alzheimer's research
por: Sarnoff, Joshua D.
Publicado: (2015)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_f9c7hrnh5djt805uiee9sfqe9r