Cargando…

Antioxidant capacity and fatty acids characterization of heat treated cow and buffalo milk

BACKGROUND: Antioxidant capacity of milk is largely due to vitamins A, E, carotenoids, zinc, selenium, superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione peroxidase and enzyme systems. Cow milk has antioxidant capacity while the antioxidant capacity of buffalo milk has been studied in a limited way. The in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khan, Imran Taj, Nadeem, Muhammad, Imran, Muhammad, Ayaz, Muhammad, Ajmal, Muhammad, Ellahi, Muhammad Yaqoob, Khalique, Anjum
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5571557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28836975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12944-017-0553-z
_version_ 1783259365308891136
author Khan, Imran Taj
Nadeem, Muhammad
Imran, Muhammad
Ayaz, Muhammad
Ajmal, Muhammad
Ellahi, Muhammad Yaqoob
Khalique, Anjum
author_facet Khan, Imran Taj
Nadeem, Muhammad
Imran, Muhammad
Ayaz, Muhammad
Ajmal, Muhammad
Ellahi, Muhammad Yaqoob
Khalique, Anjum
author_sort Khan, Imran Taj
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Antioxidant capacity of milk is largely due to vitamins A, E, carotenoids, zinc, selenium, superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione peroxidase and enzyme systems. Cow milk has antioxidant capacity while the antioxidant capacity of buffalo milk has been studied in a limited way. The information regarding the effect of pasteurization and boiling on antioxidant capacity of cow and buffalo milk is also scared. METHODS: Cow and buffalo milk was exposed to two different heat treatments i.e. 65 °C for 30 min and boiling for 1 min. After heat treatments, milk samples were cooled down to 4 °C packaged in transparent 250 ml polyethylene PET bottles and stored at 4 °C for 6 days. Milk composition, total flavonoid content, total antioxidant capacity, reducing power, DPPH free radical scavenging activity, antioxidant activity in linoleic acid, vitamin C, A, E, selenium, Zinc, fatty acid profile, peroxide value and sensory characteristics were studied in raw, pasteurized and boiled cow and buffalo milk at 0, 3 and 6 days of storage period. RESULTS: Total antioxidant capacity (TAC) of raw, pasteurized and boiled milk for cow (42.1, 41.3 and 40.7%) and buffalo (58.4, 57.6 and 56.5%) samples was found, respectively. Reducing power (RP) of raw cow and buffalo milk was 6.74 and 13.7 while pasteurization and boiling did not showed significant effect on RP of both cow and buffalo milk. DPPH activity of raw, pasteurized and boiled milk for cow (24.3, 23.8 and 23.6%) and buffalo (31.8, 31.5 and 30.4%) samples was noted, respectively. Storage period up to 3 days was non-significant while DPPH assay after 6 days of storage period indicated significant decline in antioxidant activity of milk samples. Antioxidant activity in linoleic acid (AALA) of buffalo and cow milk were recorded 11.7 and 17.4%, respectively. Pasteurization and boiling did not showed any impact on antioxidant capacity of cow and buffalo milk. The Loss of vitamin C in pasteurization (40 and 42%) and boiling (82 and 61%) of cow and buffalo milk was recorded, respectively. Concentration of vitamin A and E in pasteurized cow and buffalo milk was not significantly different from raw milk samples of cow and buffalo. Concentration of selenium and zinc was not influenced by the heat treatment in both cow and buffalo milk samples. After 3 days of refrigerated storage, antioxidant capacity of both cow and buffalo milk decreased. Concentrations of short-chain and medium-chain fatty acids increased in pasteurized and boiled cow and buffalo milk, while long-chain fatty acids decreased in pasteurized and boiled cow and buffalo milk, with no effect on colour and flavor score. Peroxide value of pasteurized and boiled cow and buffalo milk was not influenced by the storage up to 3 days. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that buffalo milk had a higher antioxidant capacity than cow milk and pasteurized milk should be consumed within 3 days of refrigerated storage for better antioxidant perspectives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5571557
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55715572017-08-30 Antioxidant capacity and fatty acids characterization of heat treated cow and buffalo milk Khan, Imran Taj Nadeem, Muhammad Imran, Muhammad Ayaz, Muhammad Ajmal, Muhammad Ellahi, Muhammad Yaqoob Khalique, Anjum Lipids Health Dis Research BACKGROUND: Antioxidant capacity of milk is largely due to vitamins A, E, carotenoids, zinc, selenium, superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione peroxidase and enzyme systems. Cow milk has antioxidant capacity while the antioxidant capacity of buffalo milk has been studied in a limited way. The information regarding the effect of pasteurization and boiling on antioxidant capacity of cow and buffalo milk is also scared. METHODS: Cow and buffalo milk was exposed to two different heat treatments i.e. 65 °C for 30 min and boiling for 1 min. After heat treatments, milk samples were cooled down to 4 °C packaged in transparent 250 ml polyethylene PET bottles and stored at 4 °C for 6 days. Milk composition, total flavonoid content, total antioxidant capacity, reducing power, DPPH free radical scavenging activity, antioxidant activity in linoleic acid, vitamin C, A, E, selenium, Zinc, fatty acid profile, peroxide value and sensory characteristics were studied in raw, pasteurized and boiled cow and buffalo milk at 0, 3 and 6 days of storage period. RESULTS: Total antioxidant capacity (TAC) of raw, pasteurized and boiled milk for cow (42.1, 41.3 and 40.7%) and buffalo (58.4, 57.6 and 56.5%) samples was found, respectively. Reducing power (RP) of raw cow and buffalo milk was 6.74 and 13.7 while pasteurization and boiling did not showed significant effect on RP of both cow and buffalo milk. DPPH activity of raw, pasteurized and boiled milk for cow (24.3, 23.8 and 23.6%) and buffalo (31.8, 31.5 and 30.4%) samples was noted, respectively. Storage period up to 3 days was non-significant while DPPH assay after 6 days of storage period indicated significant decline in antioxidant activity of milk samples. Antioxidant activity in linoleic acid (AALA) of buffalo and cow milk were recorded 11.7 and 17.4%, respectively. Pasteurization and boiling did not showed any impact on antioxidant capacity of cow and buffalo milk. The Loss of vitamin C in pasteurization (40 and 42%) and boiling (82 and 61%) of cow and buffalo milk was recorded, respectively. Concentration of vitamin A and E in pasteurized cow and buffalo milk was not significantly different from raw milk samples of cow and buffalo. Concentration of selenium and zinc was not influenced by the heat treatment in both cow and buffalo milk samples. After 3 days of refrigerated storage, antioxidant capacity of both cow and buffalo milk decreased. Concentrations of short-chain and medium-chain fatty acids increased in pasteurized and boiled cow and buffalo milk, while long-chain fatty acids decreased in pasteurized and boiled cow and buffalo milk, with no effect on colour and flavor score. Peroxide value of pasteurized and boiled cow and buffalo milk was not influenced by the storage up to 3 days. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that buffalo milk had a higher antioxidant capacity than cow milk and pasteurized milk should be consumed within 3 days of refrigerated storage for better antioxidant perspectives. BioMed Central 2017-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5571557/ /pubmed/28836975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12944-017-0553-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Khan, Imran Taj
Nadeem, Muhammad
Imran, Muhammad
Ayaz, Muhammad
Ajmal, Muhammad
Ellahi, Muhammad Yaqoob
Khalique, Anjum
Antioxidant capacity and fatty acids characterization of heat treated cow and buffalo milk
title Antioxidant capacity and fatty acids characterization of heat treated cow and buffalo milk
title_full Antioxidant capacity and fatty acids characterization of heat treated cow and buffalo milk
title_fullStr Antioxidant capacity and fatty acids characterization of heat treated cow and buffalo milk
title_full_unstemmed Antioxidant capacity and fatty acids characterization of heat treated cow and buffalo milk
title_short Antioxidant capacity and fatty acids characterization of heat treated cow and buffalo milk
title_sort antioxidant capacity and fatty acids characterization of heat treated cow and buffalo milk
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5571557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28836975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12944-017-0553-z
work_keys_str_mv AT khanimrantaj antioxidantcapacityandfattyacidscharacterizationofheattreatedcowandbuffalomilk
AT nadeemmuhammad antioxidantcapacityandfattyacidscharacterizationofheattreatedcowandbuffalomilk
AT imranmuhammad antioxidantcapacityandfattyacidscharacterizationofheattreatedcowandbuffalomilk
AT ayazmuhammad antioxidantcapacityandfattyacidscharacterizationofheattreatedcowandbuffalomilk
AT ajmalmuhammad antioxidantcapacityandfattyacidscharacterizationofheattreatedcowandbuffalomilk
AT ellahimuhammadyaqoob antioxidantcapacityandfattyacidscharacterizationofheattreatedcowandbuffalomilk
AT khaliqueanjum antioxidantcapacityandfattyacidscharacterizationofheattreatedcowandbuffalomilk