Cargando…

Is there an alternative treatment for patients intolerant to antiplatelet therapy if percutaneous left atrial appendage closure is considered?

INTRODUCTION: Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure has become of major interest for patients with atrial fibrillation intolerant to oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC). Patients with a contraindication to both OAC and antiplatelet therapy are not eligible for percutaneous LAA closure. We aimed to find...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akca, F., Verberkmoes, N. J., Verstraeten, S. E., van Laar, C., van Putte, B. P., van Straten, A. H. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5571603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28429136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-017-0987-y
_version_ 1783259375943548928
author Akca, F.
Verberkmoes, N. J.
Verstraeten, S. E.
van Laar, C.
van Putte, B. P.
van Straten, A. H. M.
author_facet Akca, F.
Verberkmoes, N. J.
Verstraeten, S. E.
van Laar, C.
van Putte, B. P.
van Straten, A. H. M.
author_sort Akca, F.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure has become of major interest for patients with atrial fibrillation intolerant to oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC). Patients with a contraindication to both OAC and antiplatelet therapy are not eligible for percutaneous LAA closure. We aimed to find an alternative treatment for these specific patients. METHODS: From March 2014 until December 2015 five patients were referred for percutaneous LAA closure. Alternative treatment was necessary due to an absolute contraindication to OAC and antiplatelet therapy (n = 4) or after previous failed percutaneous device implantation (n = 1). A stand-alone full thoracoscopic closure of the LAA using the Atriclip PRO device (AtriCure Inc., Dayton, OH, USA) was performed under guidance of transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE). After three months all patients underwent a computed tomography scan. Mean follow-up was 7.2 months [range 4.5–9.8 months]. RESULTS: All procedures were achieved without the occurrence of complications. Complete LAA closure was obtained in all patients without any residual flow confirmed by TEE. Postoperative computed tomography confirmed persisting adequate clip positioning with complete LAA closure and absence of intracardial thrombi. During follow-up no thromboembolic events occurred. CONCLUSION: For atrial fibrillation patients with an absolute contraindication to OAC and antiplatelet therapy a stand-alone, minimally invasive thoracoscopic closure of the LAA is a safe and feasible alternative treatment. This might be a solution to avoid serious bleeding complications while eliminating the thromboembolic risk originating from the LAA in patients who are not eligible for percutaneous LAA closure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5571603
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55716032017-09-11 Is there an alternative treatment for patients intolerant to antiplatelet therapy if percutaneous left atrial appendage closure is considered? Akca, F. Verberkmoes, N. J. Verstraeten, S. E. van Laar, C. van Putte, B. P. van Straten, A. H. M. Neth Heart J Original Article - Design Study Article INTRODUCTION: Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure has become of major interest for patients with atrial fibrillation intolerant to oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC). Patients with a contraindication to both OAC and antiplatelet therapy are not eligible for percutaneous LAA closure. We aimed to find an alternative treatment for these specific patients. METHODS: From March 2014 until December 2015 five patients were referred for percutaneous LAA closure. Alternative treatment was necessary due to an absolute contraindication to OAC and antiplatelet therapy (n = 4) or after previous failed percutaneous device implantation (n = 1). A stand-alone full thoracoscopic closure of the LAA using the Atriclip PRO device (AtriCure Inc., Dayton, OH, USA) was performed under guidance of transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE). After three months all patients underwent a computed tomography scan. Mean follow-up was 7.2 months [range 4.5–9.8 months]. RESULTS: All procedures were achieved without the occurrence of complications. Complete LAA closure was obtained in all patients without any residual flow confirmed by TEE. Postoperative computed tomography confirmed persisting adequate clip positioning with complete LAA closure and absence of intracardial thrombi. During follow-up no thromboembolic events occurred. CONCLUSION: For atrial fibrillation patients with an absolute contraindication to OAC and antiplatelet therapy a stand-alone, minimally invasive thoracoscopic closure of the LAA is a safe and feasible alternative treatment. This might be a solution to avoid serious bleeding complications while eliminating the thromboembolic risk originating from the LAA in patients who are not eligible for percutaneous LAA closure. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2017-04-20 2017-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5571603/ /pubmed/28429136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-017-0987-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article - Design Study Article
Akca, F.
Verberkmoes, N. J.
Verstraeten, S. E.
van Laar, C.
van Putte, B. P.
van Straten, A. H. M.
Is there an alternative treatment for patients intolerant to antiplatelet therapy if percutaneous left atrial appendage closure is considered?
title Is there an alternative treatment for patients intolerant to antiplatelet therapy if percutaneous left atrial appendage closure is considered?
title_full Is there an alternative treatment for patients intolerant to antiplatelet therapy if percutaneous left atrial appendage closure is considered?
title_fullStr Is there an alternative treatment for patients intolerant to antiplatelet therapy if percutaneous left atrial appendage closure is considered?
title_full_unstemmed Is there an alternative treatment for patients intolerant to antiplatelet therapy if percutaneous left atrial appendage closure is considered?
title_short Is there an alternative treatment for patients intolerant to antiplatelet therapy if percutaneous left atrial appendage closure is considered?
title_sort is there an alternative treatment for patients intolerant to antiplatelet therapy if percutaneous left atrial appendage closure is considered?
topic Original Article - Design Study Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5571603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28429136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-017-0987-y
work_keys_str_mv AT akcaf isthereanalternativetreatmentforpatientsintoleranttoantiplatelettherapyifpercutaneousleftatrialappendageclosureisconsidered
AT verberkmoesnj isthereanalternativetreatmentforpatientsintoleranttoantiplatelettherapyifpercutaneousleftatrialappendageclosureisconsidered
AT verstraetense isthereanalternativetreatmentforpatientsintoleranttoantiplatelettherapyifpercutaneousleftatrialappendageclosureisconsidered
AT vanlaarc isthereanalternativetreatmentforpatientsintoleranttoantiplatelettherapyifpercutaneousleftatrialappendageclosureisconsidered
AT vanputtebp isthereanalternativetreatmentforpatientsintoleranttoantiplatelettherapyifpercutaneousleftatrialappendageclosureisconsidered
AT vanstratenahm isthereanalternativetreatmentforpatientsintoleranttoantiplatelettherapyifpercutaneousleftatrialappendageclosureisconsidered