Cargando…

Universalizing anonymity anxiety

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Cahill, Courtney Megan
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Oxford University Press 2016
Materias:	Peer Commentary
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5570718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28852543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsw043

Ejemplares similares

As anonymity disappears the focus becomes limits on donor offspring
por: Nelson, Margaret K., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Anonymity in third party reproduction: an old dilemma in new packaging?
por: Jacobson, Heather
Publicado: (2016)

Drinking from the Data Well: Response to Gamete donor anonymity and limits on numbers of offspring: the views of three stakeholders
por: Ertman, Martha M.
Publicado: (2016)

Universities and Patent Demands
por: Cordova, Andrew K., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Orphan drug incentives in the pharmacogenomic context: policy responses in the USA and Canada
por: Herder, Matthew
Publicado: (2016)

Third-party reproductive practices: legislative inertia and the need for nuanced empirical data
por: Markens, Susan
Publicado: (2016)

Peer commentary: in vitro gametogenesis: just another way to have a baby
por: Carbone, June
Publicado: (2016)

Alice and ‘something more’: the drift towards European patent jurisprudence
por: Thambisetty, Siva
Publicado: (2016)

Uterus transplantation: does procreative liberty encompass a right to gestate?
por: Alghrani, Amel
Publicado: (2016)

Modernizing biomedical regulation: foresight and values in the promotion of responsible research and innovation
por: Harmon, Shawn H.E.
Publicado: (2016)

The off-label use, utility and potential value of tDCS in the clinical care of particular neuropsychiatric conditions
por: Bikson, Marom, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Precision medicine: a matter of regulation or collaboration?
por: Knoppers, Bartha Maria
Publicado: (2016)

Science wars—How much risk should soldiers be exposed to in military experimentation?
por: Savulescu, Julian
Publicado: (2015)

Dehumanization: its operations and its origins
por: Simpson, Robert Mark
Publicado: (2015)

Hate speech, volition, and neurology
por: Roginsky, Alexandra B., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Neuroscience cannot answer these questions: a response to G. and R. Murrow's essay hypothesizing a link between dehumanization, human rights abuses and public policy
por: Hoffman, Morris B.
Publicado: (2015)

Buttressing regulation of cognitive enhancement devices with principles of harm reduction
por: Fitz, Nicholas S., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Regulation of cognitive enhancement devices: commentary
por: Johnson, Reuben, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Medical regulation of cognitive enhancement devices: some concerns
por: King, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

The brain, cognitive enhancement devices, and European regulation
por: Kuersten, Andreas, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Outstanding questions concerning the regulation of cognitive enhancement devices
por: De Ridder, Dirk, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Environmental neuroethics: changing the environment—changing the brain Recommendations submitted to the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues
por: Illes, Judy, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Law and neuroscience: recommendations submitted to the President's Bioethics Commission
por: Jones, Owen D., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Letter
Publicado: (2014)

Ethical considerations of neuroscience research and the application of neuroscience research findings for the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues
Publicado: (2014)

Considering advances in neuroscience through the lenses of law and human rights
por: Frankel, Mark S.
Publicado: (2014)

Egg freezing, stratified reproduction and the logic of not
por: Ikemoto, Lisa C.
Publicado: (2015)

‘Good soldiers are made, not born’(⊥): the dangers of medicalizing ability in the military use of genetics
por: Roberts, Jessica L.
Publicado: (2015)

Yesterday's war; tomorrow's technology: peer commentary on ‘Ethical, legal, social and policy issues in the use of genomic technologies by the US military’
por: Evans, Nicholas G., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Military genomic testing: proportionality, expected benefits, and the connection between genotypes and phenotypes
por: Pence, Charles H.
Publicado: (2014)

The most plausible pro-coercion view: requiring informed agreement while penalizing non-participation in research
por: Barnhill, Anne
Publicado: (2015)

Informed consent to participation in interventional studies: second-order in a different sense
por: Eyal, Nir
Publicado: (2015)

Two kinds of rule regulating human subjects research
por: Sachs, Benjamin
Publicado: (2015)

Are ethics promulgations self-defeating?
por: Gray, Derrick
Publicado: (2015)

Diversion effects, incentive effects, and the goals of research ethics promulgations
por: Wenner, Danielle M.
Publicado: (2015)

Commentary: Is there a problem Consent in Escrow can solve?
por: Taylor, Holly A.
Publicado: (2015)

Regulating drug promotion to promote the public health: a response to Bennett et al.
por: Zettler, Patricia J.
Publicado: (2015)

The problems of liminal states, line drawing, and false dichotomies
por: Suter, Sonia
Publicado: (2015)

The patent law Duchy of Grand Fenwick: a comment on The mouse that trolled: the long and tortuous history of a gene mutation patent that became an expensive impediment to Alzheimer's research
por: Sarnoff, Joshua D.
Publicado: (2015)

Off-label drug promotion and the ephemeral line between marketing and education
por: Krause, Joan H.
Publicado: (2015)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_6alqitt7eim5rngc27c5g3673q