Cargando…
Is there an alternative treatment for patients intolerant to antiplatelet therapy if percutaneous left atrial appendage closure is considered?
INTRODUCTION: Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure has become of major interest for patients with atrial fibrillation intolerant to oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC). Patients with a contraindication to both OAC and antiplatelet therapy are not eligible for percutaneous LAA closure. We aimed to find...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5571603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28429136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-017-0987-y |
_version_ | 1783259375943548928 |
---|---|
author | Akca, F. Verberkmoes, N. J. Verstraeten, S. E. van Laar, C. van Putte, B. P. van Straten, A. H. M. |
author_facet | Akca, F. Verberkmoes, N. J. Verstraeten, S. E. van Laar, C. van Putte, B. P. van Straten, A. H. M. |
author_sort | Akca, F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure has become of major interest for patients with atrial fibrillation intolerant to oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC). Patients with a contraindication to both OAC and antiplatelet therapy are not eligible for percutaneous LAA closure. We aimed to find an alternative treatment for these specific patients. METHODS: From March 2014 until December 2015 five patients were referred for percutaneous LAA closure. Alternative treatment was necessary due to an absolute contraindication to OAC and antiplatelet therapy (n = 4) or after previous failed percutaneous device implantation (n = 1). A stand-alone full thoracoscopic closure of the LAA using the Atriclip PRO device (AtriCure Inc., Dayton, OH, USA) was performed under guidance of transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE). After three months all patients underwent a computed tomography scan. Mean follow-up was 7.2 months [range 4.5–9.8 months]. RESULTS: All procedures were achieved without the occurrence of complications. Complete LAA closure was obtained in all patients without any residual flow confirmed by TEE. Postoperative computed tomography confirmed persisting adequate clip positioning with complete LAA closure and absence of intracardial thrombi. During follow-up no thromboembolic events occurred. CONCLUSION: For atrial fibrillation patients with an absolute contraindication to OAC and antiplatelet therapy a stand-alone, minimally invasive thoracoscopic closure of the LAA is a safe and feasible alternative treatment. This might be a solution to avoid serious bleeding complications while eliminating the thromboembolic risk originating from the LAA in patients who are not eligible for percutaneous LAA closure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5571603 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Bohn Stafleu van Loghum |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55716032017-09-11 Is there an alternative treatment for patients intolerant to antiplatelet therapy if percutaneous left atrial appendage closure is considered? Akca, F. Verberkmoes, N. J. Verstraeten, S. E. van Laar, C. van Putte, B. P. van Straten, A. H. M. Neth Heart J Original Article - Design Study Article INTRODUCTION: Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure has become of major interest for patients with atrial fibrillation intolerant to oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC). Patients with a contraindication to both OAC and antiplatelet therapy are not eligible for percutaneous LAA closure. We aimed to find an alternative treatment for these specific patients. METHODS: From March 2014 until December 2015 five patients were referred for percutaneous LAA closure. Alternative treatment was necessary due to an absolute contraindication to OAC and antiplatelet therapy (n = 4) or after previous failed percutaneous device implantation (n = 1). A stand-alone full thoracoscopic closure of the LAA using the Atriclip PRO device (AtriCure Inc., Dayton, OH, USA) was performed under guidance of transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE). After three months all patients underwent a computed tomography scan. Mean follow-up was 7.2 months [range 4.5–9.8 months]. RESULTS: All procedures were achieved without the occurrence of complications. Complete LAA closure was obtained in all patients without any residual flow confirmed by TEE. Postoperative computed tomography confirmed persisting adequate clip positioning with complete LAA closure and absence of intracardial thrombi. During follow-up no thromboembolic events occurred. CONCLUSION: For atrial fibrillation patients with an absolute contraindication to OAC and antiplatelet therapy a stand-alone, minimally invasive thoracoscopic closure of the LAA is a safe and feasible alternative treatment. This might be a solution to avoid serious bleeding complications while eliminating the thromboembolic risk originating from the LAA in patients who are not eligible for percutaneous LAA closure. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2017-04-20 2017-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5571603/ /pubmed/28429136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-017-0987-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article - Design Study Article Akca, F. Verberkmoes, N. J. Verstraeten, S. E. van Laar, C. van Putte, B. P. van Straten, A. H. M. Is there an alternative treatment for patients intolerant to antiplatelet therapy if percutaneous left atrial appendage closure is considered? |
title | Is there an alternative treatment for patients intolerant to antiplatelet therapy if percutaneous left atrial appendage closure is considered? |
title_full | Is there an alternative treatment for patients intolerant to antiplatelet therapy if percutaneous left atrial appendage closure is considered? |
title_fullStr | Is there an alternative treatment for patients intolerant to antiplatelet therapy if percutaneous left atrial appendage closure is considered? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is there an alternative treatment for patients intolerant to antiplatelet therapy if percutaneous left atrial appendage closure is considered? |
title_short | Is there an alternative treatment for patients intolerant to antiplatelet therapy if percutaneous left atrial appendage closure is considered? |
title_sort | is there an alternative treatment for patients intolerant to antiplatelet therapy if percutaneous left atrial appendage closure is considered? |
topic | Original Article - Design Study Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5571603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28429136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-017-0987-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT akcaf isthereanalternativetreatmentforpatientsintoleranttoantiplatelettherapyifpercutaneousleftatrialappendageclosureisconsidered AT verberkmoesnj isthereanalternativetreatmentforpatientsintoleranttoantiplatelettherapyifpercutaneousleftatrialappendageclosureisconsidered AT verstraetense isthereanalternativetreatmentforpatientsintoleranttoantiplatelettherapyifpercutaneousleftatrialappendageclosureisconsidered AT vanlaarc isthereanalternativetreatmentforpatientsintoleranttoantiplatelettherapyifpercutaneousleftatrialappendageclosureisconsidered AT vanputtebp isthereanalternativetreatmentforpatientsintoleranttoantiplatelettherapyifpercutaneousleftatrialappendageclosureisconsidered AT vanstratenahm isthereanalternativetreatmentforpatientsintoleranttoantiplatelettherapyifpercutaneousleftatrialappendageclosureisconsidered |