Cargando…

The curative effect of liposuction curettage in the treatment of bromhidrosis: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: We aimed to understand the curative effect of liposuction curettage (LC) in the treatment of bromhidrosis. METHODS: Relevant studies published before January 2017were searched from the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, VIP, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Lianbo, Chen, Feifei, Kong, Jiao, Li, Zhuonan, Wen, Xiaoqiang, Liu, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5571722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28816985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007844
_version_ 1783259401864347648
author Zhang, Lianbo
Chen, Feifei
Kong, Jiao
Li, Zhuonan
Wen, Xiaoqiang
Liu, Jun
author_facet Zhang, Lianbo
Chen, Feifei
Kong, Jiao
Li, Zhuonan
Wen, Xiaoqiang
Liu, Jun
author_sort Zhang, Lianbo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We aimed to understand the curative effect of liposuction curettage (LC) in the treatment of bromhidrosis. METHODS: Relevant studies published before January 2017were searched from the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, VIP, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases. Parameters including recurrence, complications, complete response, and overall response were assessed. Meta-analysis was performed using the R 3.12 statistical package. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were used for dichotomous data. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q-statistic and I(2) test. In addition, Egger's test was conducted to detect publication bias. RESULTS: Ten studies with a total of 1124 participants (545 cases and 579 controls) were included. There was no statistical difference in recurrence (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.51–2.74), complete response (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.25–1.74), or overall response (OR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.21–1.87) between the case and control groups. The incidence of complications in the case group was lower than that in the control group (OR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.08–0.67) and open excision group (OR = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.07–0.19). Publication bias existed for the recurrence index in the open excision group (t = 3.3979, P = .04), but no publication bias was found in other subgroups, indicating stable results. CONCLUSIONS: LC, which has fewer complications, can be considered the primary choice in the treatment of patients with bromhidrosis compared with other surgical procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5571722
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55717222017-09-07 The curative effect of liposuction curettage in the treatment of bromhidrosis: A meta-analysis Zhang, Lianbo Chen, Feifei Kong, Jiao Li, Zhuonan Wen, Xiaoqiang Liu, Jun Medicine (Baltimore) 4000 BACKGROUND: We aimed to understand the curative effect of liposuction curettage (LC) in the treatment of bromhidrosis. METHODS: Relevant studies published before January 2017were searched from the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, VIP, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases. Parameters including recurrence, complications, complete response, and overall response were assessed. Meta-analysis was performed using the R 3.12 statistical package. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were used for dichotomous data. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q-statistic and I(2) test. In addition, Egger's test was conducted to detect publication bias. RESULTS: Ten studies with a total of 1124 participants (545 cases and 579 controls) were included. There was no statistical difference in recurrence (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.51–2.74), complete response (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.25–1.74), or overall response (OR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.21–1.87) between the case and control groups. The incidence of complications in the case group was lower than that in the control group (OR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.08–0.67) and open excision group (OR = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.07–0.19). Publication bias existed for the recurrence index in the open excision group (t = 3.3979, P = .04), but no publication bias was found in other subgroups, indicating stable results. CONCLUSIONS: LC, which has fewer complications, can be considered the primary choice in the treatment of patients with bromhidrosis compared with other surgical procedures. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5571722/ /pubmed/28816985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007844 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle 4000
Zhang, Lianbo
Chen, Feifei
Kong, Jiao
Li, Zhuonan
Wen, Xiaoqiang
Liu, Jun
The curative effect of liposuction curettage in the treatment of bromhidrosis: A meta-analysis
title The curative effect of liposuction curettage in the treatment of bromhidrosis: A meta-analysis
title_full The curative effect of liposuction curettage in the treatment of bromhidrosis: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr The curative effect of liposuction curettage in the treatment of bromhidrosis: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The curative effect of liposuction curettage in the treatment of bromhidrosis: A meta-analysis
title_short The curative effect of liposuction curettage in the treatment of bromhidrosis: A meta-analysis
title_sort curative effect of liposuction curettage in the treatment of bromhidrosis: a meta-analysis
topic 4000
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5571722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28816985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007844
work_keys_str_mv AT zhanglianbo thecurativeeffectofliposuctioncurettageinthetreatmentofbromhidrosisametaanalysis
AT chenfeifei thecurativeeffectofliposuctioncurettageinthetreatmentofbromhidrosisametaanalysis
AT kongjiao thecurativeeffectofliposuctioncurettageinthetreatmentofbromhidrosisametaanalysis
AT lizhuonan thecurativeeffectofliposuctioncurettageinthetreatmentofbromhidrosisametaanalysis
AT wenxiaoqiang thecurativeeffectofliposuctioncurettageinthetreatmentofbromhidrosisametaanalysis
AT liujun thecurativeeffectofliposuctioncurettageinthetreatmentofbromhidrosisametaanalysis
AT zhanglianbo curativeeffectofliposuctioncurettageinthetreatmentofbromhidrosisametaanalysis
AT chenfeifei curativeeffectofliposuctioncurettageinthetreatmentofbromhidrosisametaanalysis
AT kongjiao curativeeffectofliposuctioncurettageinthetreatmentofbromhidrosisametaanalysis
AT lizhuonan curativeeffectofliposuctioncurettageinthetreatmentofbromhidrosisametaanalysis
AT wenxiaoqiang curativeeffectofliposuctioncurettageinthetreatmentofbromhidrosisametaanalysis
AT liujun curativeeffectofliposuctioncurettageinthetreatmentofbromhidrosisametaanalysis