Cargando…

Combined photographic and ultrasonographic measurement of the ANB angle: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of noninvasive measurement of the ANB angle using photographic and ultrasonographic methods. METHODS: Twenty consecutive orthodontic patients were evaluated. The ANB angle and soft tissue thickness covering the N, A, and B cephalometric...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Di Blasio, Alberto, Di Blasio, Chiara, Pedrazzi, Giuseppe, Cassi, Diana, Magnifico, Marisabel, Manfredi, Edoardo, Gandolfini, Mauro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Singapore 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5570769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28890606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11282-017-0275-y
_version_ 1783259214095843328
author Di Blasio, Alberto
Di Blasio, Chiara
Pedrazzi, Giuseppe
Cassi, Diana
Magnifico, Marisabel
Manfredi, Edoardo
Gandolfini, Mauro
author_facet Di Blasio, Alberto
Di Blasio, Chiara
Pedrazzi, Giuseppe
Cassi, Diana
Magnifico, Marisabel
Manfredi, Edoardo
Gandolfini, Mauro
author_sort Di Blasio, Alberto
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of noninvasive measurement of the ANB angle using photographic and ultrasonographic methods. METHODS: Twenty consecutive orthodontic patients were evaluated. The ANB angle and soft tissue thickness covering the N, A, and B cephalometric points were measured by lateral teleradiography; these measurements were made by two expert operators. The soft tissue thickness covering the N, A, and B cephalometric points was measured by ultrasonography; these measurements were also made by two expert operators. On a 1:1 photographic profile print on which the ultrasonographic points were marked, the ANB ultrasonographic angle was measured. The following comparisons were considered: averaged and single measurements of N, A, and B points by first versus second ultrasonographer; averaged and single ultrasonographic versus radiographic soft tissue thickness covering the N, A, B points; and averaged and single ultrasonographic versus radiographic measurements of ANB angle. RESULTS: High correlation and concordance of the averaged and single measurements, but no significant difference, was found between the two ultrasonographers. No statistically significant difference was found between the two methods for measuring averaged soft tissue thickness, but a 20% difference was found for the single measurements. High correlation and concordance between the ultrasonographic and radiographic measurements, but no significant difference, was found between the single and averaged ANB angle measurements. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonography seems to be a noninvasive and reliable technique for measurement of the ANB angle and may replace radiographic measurement in some cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5570769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55707692017-09-07 Combined photographic and ultrasonographic measurement of the ANB angle: a pilot study Di Blasio, Alberto Di Blasio, Chiara Pedrazzi, Giuseppe Cassi, Diana Magnifico, Marisabel Manfredi, Edoardo Gandolfini, Mauro Oral Radiol Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of noninvasive measurement of the ANB angle using photographic and ultrasonographic methods. METHODS: Twenty consecutive orthodontic patients were evaluated. The ANB angle and soft tissue thickness covering the N, A, and B cephalometric points were measured by lateral teleradiography; these measurements were made by two expert operators. The soft tissue thickness covering the N, A, and B cephalometric points was measured by ultrasonography; these measurements were also made by two expert operators. On a 1:1 photographic profile print on which the ultrasonographic points were marked, the ANB ultrasonographic angle was measured. The following comparisons were considered: averaged and single measurements of N, A, and B points by first versus second ultrasonographer; averaged and single ultrasonographic versus radiographic soft tissue thickness covering the N, A, B points; and averaged and single ultrasonographic versus radiographic measurements of ANB angle. RESULTS: High correlation and concordance of the averaged and single measurements, but no significant difference, was found between the two ultrasonographers. No statistically significant difference was found between the two methods for measuring averaged soft tissue thickness, but a 20% difference was found for the single measurements. High correlation and concordance between the ultrasonographic and radiographic measurements, but no significant difference, was found between the single and averaged ANB angle measurements. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonography seems to be a noninvasive and reliable technique for measurement of the ANB angle and may replace radiographic measurement in some cases. Springer Singapore 2017-03-21 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5570769/ /pubmed/28890606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11282-017-0275-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Di Blasio, Alberto
Di Blasio, Chiara
Pedrazzi, Giuseppe
Cassi, Diana
Magnifico, Marisabel
Manfredi, Edoardo
Gandolfini, Mauro
Combined photographic and ultrasonographic measurement of the ANB angle: a pilot study
title Combined photographic and ultrasonographic measurement of the ANB angle: a pilot study
title_full Combined photographic and ultrasonographic measurement of the ANB angle: a pilot study
title_fullStr Combined photographic and ultrasonographic measurement of the ANB angle: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Combined photographic and ultrasonographic measurement of the ANB angle: a pilot study
title_short Combined photographic and ultrasonographic measurement of the ANB angle: a pilot study
title_sort combined photographic and ultrasonographic measurement of the anb angle: a pilot study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5570769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28890606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11282-017-0275-y
work_keys_str_mv AT diblasioalberto combinedphotographicandultrasonographicmeasurementoftheanbangleapilotstudy
AT diblasiochiara combinedphotographicandultrasonographicmeasurementoftheanbangleapilotstudy
AT pedrazzigiuseppe combinedphotographicandultrasonographicmeasurementoftheanbangleapilotstudy
AT cassidiana combinedphotographicandultrasonographicmeasurementoftheanbangleapilotstudy
AT magnificomarisabel combinedphotographicandultrasonographicmeasurementoftheanbangleapilotstudy
AT manfrediedoardo combinedphotographicandultrasonographicmeasurementoftheanbangleapilotstudy
AT gandolfinimauro combinedphotographicandultrasonographicmeasurementoftheanbangleapilotstudy