Cargando…

Evaluation of a peer-delivered, transitional and post-discharge support program following psychiatric hospitalisation

BACKGROUND: The time following discharge from psychiatric hospitalisation is a high risk period. Rates of hospital readmission are high and there is increased risk for homelessness and suicide. Transitional and post-discharge support programs have demonstrated positive results in terms of enhanced w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scanlan, Justin Newton, Hancock, Nicola, Honey, Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5571619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28836964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1469-x
_version_ 1783259379831668736
author Scanlan, Justin Newton
Hancock, Nicola
Honey, Anne
author_facet Scanlan, Justin Newton
Hancock, Nicola
Honey, Anne
author_sort Scanlan, Justin Newton
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The time following discharge from psychiatric hospitalisation is a high risk period. Rates of hospital readmission are high and there is increased risk for homelessness and suicide. Transitional and post-discharge support programs have demonstrated positive results in terms of enhanced wellbeing, improved connection with community-based services and, in some cases, reductions in hospital re-admission. This paper reports on the outcomes of a peer-delivered post-discharge support program. METHODS: The program involved peer workers (individuals with their own lived experience of mental illness and recovery) providing individualised practical and emotional support to individuals for six to eight weeks following discharge from an inpatient psychiatric unit. Outcomes measures included self-reported mental health recovery, personal wellness and self-reported re-admission rates. Process and satisfaction measures were also collected and semi-structured follow-up interviews were completed with consenting participants. RESULTS: The program provided support for a total of 64 individuals, 38 of whom consented to participate in the evaluation. Participants reported improvements in terms of functional and clinical recovery and in the areas of intellectual, social and psychological wellness. Participants self-report of hospital readmissions suggested that there was a reduction in hospital bed days following engagement with the program. Themes from the follow up interviews included: Easing the transition to the “real world”; Practical and individualised support; Someone to talk to; Positive qualities of the worker, Workers’ lived experience was a positive thing, and It wasn’t long enough. CONCLUSION: Overall, evaluation data suggest that the program supported positive outcomes for participants in terms of recovery, wellbeing and hospital avoidance. Participant feedback suggested that the use of support workers with their own lived experience of mental illness was a particularly powerful aspect of the program.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5571619
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55716192017-08-30 Evaluation of a peer-delivered, transitional and post-discharge support program following psychiatric hospitalisation Scanlan, Justin Newton Hancock, Nicola Honey, Anne BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: The time following discharge from psychiatric hospitalisation is a high risk period. Rates of hospital readmission are high and there is increased risk for homelessness and suicide. Transitional and post-discharge support programs have demonstrated positive results in terms of enhanced wellbeing, improved connection with community-based services and, in some cases, reductions in hospital re-admission. This paper reports on the outcomes of a peer-delivered post-discharge support program. METHODS: The program involved peer workers (individuals with their own lived experience of mental illness and recovery) providing individualised practical and emotional support to individuals for six to eight weeks following discharge from an inpatient psychiatric unit. Outcomes measures included self-reported mental health recovery, personal wellness and self-reported re-admission rates. Process and satisfaction measures were also collected and semi-structured follow-up interviews were completed with consenting participants. RESULTS: The program provided support for a total of 64 individuals, 38 of whom consented to participate in the evaluation. Participants reported improvements in terms of functional and clinical recovery and in the areas of intellectual, social and psychological wellness. Participants self-report of hospital readmissions suggested that there was a reduction in hospital bed days following engagement with the program. Themes from the follow up interviews included: Easing the transition to the “real world”; Practical and individualised support; Someone to talk to; Positive qualities of the worker, Workers’ lived experience was a positive thing, and It wasn’t long enough. CONCLUSION: Overall, evaluation data suggest that the program supported positive outcomes for participants in terms of recovery, wellbeing and hospital avoidance. Participant feedback suggested that the use of support workers with their own lived experience of mental illness was a particularly powerful aspect of the program. BioMed Central 2017-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5571619/ /pubmed/28836964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1469-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Scanlan, Justin Newton
Hancock, Nicola
Honey, Anne
Evaluation of a peer-delivered, transitional and post-discharge support program following psychiatric hospitalisation
title Evaluation of a peer-delivered, transitional and post-discharge support program following psychiatric hospitalisation
title_full Evaluation of a peer-delivered, transitional and post-discharge support program following psychiatric hospitalisation
title_fullStr Evaluation of a peer-delivered, transitional and post-discharge support program following psychiatric hospitalisation
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a peer-delivered, transitional and post-discharge support program following psychiatric hospitalisation
title_short Evaluation of a peer-delivered, transitional and post-discharge support program following psychiatric hospitalisation
title_sort evaluation of a peer-delivered, transitional and post-discharge support program following psychiatric hospitalisation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5571619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28836964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1469-x
work_keys_str_mv AT scanlanjustinnewton evaluationofapeerdeliveredtransitionalandpostdischargesupportprogramfollowingpsychiatrichospitalisation
AT hancocknicola evaluationofapeerdeliveredtransitionalandpostdischargesupportprogramfollowingpsychiatrichospitalisation
AT honeyanne evaluationofapeerdeliveredtransitionalandpostdischargesupportprogramfollowingpsychiatrichospitalisation