Cargando…

Analysis and evaluation of the entropy indices of a static network structure

Although degree distribution entropy (DDE), SD structure entropy (SDSE), Wu structure entropy (WSE) and FB structure entropy (FBSE) are four static network structure entropy indices widely used to quantify the heterogeneity of a complex network, previous studies have paid little attention to their d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cai, Meng, Cui, Ying, Stanley, H. Eugene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5570930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28839268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09475-9
_version_ 1783259250090311680
author Cai, Meng
Cui, Ying
Stanley, H. Eugene
author_facet Cai, Meng
Cui, Ying
Stanley, H. Eugene
author_sort Cai, Meng
collection PubMed
description Although degree distribution entropy (DDE), SD structure entropy (SDSE), Wu structure entropy (WSE) and FB structure entropy (FBSE) are four static network structure entropy indices widely used to quantify the heterogeneity of a complex network, previous studies have paid little attention to their differing abilities to describe network structure. We calculate these four structure entropies for four benchmark networks and compare the results by measuring the ability of each index to characterize network heterogeneity. We find that SDSE and FBSE more accurately characterize network heterogeneity than WSE and DDE. We also find that existing benchmark networks fail to distinguish SDSE and FBSE because they cannot discriminate local and global network heterogeneity. We solve this problem by proposing an evolving caveman network that reveals the differences between structure entropy indices by comparing the sensitivities during the network evolutionary process. Mathematical analysis and computational simulation both indicate that FBSE describes the global topology variation in the evolutionary process of a caveman network, and that the other three structure entropy indices reflect only local network heterogeneity. Our study offers an expansive view of the structural complexity of networks and expands our understanding of complex network behavior.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5570930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55709302017-09-01 Analysis and evaluation of the entropy indices of a static network structure Cai, Meng Cui, Ying Stanley, H. Eugene Sci Rep Article Although degree distribution entropy (DDE), SD structure entropy (SDSE), Wu structure entropy (WSE) and FB structure entropy (FBSE) are four static network structure entropy indices widely used to quantify the heterogeneity of a complex network, previous studies have paid little attention to their differing abilities to describe network structure. We calculate these four structure entropies for four benchmark networks and compare the results by measuring the ability of each index to characterize network heterogeneity. We find that SDSE and FBSE more accurately characterize network heterogeneity than WSE and DDE. We also find that existing benchmark networks fail to distinguish SDSE and FBSE because they cannot discriminate local and global network heterogeneity. We solve this problem by proposing an evolving caveman network that reveals the differences between structure entropy indices by comparing the sensitivities during the network evolutionary process. Mathematical analysis and computational simulation both indicate that FBSE describes the global topology variation in the evolutionary process of a caveman network, and that the other three structure entropy indices reflect only local network heterogeneity. Our study offers an expansive view of the structural complexity of networks and expands our understanding of complex network behavior. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5570930/ /pubmed/28839268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09475-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Cai, Meng
Cui, Ying
Stanley, H. Eugene
Analysis and evaluation of the entropy indices of a static network structure
title Analysis and evaluation of the entropy indices of a static network structure
title_full Analysis and evaluation of the entropy indices of a static network structure
title_fullStr Analysis and evaluation of the entropy indices of a static network structure
title_full_unstemmed Analysis and evaluation of the entropy indices of a static network structure
title_short Analysis and evaluation of the entropy indices of a static network structure
title_sort analysis and evaluation of the entropy indices of a static network structure
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5570930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28839268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09475-9
work_keys_str_mv AT caimeng analysisandevaluationoftheentropyindicesofastaticnetworkstructure
AT cuiying analysisandevaluationoftheentropyindicesofastaticnetworkstructure
AT stanleyheugene analysisandevaluationoftheentropyindicesofastaticnetworkstructure