Cargando…
Evaluation of a peer-delivered, transitional and post-discharge support program following psychiatric hospitalisation
BACKGROUND: The time following discharge from psychiatric hospitalisation is a high risk period. Rates of hospital readmission are high and there is increased risk for homelessness and suicide. Transitional and post-discharge support programs have demonstrated positive results in terms of enhanced w...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5571619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28836964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1469-x |
_version_ | 1783259379831668736 |
---|---|
author | Scanlan, Justin Newton Hancock, Nicola Honey, Anne |
author_facet | Scanlan, Justin Newton Hancock, Nicola Honey, Anne |
author_sort | Scanlan, Justin Newton |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The time following discharge from psychiatric hospitalisation is a high risk period. Rates of hospital readmission are high and there is increased risk for homelessness and suicide. Transitional and post-discharge support programs have demonstrated positive results in terms of enhanced wellbeing, improved connection with community-based services and, in some cases, reductions in hospital re-admission. This paper reports on the outcomes of a peer-delivered post-discharge support program. METHODS: The program involved peer workers (individuals with their own lived experience of mental illness and recovery) providing individualised practical and emotional support to individuals for six to eight weeks following discharge from an inpatient psychiatric unit. Outcomes measures included self-reported mental health recovery, personal wellness and self-reported re-admission rates. Process and satisfaction measures were also collected and semi-structured follow-up interviews were completed with consenting participants. RESULTS: The program provided support for a total of 64 individuals, 38 of whom consented to participate in the evaluation. Participants reported improvements in terms of functional and clinical recovery and in the areas of intellectual, social and psychological wellness. Participants self-report of hospital readmissions suggested that there was a reduction in hospital bed days following engagement with the program. Themes from the follow up interviews included: Easing the transition to the “real world”; Practical and individualised support; Someone to talk to; Positive qualities of the worker, Workers’ lived experience was a positive thing, and It wasn’t long enough. CONCLUSION: Overall, evaluation data suggest that the program supported positive outcomes for participants in terms of recovery, wellbeing and hospital avoidance. Participant feedback suggested that the use of support workers with their own lived experience of mental illness was a particularly powerful aspect of the program. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5571619 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55716192017-08-30 Evaluation of a peer-delivered, transitional and post-discharge support program following psychiatric hospitalisation Scanlan, Justin Newton Hancock, Nicola Honey, Anne BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: The time following discharge from psychiatric hospitalisation is a high risk period. Rates of hospital readmission are high and there is increased risk for homelessness and suicide. Transitional and post-discharge support programs have demonstrated positive results in terms of enhanced wellbeing, improved connection with community-based services and, in some cases, reductions in hospital re-admission. This paper reports on the outcomes of a peer-delivered post-discharge support program. METHODS: The program involved peer workers (individuals with their own lived experience of mental illness and recovery) providing individualised practical and emotional support to individuals for six to eight weeks following discharge from an inpatient psychiatric unit. Outcomes measures included self-reported mental health recovery, personal wellness and self-reported re-admission rates. Process and satisfaction measures were also collected and semi-structured follow-up interviews were completed with consenting participants. RESULTS: The program provided support for a total of 64 individuals, 38 of whom consented to participate in the evaluation. Participants reported improvements in terms of functional and clinical recovery and in the areas of intellectual, social and psychological wellness. Participants self-report of hospital readmissions suggested that there was a reduction in hospital bed days following engagement with the program. Themes from the follow up interviews included: Easing the transition to the “real world”; Practical and individualised support; Someone to talk to; Positive qualities of the worker, Workers’ lived experience was a positive thing, and It wasn’t long enough. CONCLUSION: Overall, evaluation data suggest that the program supported positive outcomes for participants in terms of recovery, wellbeing and hospital avoidance. Participant feedback suggested that the use of support workers with their own lived experience of mental illness was a particularly powerful aspect of the program. BioMed Central 2017-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5571619/ /pubmed/28836964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1469-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Scanlan, Justin Newton Hancock, Nicola Honey, Anne Evaluation of a peer-delivered, transitional and post-discharge support program following psychiatric hospitalisation |
title | Evaluation of a peer-delivered, transitional and post-discharge support program following psychiatric hospitalisation |
title_full | Evaluation of a peer-delivered, transitional and post-discharge support program following psychiatric hospitalisation |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a peer-delivered, transitional and post-discharge support program following psychiatric hospitalisation |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a peer-delivered, transitional and post-discharge support program following psychiatric hospitalisation |
title_short | Evaluation of a peer-delivered, transitional and post-discharge support program following psychiatric hospitalisation |
title_sort | evaluation of a peer-delivered, transitional and post-discharge support program following psychiatric hospitalisation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5571619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28836964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1469-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scanlanjustinnewton evaluationofapeerdeliveredtransitionalandpostdischargesupportprogramfollowingpsychiatrichospitalisation AT hancocknicola evaluationofapeerdeliveredtransitionalandpostdischargesupportprogramfollowingpsychiatrichospitalisation AT honeyanne evaluationofapeerdeliveredtransitionalandpostdischargesupportprogramfollowingpsychiatrichospitalisation |