Cargando…

Morphological analysis of interbody fusion following posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cages using computed tomography

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) using cages in conjunction with pedicle screw fixation is considered the gold standard for surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar spine disorders due to its biomechanical stability and high fusion rate. However, research regarding patterns of fusion in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seo, Dong Kwang, Kim, Myeong Jong, Roh, Sung Woo, Jeon, Sang Ryong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5572007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28834885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007816
_version_ 1783259449003081728
author Seo, Dong Kwang
Kim, Myeong Jong
Roh, Sung Woo
Jeon, Sang Ryong
author_facet Seo, Dong Kwang
Kim, Myeong Jong
Roh, Sung Woo
Jeon, Sang Ryong
author_sort Seo, Dong Kwang
collection PubMed
description Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) using cages in conjunction with pedicle screw fixation is considered the gold standard for surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar spine disorders due to its biomechanical stability and high fusion rate. However, research regarding patterns of fusion in the interbody space during the early postoperative period is lacking. Sixty consecutive patients were recruited from May 2013 to June 2015. All patients underwent PLIF using 2 titanium cages filled with local bone chips from decompressed lamina and facet bone in conjunction with pedicle screw fixation. Computed tomography scans were obtained 3 to 6 months following surgery in order to evaluate the partial fusion state. Computed tomography (CT) classification of fusion morphology was divided into 8 groups and then into compartments according to fusion space, and the rate of fusion for each was calculated. Further follow-up was conducted to confirm fusion state and assess outcomes. The most frequent pattern of interbody fusion was bilateral intra-cage fusion with unilateral lateral bridging of extra-cage areas (N = 36, 43.4%); the least frequent was interspace bridging of the 2 cages alone (N = 0, 0%). The fusion rate for the intra-cage area (Compartment 1) reached 100%. However, the fusion in the lateral space outside of cages (Compartment 2) was not satisfactory, though reasonable (72.3%). All patients were confirmed as achieving adequate fusion at the final follow-up, with improved clinical outcomes. Widening of the contact area between the vertebral body and cages is recommended to promote increased interbody fusion during the early postoperative period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5572007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55720072017-09-06 Morphological analysis of interbody fusion following posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cages using computed tomography Seo, Dong Kwang Kim, Myeong Jong Roh, Sung Woo Jeon, Sang Ryong Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) using cages in conjunction with pedicle screw fixation is considered the gold standard for surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar spine disorders due to its biomechanical stability and high fusion rate. However, research regarding patterns of fusion in the interbody space during the early postoperative period is lacking. Sixty consecutive patients were recruited from May 2013 to June 2015. All patients underwent PLIF using 2 titanium cages filled with local bone chips from decompressed lamina and facet bone in conjunction with pedicle screw fixation. Computed tomography scans were obtained 3 to 6 months following surgery in order to evaluate the partial fusion state. Computed tomography (CT) classification of fusion morphology was divided into 8 groups and then into compartments according to fusion space, and the rate of fusion for each was calculated. Further follow-up was conducted to confirm fusion state and assess outcomes. The most frequent pattern of interbody fusion was bilateral intra-cage fusion with unilateral lateral bridging of extra-cage areas (N = 36, 43.4%); the least frequent was interspace bridging of the 2 cages alone (N = 0, 0%). The fusion rate for the intra-cage area (Compartment 1) reached 100%. However, the fusion in the lateral space outside of cages (Compartment 2) was not satisfactory, though reasonable (72.3%). All patients were confirmed as achieving adequate fusion at the final follow-up, with improved clinical outcomes. Widening of the contact area between the vertebral body and cages is recommended to promote increased interbody fusion during the early postoperative period. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5572007/ /pubmed/28834885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007816 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 7100
Seo, Dong Kwang
Kim, Myeong Jong
Roh, Sung Woo
Jeon, Sang Ryong
Morphological analysis of interbody fusion following posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cages using computed tomography
title Morphological analysis of interbody fusion following posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cages using computed tomography
title_full Morphological analysis of interbody fusion following posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cages using computed tomography
title_fullStr Morphological analysis of interbody fusion following posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cages using computed tomography
title_full_unstemmed Morphological analysis of interbody fusion following posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cages using computed tomography
title_short Morphological analysis of interbody fusion following posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cages using computed tomography
title_sort morphological analysis of interbody fusion following posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cages using computed tomography
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5572007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28834885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007816
work_keys_str_mv AT seodongkwang morphologicalanalysisofinterbodyfusionfollowingposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionwithcagesusingcomputedtomography
AT kimmyeongjong morphologicalanalysisofinterbodyfusionfollowingposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionwithcagesusingcomputedtomography
AT rohsungwoo morphologicalanalysisofinterbodyfusionfollowingposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionwithcagesusingcomputedtomography
AT jeonsangryong morphologicalanalysisofinterbodyfusionfollowingposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionwithcagesusingcomputedtomography