Cargando…
The curative effect of liposuction curettage in the treatment of bromhidrosis: A meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: We aimed to understand the curative effect of liposuction curettage (LC) in the treatment of bromhidrosis. METHODS: Relevant studies published before January 2017were searched from the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, VIP, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases....
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5571722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28816985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007844 |
_version_ | 1783259401864347648 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Lianbo Chen, Feifei Kong, Jiao Li, Zhuonan Wen, Xiaoqiang Liu, Jun |
author_facet | Zhang, Lianbo Chen, Feifei Kong, Jiao Li, Zhuonan Wen, Xiaoqiang Liu, Jun |
author_sort | Zhang, Lianbo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We aimed to understand the curative effect of liposuction curettage (LC) in the treatment of bromhidrosis. METHODS: Relevant studies published before January 2017were searched from the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, VIP, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases. Parameters including recurrence, complications, complete response, and overall response were assessed. Meta-analysis was performed using the R 3.12 statistical package. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were used for dichotomous data. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q-statistic and I(2) test. In addition, Egger's test was conducted to detect publication bias. RESULTS: Ten studies with a total of 1124 participants (545 cases and 579 controls) were included. There was no statistical difference in recurrence (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.51–2.74), complete response (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.25–1.74), or overall response (OR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.21–1.87) between the case and control groups. The incidence of complications in the case group was lower than that in the control group (OR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.08–0.67) and open excision group (OR = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.07–0.19). Publication bias existed for the recurrence index in the open excision group (t = 3.3979, P = .04), but no publication bias was found in other subgroups, indicating stable results. CONCLUSIONS: LC, which has fewer complications, can be considered the primary choice in the treatment of patients with bromhidrosis compared with other surgical procedures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5571722 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55717222017-09-07 The curative effect of liposuction curettage in the treatment of bromhidrosis: A meta-analysis Zhang, Lianbo Chen, Feifei Kong, Jiao Li, Zhuonan Wen, Xiaoqiang Liu, Jun Medicine (Baltimore) 4000 BACKGROUND: We aimed to understand the curative effect of liposuction curettage (LC) in the treatment of bromhidrosis. METHODS: Relevant studies published before January 2017were searched from the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, VIP, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases. Parameters including recurrence, complications, complete response, and overall response were assessed. Meta-analysis was performed using the R 3.12 statistical package. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were used for dichotomous data. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q-statistic and I(2) test. In addition, Egger's test was conducted to detect publication bias. RESULTS: Ten studies with a total of 1124 participants (545 cases and 579 controls) were included. There was no statistical difference in recurrence (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.51–2.74), complete response (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.25–1.74), or overall response (OR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.21–1.87) between the case and control groups. The incidence of complications in the case group was lower than that in the control group (OR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.08–0.67) and open excision group (OR = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.07–0.19). Publication bias existed for the recurrence index in the open excision group (t = 3.3979, P = .04), but no publication bias was found in other subgroups, indicating stable results. CONCLUSIONS: LC, which has fewer complications, can be considered the primary choice in the treatment of patients with bromhidrosis compared with other surgical procedures. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5571722/ /pubmed/28816985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007844 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 4000 Zhang, Lianbo Chen, Feifei Kong, Jiao Li, Zhuonan Wen, Xiaoqiang Liu, Jun The curative effect of liposuction curettage in the treatment of bromhidrosis: A meta-analysis |
title | The curative effect of liposuction curettage in the treatment of bromhidrosis: A meta-analysis |
title_full | The curative effect of liposuction curettage in the treatment of bromhidrosis: A meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The curative effect of liposuction curettage in the treatment of bromhidrosis: A meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The curative effect of liposuction curettage in the treatment of bromhidrosis: A meta-analysis |
title_short | The curative effect of liposuction curettage in the treatment of bromhidrosis: A meta-analysis |
title_sort | curative effect of liposuction curettage in the treatment of bromhidrosis: a meta-analysis |
topic | 4000 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5571722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28816985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007844 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhanglianbo thecurativeeffectofliposuctioncurettageinthetreatmentofbromhidrosisametaanalysis AT chenfeifei thecurativeeffectofliposuctioncurettageinthetreatmentofbromhidrosisametaanalysis AT kongjiao thecurativeeffectofliposuctioncurettageinthetreatmentofbromhidrosisametaanalysis AT lizhuonan thecurativeeffectofliposuctioncurettageinthetreatmentofbromhidrosisametaanalysis AT wenxiaoqiang thecurativeeffectofliposuctioncurettageinthetreatmentofbromhidrosisametaanalysis AT liujun thecurativeeffectofliposuctioncurettageinthetreatmentofbromhidrosisametaanalysis AT zhanglianbo curativeeffectofliposuctioncurettageinthetreatmentofbromhidrosisametaanalysis AT chenfeifei curativeeffectofliposuctioncurettageinthetreatmentofbromhidrosisametaanalysis AT kongjiao curativeeffectofliposuctioncurettageinthetreatmentofbromhidrosisametaanalysis AT lizhuonan curativeeffectofliposuctioncurettageinthetreatmentofbromhidrosisametaanalysis AT wenxiaoqiang curativeeffectofliposuctioncurettageinthetreatmentofbromhidrosisametaanalysis AT liujun curativeeffectofliposuctioncurettageinthetreatmentofbromhidrosisametaanalysis |