Cargando…

Validation of experimental charge-density refinement strategies: when do we overfit?

A cross-validation method is supplied to judge between various strategies in multipole refinement procedures. Its application enables straightforward detection of whether the refinement of additional parameters leads to an improvement in the model or an overfitting of the given data. For all tested...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krause, Lennard, Niepötter, Benedikt, Schürmann, Christian J., Stalke, Dietmar, Herbst-Irmer, Regine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Union of Crystallography 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5571805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28875029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2052252517005103
_version_ 1783259411114885120
author Krause, Lennard
Niepötter, Benedikt
Schürmann, Christian J.
Stalke, Dietmar
Herbst-Irmer, Regine
author_facet Krause, Lennard
Niepötter, Benedikt
Schürmann, Christian J.
Stalke, Dietmar
Herbst-Irmer, Regine
author_sort Krause, Lennard
collection PubMed
description A cross-validation method is supplied to judge between various strategies in multipole refinement procedures. Its application enables straightforward detection of whether the refinement of additional parameters leads to an improvement in the model or an overfitting of the given data. For all tested data sets it was possible to prove that the multipole parameters of atoms in comparable chemical environments should be constrained to be identical. In an automated approach, this method additionally delivers parameter distributions of k different refinements. These distributions can be used for further error diagnostics, e.g. to detect erroneously defined parameters or incorrectly determined reflections. Visualization tools show the variation in the parameters. These different refinements also provide rough estimates for the standard deviation of topological parameters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5571805
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher International Union of Crystallography
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55718052017-09-05 Validation of experimental charge-density refinement strategies: when do we overfit? Krause, Lennard Niepötter, Benedikt Schürmann, Christian J. Stalke, Dietmar Herbst-Irmer, Regine IUCrJ Research Papers A cross-validation method is supplied to judge between various strategies in multipole refinement procedures. Its application enables straightforward detection of whether the refinement of additional parameters leads to an improvement in the model or an overfitting of the given data. For all tested data sets it was possible to prove that the multipole parameters of atoms in comparable chemical environments should be constrained to be identical. In an automated approach, this method additionally delivers parameter distributions of k different refinements. These distributions can be used for further error diagnostics, e.g. to detect erroneously defined parameters or incorrectly determined reflections. Visualization tools show the variation in the parameters. These different refinements also provide rough estimates for the standard deviation of topological parameters. International Union of Crystallography 2017-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5571805/ /pubmed/28875029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2052252517005103 Text en © Lennard Krause et al. 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/uk/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/uk/
spellingShingle Research Papers
Krause, Lennard
Niepötter, Benedikt
Schürmann, Christian J.
Stalke, Dietmar
Herbst-Irmer, Regine
Validation of experimental charge-density refinement strategies: when do we overfit?
title Validation of experimental charge-density refinement strategies: when do we overfit?
title_full Validation of experimental charge-density refinement strategies: when do we overfit?
title_fullStr Validation of experimental charge-density refinement strategies: when do we overfit?
title_full_unstemmed Validation of experimental charge-density refinement strategies: when do we overfit?
title_short Validation of experimental charge-density refinement strategies: when do we overfit?
title_sort validation of experimental charge-density refinement strategies: when do we overfit?
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5571805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28875029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2052252517005103
work_keys_str_mv AT krauselennard validationofexperimentalchargedensityrefinementstrategieswhendoweoverfit
AT niepotterbenedikt validationofexperimentalchargedensityrefinementstrategieswhendoweoverfit
AT schurmannchristianj validationofexperimentalchargedensityrefinementstrategieswhendoweoverfit
AT stalkedietmar validationofexperimentalchargedensityrefinementstrategieswhendoweoverfit
AT herbstirmerregine validationofexperimentalchargedensityrefinementstrategieswhendoweoverfit