Cargando…

What macromolecular crystallogenesis tells us – what is needed in the future

Crystallogenesis is a longstanding topic that has transformed into a discipline that is mainly focused on the preparation of crystals for practising crystallo­graphers. Although the idiosyncratic features of proteins have to be taken into account, the crystallization of proteins is governed by the s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Giegé, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Union of Crystallography 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5571797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28875021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2052252517006595
_version_ 1783259409139367936
author Giegé, Richard
author_facet Giegé, Richard
author_sort Giegé, Richard
collection PubMed
description Crystallogenesis is a longstanding topic that has transformed into a discipline that is mainly focused on the preparation of crystals for practising crystallo­graphers. Although the idiosyncratic features of proteins have to be taken into account, the crystallization of proteins is governed by the same physics as the crystallization of inorganic materials. At present, a diversified panel of crystallization methods adapted to proteins has been validated, and although only a few methods are in current practice, the success rate of crystallization has increased constantly, leading to the determination of ∼10(5) X-ray structures. These structures reveal a huge repertoire of protein folds, but they only cover a restricted part of macromolecular diversity across the tree of life. In the future, crystals representative of missing structures or that will better document the structural dynamics and functional steps underlying biological processes need to be grown. For the pertinent choice of biologically relevant targets, computer-guided analysis of structural databases is needed. From another perspective, crystallization is a self-assembly process that can occur in the bulk of crowded fluids, with crystals being supramolecular assemblies. Life also uses self-assembly and supramolecular processes leading to transient, or less often stable, complexes. An integrated view of supramolecularity implies that proteins crystallizing either in vitro or in vivo or participating in cellular processes share common attributes, notably determinants and antideterminants that favour or disfavour their correct or incorrect associations. As a result, under in vivo conditions proteins show a balance between features that favour or disfavour association. If this balance is broken, disorders/diseases occur. Understanding crystallization under in vivo conditions is a challenge for the future. In this quest, the analysis of packing contacts and contacts within oligomers will be crucial in order to decipher the rules governing protein self-assembly and will guide the engineering of novel biomaterials. In a wider perspective, understanding such contacts will open the route towards supramolecular biology and generalized crystallogenesis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5571797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher International Union of Crystallography
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55717972017-09-05 What macromolecular crystallogenesis tells us – what is needed in the future Giegé, Richard IUCrJ Feature Articles Crystallogenesis is a longstanding topic that has transformed into a discipline that is mainly focused on the preparation of crystals for practising crystallo­graphers. Although the idiosyncratic features of proteins have to be taken into account, the crystallization of proteins is governed by the same physics as the crystallization of inorganic materials. At present, a diversified panel of crystallization methods adapted to proteins has been validated, and although only a few methods are in current practice, the success rate of crystallization has increased constantly, leading to the determination of ∼10(5) X-ray structures. These structures reveal a huge repertoire of protein folds, but they only cover a restricted part of macromolecular diversity across the tree of life. In the future, crystals representative of missing structures or that will better document the structural dynamics and functional steps underlying biological processes need to be grown. For the pertinent choice of biologically relevant targets, computer-guided analysis of structural databases is needed. From another perspective, crystallization is a self-assembly process that can occur in the bulk of crowded fluids, with crystals being supramolecular assemblies. Life also uses self-assembly and supramolecular processes leading to transient, or less often stable, complexes. An integrated view of supramolecularity implies that proteins crystallizing either in vitro or in vivo or participating in cellular processes share common attributes, notably determinants and antideterminants that favour or disfavour their correct or incorrect associations. As a result, under in vivo conditions proteins show a balance between features that favour or disfavour association. If this balance is broken, disorders/diseases occur. Understanding crystallization under in vivo conditions is a challenge for the future. In this quest, the analysis of packing contacts and contacts within oligomers will be crucial in order to decipher the rules governing protein self-assembly and will guide the engineering of novel biomaterials. In a wider perspective, understanding such contacts will open the route towards supramolecular biology and generalized crystallogenesis. International Union of Crystallography 2017-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5571797/ /pubmed/28875021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2052252517006595 Text en © Richard Giegé 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/uk/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/uk/
spellingShingle Feature Articles
Giegé, Richard
What macromolecular crystallogenesis tells us – what is needed in the future
title What macromolecular crystallogenesis tells us – what is needed in the future
title_full What macromolecular crystallogenesis tells us – what is needed in the future
title_fullStr What macromolecular crystallogenesis tells us – what is needed in the future
title_full_unstemmed What macromolecular crystallogenesis tells us – what is needed in the future
title_short What macromolecular crystallogenesis tells us – what is needed in the future
title_sort what macromolecular crystallogenesis tells us – what is needed in the future
topic Feature Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5571797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28875021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2052252517006595
work_keys_str_mv AT giegerichard whatmacromolecularcrystallogenesistellsuswhatisneededinthefuture