Cargando…

Redefining responsible research and innovation for the advancement of biobanking and biomedical research

One of the core objectives of responsible research and innovation (RRI) is to maximize the value of publicly funded research so that it may be returned to benefit society. However, while RRI encourages innovation through societal engagement, it can give rise to complex and previously untested issues...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Yu, Helen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5570717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28852540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsw047
_version_ 1783259211209113600
author Yu, Helen
author_facet Yu, Helen
author_sort Yu, Helen
collection PubMed
description One of the core objectives of responsible research and innovation (RRI) is to maximize the value of publicly funded research so that it may be returned to benefit society. However, while RRI encourages innovation through societal engagement, it can give rise to complex and previously untested issues that challenge the existing legal frameworks on intellectual property (IP) and public entitlement to benefits of research. In the case of biobanking, the personal nature of human biological materials and often altruistic intention of participants to donate samples intensifies the need to adhere to RRI principles with respect to the research, development, and commercialization of innovations derived from biobanks. However, stakeholders participate and collaborate with others in the innovation process to fulfill their own agenda. Without IP to safeguard investments in R&D, stakeholders may hesitate to contribute to the translation of discoveries into innovations. To realize the public benefit objective, RRI principles must protect the interests of stakeholders involved in the translation and commercialization of knowledge. This article explores the seemingly contradictory and competing objectives of open science and commercialization and proposes a holistic innovation framework directed at improving RRI practice for positive impact on obtaining the optimal social and economic values from research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5570717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55707172017-08-29 Redefining responsible research and innovation for the advancement of biobanking and biomedical research Yu, Helen J Law Biosci Original Article One of the core objectives of responsible research and innovation (RRI) is to maximize the value of publicly funded research so that it may be returned to benefit society. However, while RRI encourages innovation through societal engagement, it can give rise to complex and previously untested issues that challenge the existing legal frameworks on intellectual property (IP) and public entitlement to benefits of research. In the case of biobanking, the personal nature of human biological materials and often altruistic intention of participants to donate samples intensifies the need to adhere to RRI principles with respect to the research, development, and commercialization of innovations derived from biobanks. However, stakeholders participate and collaborate with others in the innovation process to fulfill their own agenda. Without IP to safeguard investments in R&D, stakeholders may hesitate to contribute to the translation of discoveries into innovations. To realize the public benefit objective, RRI principles must protect the interests of stakeholders involved in the translation and commercialization of knowledge. This article explores the seemingly contradictory and competing objectives of open science and commercialization and proposes a holistic innovation framework directed at improving RRI practice for positive impact on obtaining the optimal social and economic values from research. Oxford University Press 2016-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5570717/ /pubmed/28852540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsw047 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Duke University School of Law, Harvard Law School, Oxford University Press, and Stanford Law School. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Article
Yu, Helen
Redefining responsible research and innovation for the advancement of biobanking and biomedical research
title Redefining responsible research and innovation for the advancement of biobanking and biomedical research
title_full Redefining responsible research and innovation for the advancement of biobanking and biomedical research
title_fullStr Redefining responsible research and innovation for the advancement of biobanking and biomedical research
title_full_unstemmed Redefining responsible research and innovation for the advancement of biobanking and biomedical research
title_short Redefining responsible research and innovation for the advancement of biobanking and biomedical research
title_sort redefining responsible research and innovation for the advancement of biobanking and biomedical research
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5570717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28852540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsw047
work_keys_str_mv AT yuhelen redefiningresponsibleresearchandinnovationfortheadvancementofbiobankingandbiomedicalresearch