Cargando…
Implementing the WHO integrated tool to assess quality of care for mothers, newborns and children: results and lessons learnt from five districts in Malawi
BACKGROUND: In 2014 the World Health Organization (WHO) developed a new tool to be used to assess the quality of care for mothers, newborns and children provided at healthcare facility level. This paper reports on the feasibility of using the tool, its limitations and strengths. METHODS: Across 5 di...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5572070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28841850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1461-y |
_version_ | 1783259463693631488 |
---|---|
author | Smith, Helen Asfaw, Atnafu Getachew Aung, Kyaw Myint Chikoti, Lastone Mgawadere, Florence d’Aquino, Luigi van den Broek, Nynke |
author_facet | Smith, Helen Asfaw, Atnafu Getachew Aung, Kyaw Myint Chikoti, Lastone Mgawadere, Florence d’Aquino, Luigi van den Broek, Nynke |
author_sort | Smith, Helen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In 2014 the World Health Organization (WHO) developed a new tool to be used to assess the quality of care for mothers, newborns and children provided at healthcare facility level. This paper reports on the feasibility of using the tool, its limitations and strengths. METHODS: Across 5 districts in Malawi, 35 healthcare facilities were assessed. The WHO tool includes checklists, interviews and observation of case management by which care is assessed against agreed standards using a Likert scale (1 lowest: not meeting standard, 5 highest: compliant with standard). Descriptive statistics were used to provide summary scores for each standard. A ‘dashboard’ system was developed to display the results. RESULTS: For maternal care three areas met standards; 1) supportive care for admitted patients (71% of healthcare facilities scored 4 or 5); 2) prevention and management of infections during pregnancy (71% scored 4 or 5); and 3) management of unsatisfactory progress of labour (84% scored 4 or 5). Availability of essential equipment and supplies was noted to be a critical barrier to achieving satisfactory standards of paediatric care (mean score; standard deviation: 2.9; SD 0.95) and child care (2.7; SD 1.1). Infection control is inadequate across all districts for maternal, newborn and paediatric care. Quality of care varies across districts with a mean (SD) score for all standards combined of 3 (SD 0.19) for the worst performing district and 4 (SD 0.27) for the best. The best performing district has an average score of 4 (SD 0.27). Hospitals had good scores for overall infrastructure, essential drugs, organisation of care and management of preterm labour. However, health centres were better at case management of HIV/AIDS patients and follow-up of sick children. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to develop an expanded framework of standards which is inclusive of all areas of care. In addition, it is important to ensure structure, process and outcomes of health care are reflected. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5572070 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55720702017-08-30 Implementing the WHO integrated tool to assess quality of care for mothers, newborns and children: results and lessons learnt from five districts in Malawi Smith, Helen Asfaw, Atnafu Getachew Aung, Kyaw Myint Chikoti, Lastone Mgawadere, Florence d’Aquino, Luigi van den Broek, Nynke BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: In 2014 the World Health Organization (WHO) developed a new tool to be used to assess the quality of care for mothers, newborns and children provided at healthcare facility level. This paper reports on the feasibility of using the tool, its limitations and strengths. METHODS: Across 5 districts in Malawi, 35 healthcare facilities were assessed. The WHO tool includes checklists, interviews and observation of case management by which care is assessed against agreed standards using a Likert scale (1 lowest: not meeting standard, 5 highest: compliant with standard). Descriptive statistics were used to provide summary scores for each standard. A ‘dashboard’ system was developed to display the results. RESULTS: For maternal care three areas met standards; 1) supportive care for admitted patients (71% of healthcare facilities scored 4 or 5); 2) prevention and management of infections during pregnancy (71% scored 4 or 5); and 3) management of unsatisfactory progress of labour (84% scored 4 or 5). Availability of essential equipment and supplies was noted to be a critical barrier to achieving satisfactory standards of paediatric care (mean score; standard deviation: 2.9; SD 0.95) and child care (2.7; SD 1.1). Infection control is inadequate across all districts for maternal, newborn and paediatric care. Quality of care varies across districts with a mean (SD) score for all standards combined of 3 (SD 0.19) for the worst performing district and 4 (SD 0.27) for the best. The best performing district has an average score of 4 (SD 0.27). Hospitals had good scores for overall infrastructure, essential drugs, organisation of care and management of preterm labour. However, health centres were better at case management of HIV/AIDS patients and follow-up of sick children. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to develop an expanded framework of standards which is inclusive of all areas of care. In addition, it is important to ensure structure, process and outcomes of health care are reflected. BioMed Central 2017-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5572070/ /pubmed/28841850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1461-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Smith, Helen Asfaw, Atnafu Getachew Aung, Kyaw Myint Chikoti, Lastone Mgawadere, Florence d’Aquino, Luigi van den Broek, Nynke Implementing the WHO integrated tool to assess quality of care for mothers, newborns and children: results and lessons learnt from five districts in Malawi |
title | Implementing the WHO integrated tool to assess quality of care for mothers, newborns and children: results and lessons learnt from five districts in Malawi |
title_full | Implementing the WHO integrated tool to assess quality of care for mothers, newborns and children: results and lessons learnt from five districts in Malawi |
title_fullStr | Implementing the WHO integrated tool to assess quality of care for mothers, newborns and children: results and lessons learnt from five districts in Malawi |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementing the WHO integrated tool to assess quality of care for mothers, newborns and children: results and lessons learnt from five districts in Malawi |
title_short | Implementing the WHO integrated tool to assess quality of care for mothers, newborns and children: results and lessons learnt from five districts in Malawi |
title_sort | implementing the who integrated tool to assess quality of care for mothers, newborns and children: results and lessons learnt from five districts in malawi |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5572070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28841850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1461-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithhelen implementingthewhointegratedtooltoassessqualityofcareformothersnewbornsandchildrenresultsandlessonslearntfromfivedistrictsinmalawi AT asfawatnafugetachew implementingthewhointegratedtooltoassessqualityofcareformothersnewbornsandchildrenresultsandlessonslearntfromfivedistrictsinmalawi AT aungkyawmyint implementingthewhointegratedtooltoassessqualityofcareformothersnewbornsandchildrenresultsandlessonslearntfromfivedistrictsinmalawi AT chikotilastone implementingthewhointegratedtooltoassessqualityofcareformothersnewbornsandchildrenresultsandlessonslearntfromfivedistrictsinmalawi AT mgawadereflorence implementingthewhointegratedtooltoassessqualityofcareformothersnewbornsandchildrenresultsandlessonslearntfromfivedistrictsinmalawi AT daquinoluigi implementingthewhointegratedtooltoassessqualityofcareformothersnewbornsandchildrenresultsandlessonslearntfromfivedistrictsinmalawi AT vandenbroeknynke implementingthewhointegratedtooltoassessqualityofcareformothersnewbornsandchildrenresultsandlessonslearntfromfivedistrictsinmalawi |