Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability, Water Absorption, and Solubility of Three Temporary Restorative Materials: An in vitro Study

BACKGROUND: The quality of the coronal seal of root canal filling material is important for periapical health. Absorption of water or saliva by the temporary restorative materials leads to dimensional changes, loss of retention, staining and breaking in margin contours. Hence this study was carried...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prabhakar, AR, Shantha Rani, N, V Naik, Saraswathi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5571381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28890612
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1423
_version_ 1783259326729682944
author Prabhakar, AR
Shantha Rani, N
V Naik, Saraswathi
author_facet Prabhakar, AR
Shantha Rani, N
V Naik, Saraswathi
author_sort Prabhakar, AR
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The quality of the coronal seal of root canal filling material is important for periapical health. Absorption of water or saliva by the temporary restorative materials leads to dimensional changes, loss of retention, staining and breaking in margin contours. Hence this study was carried out to evaluate and compare the sealing properties, water absorption and solubility of IRM (intermediate restorative material), Cavit G and GC Caviton. STUDY DESIGN: Experimental, in vitro intergroup randomized control trial. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 36 non carious premolars were randomly selected assigned to three groups, 12 teeth in each. Standard endodontic access cavities of approximately 4x4mm wide were prepared followed by the root canal obturation with Gutta-percha and restoration with experimental materials. For microleakage testing dye penetration method was used with 2% methylene blue dye. Followed by evaluation and scoring under stereomicroscope at 40x magnification. Disc shaped 12 specimens for each group were prepared for each material, stored in desiccator at 37° C, weighed daily to verify mass stabilization (dry mass,m1). Thereafter, the specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 7days to obtain the mass after saturation with water (m2). The specimens were placed in the desiccators again, at 37° C, and reweighed until a constant dry mass is obtained (m3). Water absorption (WS) and solubility (SL) was determined by using the formulas, WS = m3 - m2/V and SL= ml - m3/ V. RESULTS: GC Caviton showed least microleakage and least water absorption followed by IRM and Cavit G, the differences were statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001) and there was no statistical difference found in all the groups with respect to solubility. CONCLUSIONS: GC Caviton is best and suitable temporary restorative material in endodontic interappointments followed by IRM and Cavit G HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Prabhakar AR, Rani NS, Naik SV. Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability, Water Absorption, and Solubility of Three Temporary Restorative Materials: An in vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2017;10(2):136-141.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5571381
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55713812017-09-08 Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability, Water Absorption, and Solubility of Three Temporary Restorative Materials: An in vitro Study Prabhakar, AR Shantha Rani, N V Naik, Saraswathi Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: The quality of the coronal seal of root canal filling material is important for periapical health. Absorption of water or saliva by the temporary restorative materials leads to dimensional changes, loss of retention, staining and breaking in margin contours. Hence this study was carried out to evaluate and compare the sealing properties, water absorption and solubility of IRM (intermediate restorative material), Cavit G and GC Caviton. STUDY DESIGN: Experimental, in vitro intergroup randomized control trial. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 36 non carious premolars were randomly selected assigned to three groups, 12 teeth in each. Standard endodontic access cavities of approximately 4x4mm wide were prepared followed by the root canal obturation with Gutta-percha and restoration with experimental materials. For microleakage testing dye penetration method was used with 2% methylene blue dye. Followed by evaluation and scoring under stereomicroscope at 40x magnification. Disc shaped 12 specimens for each group were prepared for each material, stored in desiccator at 37° C, weighed daily to verify mass stabilization (dry mass,m1). Thereafter, the specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 7days to obtain the mass after saturation with water (m2). The specimens were placed in the desiccators again, at 37° C, and reweighed until a constant dry mass is obtained (m3). Water absorption (WS) and solubility (SL) was determined by using the formulas, WS = m3 - m2/V and SL= ml - m3/ V. RESULTS: GC Caviton showed least microleakage and least water absorption followed by IRM and Cavit G, the differences were statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001) and there was no statistical difference found in all the groups with respect to solubility. CONCLUSIONS: GC Caviton is best and suitable temporary restorative material in endodontic interappointments followed by IRM and Cavit G HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Prabhakar AR, Rani NS, Naik SV. Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability, Water Absorption, and Solubility of Three Temporary Restorative Materials: An in vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2017;10(2):136-141. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2017 2017-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5571381/ /pubmed/28890612 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1423 Text en Copyright © 2017; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Prabhakar, AR
Shantha Rani, N
V Naik, Saraswathi
Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability, Water Absorption, and Solubility of Three Temporary Restorative Materials: An in vitro Study
title Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability, Water Absorption, and Solubility of Three Temporary Restorative Materials: An in vitro Study
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability, Water Absorption, and Solubility of Three Temporary Restorative Materials: An in vitro Study
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability, Water Absorption, and Solubility of Three Temporary Restorative Materials: An in vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability, Water Absorption, and Solubility of Three Temporary Restorative Materials: An in vitro Study
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability, Water Absorption, and Solubility of Three Temporary Restorative Materials: An in vitro Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of sealing ability, water absorption, and solubility of three temporary restorative materials: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5571381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28890612
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1423
work_keys_str_mv AT prabhakarar comparativeevaluationofsealingabilitywaterabsorptionandsolubilityofthreetemporaryrestorativematerialsaninvitrostudy
AT shantharanin comparativeevaluationofsealingabilitywaterabsorptionandsolubilityofthreetemporaryrestorativematerialsaninvitrostudy
AT vnaiksaraswathi comparativeevaluationofsealingabilitywaterabsorptionandsolubilityofthreetemporaryrestorativematerialsaninvitrostudy