Cargando…
Validation of experimental charge-density refinement strategies: when do we overfit?
A cross-validation method is supplied to judge between various strategies in multipole refinement procedures. Its application enables straightforward detection of whether the refinement of additional parameters leads to an improvement in the model or an overfitting of the given data. For all tested...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Union of Crystallography
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5571805/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28875029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2052252517005103 |
_version_ | 1783259411114885120 |
---|---|
author | Krause, Lennard Niepötter, Benedikt Schürmann, Christian J. Stalke, Dietmar Herbst-Irmer, Regine |
author_facet | Krause, Lennard Niepötter, Benedikt Schürmann, Christian J. Stalke, Dietmar Herbst-Irmer, Regine |
author_sort | Krause, Lennard |
collection | PubMed |
description | A cross-validation method is supplied to judge between various strategies in multipole refinement procedures. Its application enables straightforward detection of whether the refinement of additional parameters leads to an improvement in the model or an overfitting of the given data. For all tested data sets it was possible to prove that the multipole parameters of atoms in comparable chemical environments should be constrained to be identical. In an automated approach, this method additionally delivers parameter distributions of k different refinements. These distributions can be used for further error diagnostics, e.g. to detect erroneously defined parameters or incorrectly determined reflections. Visualization tools show the variation in the parameters. These different refinements also provide rough estimates for the standard deviation of topological parameters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5571805 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | International Union of Crystallography |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55718052017-09-05 Validation of experimental charge-density refinement strategies: when do we overfit? Krause, Lennard Niepötter, Benedikt Schürmann, Christian J. Stalke, Dietmar Herbst-Irmer, Regine IUCrJ Research Papers A cross-validation method is supplied to judge between various strategies in multipole refinement procedures. Its application enables straightforward detection of whether the refinement of additional parameters leads to an improvement in the model or an overfitting of the given data. For all tested data sets it was possible to prove that the multipole parameters of atoms in comparable chemical environments should be constrained to be identical. In an automated approach, this method additionally delivers parameter distributions of k different refinements. These distributions can be used for further error diagnostics, e.g. to detect erroneously defined parameters or incorrectly determined reflections. Visualization tools show the variation in the parameters. These different refinements also provide rough estimates for the standard deviation of topological parameters. International Union of Crystallography 2017-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5571805/ /pubmed/28875029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2052252517005103 Text en © Lennard Krause et al. 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/uk/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/uk/ |
spellingShingle | Research Papers Krause, Lennard Niepötter, Benedikt Schürmann, Christian J. Stalke, Dietmar Herbst-Irmer, Regine Validation of experimental charge-density refinement strategies: when do we overfit? |
title | Validation of experimental charge-density refinement strategies: when do we overfit? |
title_full | Validation of experimental charge-density refinement strategies: when do we overfit? |
title_fullStr | Validation of experimental charge-density refinement strategies: when do we overfit? |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of experimental charge-density refinement strategies: when do we overfit? |
title_short | Validation of experimental charge-density refinement strategies: when do we overfit? |
title_sort | validation of experimental charge-density refinement strategies: when do we overfit? |
topic | Research Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5571805/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28875029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2052252517005103 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krauselennard validationofexperimentalchargedensityrefinementstrategieswhendoweoverfit AT niepotterbenedikt validationofexperimentalchargedensityrefinementstrategieswhendoweoverfit AT schurmannchristianj validationofexperimentalchargedensityrefinementstrategieswhendoweoverfit AT stalkedietmar validationofexperimentalchargedensityrefinementstrategieswhendoweoverfit AT herbstirmerregine validationofexperimentalchargedensityrefinementstrategieswhendoweoverfit |