Cargando…
Working Memory Capacity Limits Motor Learning When Implementing Multiple Instructions
Although it is generally accepted that certain practice conditions can place large demands on working memory (WM) when performing and learning a motor skill, the influence that WM capacity has on the acquisition of motor skills remains unsubstantiated. This study examined the role of WM capacity in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5572292/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28878701 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01350 |
_version_ | 1783259500241747968 |
---|---|
author | Buszard, Tim Farrow, Damian Verswijveren, Simone J. J. M. Reid, Machar Williams, Jacqueline Polman, Remco Ling, Fiona Chun Man Masters, Rich S. W. |
author_facet | Buszard, Tim Farrow, Damian Verswijveren, Simone J. J. M. Reid, Machar Williams, Jacqueline Polman, Remco Ling, Fiona Chun Man Masters, Rich S. W. |
author_sort | Buszard, Tim |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although it is generally accepted that certain practice conditions can place large demands on working memory (WM) when performing and learning a motor skill, the influence that WM capacity has on the acquisition of motor skills remains unsubstantiated. This study examined the role of WM capacity in a motor skill practice context that promoted WM involvement through the provision of explicit instructions. A cohort of 90 children aged 8 to 10 years were assessed on measures of WM capacity and attention. Children who scored in the lowest and highest thirds on the WM tasks were allocated to lower WM capacity (n = 24) and higher WM capacity (n = 24) groups, respectively. The remaining 42 participants did not participate in the motor task. The motor task required children to practice basketball shooting for 240 trials in blocks of 20 shots, with pre- and post-tests occurring before and after the intervention. A retention test was administered 1 week after the post-test. Prior to every practice block, children were provided with five explicit instructions that were specific to the technique of shooting a basketball. Results revealed that the higher WM capacity group displayed consistent improvements from pre- to post-test and through to the retention test, while the opposite effect occurred in the lower WM capacity group. This implies that the explicit instructions had a negative influence on learning by the lower WM capacity children. Results are discussed in relation to strategy selection for dealing with instructions and the role of attention control. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5572292 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55722922017-09-06 Working Memory Capacity Limits Motor Learning When Implementing Multiple Instructions Buszard, Tim Farrow, Damian Verswijveren, Simone J. J. M. Reid, Machar Williams, Jacqueline Polman, Remco Ling, Fiona Chun Man Masters, Rich S. W. Front Psychol Psychology Although it is generally accepted that certain practice conditions can place large demands on working memory (WM) when performing and learning a motor skill, the influence that WM capacity has on the acquisition of motor skills remains unsubstantiated. This study examined the role of WM capacity in a motor skill practice context that promoted WM involvement through the provision of explicit instructions. A cohort of 90 children aged 8 to 10 years were assessed on measures of WM capacity and attention. Children who scored in the lowest and highest thirds on the WM tasks were allocated to lower WM capacity (n = 24) and higher WM capacity (n = 24) groups, respectively. The remaining 42 participants did not participate in the motor task. The motor task required children to practice basketball shooting for 240 trials in blocks of 20 shots, with pre- and post-tests occurring before and after the intervention. A retention test was administered 1 week after the post-test. Prior to every practice block, children were provided with five explicit instructions that were specific to the technique of shooting a basketball. Results revealed that the higher WM capacity group displayed consistent improvements from pre- to post-test and through to the retention test, while the opposite effect occurred in the lower WM capacity group. This implies that the explicit instructions had a negative influence on learning by the lower WM capacity children. Results are discussed in relation to strategy selection for dealing with instructions and the role of attention control. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5572292/ /pubmed/28878701 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01350 Text en Copyright © 2017 Buszard, Farrow, Verswijveren, Reid, Williams, Polman, Ling and Masters. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Buszard, Tim Farrow, Damian Verswijveren, Simone J. J. M. Reid, Machar Williams, Jacqueline Polman, Remco Ling, Fiona Chun Man Masters, Rich S. W. Working Memory Capacity Limits Motor Learning When Implementing Multiple Instructions |
title | Working Memory Capacity Limits Motor Learning When Implementing Multiple Instructions |
title_full | Working Memory Capacity Limits Motor Learning When Implementing Multiple Instructions |
title_fullStr | Working Memory Capacity Limits Motor Learning When Implementing Multiple Instructions |
title_full_unstemmed | Working Memory Capacity Limits Motor Learning When Implementing Multiple Instructions |
title_short | Working Memory Capacity Limits Motor Learning When Implementing Multiple Instructions |
title_sort | working memory capacity limits motor learning when implementing multiple instructions |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5572292/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28878701 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01350 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT buszardtim workingmemorycapacitylimitsmotorlearningwhenimplementingmultipleinstructions AT farrowdamian workingmemorycapacitylimitsmotorlearningwhenimplementingmultipleinstructions AT verswijverensimonejjm workingmemorycapacitylimitsmotorlearningwhenimplementingmultipleinstructions AT reidmachar workingmemorycapacitylimitsmotorlearningwhenimplementingmultipleinstructions AT williamsjacqueline workingmemorycapacitylimitsmotorlearningwhenimplementingmultipleinstructions AT polmanremco workingmemorycapacitylimitsmotorlearningwhenimplementingmultipleinstructions AT lingfionachunman workingmemorycapacitylimitsmotorlearningwhenimplementingmultipleinstructions AT mastersrichsw workingmemorycapacitylimitsmotorlearningwhenimplementingmultipleinstructions |