Cargando…
Validation of Joint Position Sense of Dorsi-Plantar Flexion of Ankle Measurements Using a Smartphone
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated and validated the reliability of smartphones as measuring equipment for the dorsi-plantar flexion of ankle joint position sense (JPS) ability. METHODS: The subjects were 20 healthy young students in their 20s. We confirmed the concurrent validity by comparison with e...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Medical Informatics
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5572522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28875053 http://dx.doi.org/10.4258/hir.2017.23.3.183 |
_version_ | 1783259540108607488 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Daehee Han, Seulki |
author_facet | Lee, Daehee Han, Seulki |
author_sort | Lee, Daehee |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated and validated the reliability of smartphones as measuring equipment for the dorsi-plantar flexion of ankle joint position sense (JPS) ability. METHODS: The subjects were 20 healthy young students in their 20s. We confirmed the concurrent validity by comparison with existing electrogoniometer data. The reliability of the smartphone was confirmed using the test-retest method. RESULTS: In the case of dorsiflexion, there was no significant difference between the smartphone and electrogoniometer groups (p > 0.05). Regarding the correlation, it was significantly high (r = 0.65, p < 0.05), and ICC(3,1) was good (ICC(3,1) = 0.79). For the case of plantar flexion, there was no significant difference between the smartphone and electrogoniometer groups (p > 0.05), the correlation was significantly high (r = 0.69, p < 0.05), and the ICC(3,1) was very good (ICC(3,1) = 0.82). In the case of dorsiflexion, there was no significant difference between test and retest (p > 0.05), the correlation was intermediate (r = 0.59, p < 0.05), and the ICC(3,1) value was good (ICC(3,1) = 0.74). For plantar flexion, there was no significant difference between test and retest (p > 0.05), the correlation was significantly high (r = 0.63, p < 0.05), and the ICC(3,1) was good (ICC(3,1) = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that smartphones provide high validity and reliability as measurement equipment for JPS of dorsi-plantar flexion of the ankle. Finally, the study also considers that smartphone-based JPS measuring methods may replace the traditional and expensive methods that are currently being used for the same purpose. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5572522 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Korean Society of Medical Informatics |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55725222017-09-05 Validation of Joint Position Sense of Dorsi-Plantar Flexion of Ankle Measurements Using a Smartphone Lee, Daehee Han, Seulki Healthc Inform Res Original Article OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated and validated the reliability of smartphones as measuring equipment for the dorsi-plantar flexion of ankle joint position sense (JPS) ability. METHODS: The subjects were 20 healthy young students in their 20s. We confirmed the concurrent validity by comparison with existing electrogoniometer data. The reliability of the smartphone was confirmed using the test-retest method. RESULTS: In the case of dorsiflexion, there was no significant difference between the smartphone and electrogoniometer groups (p > 0.05). Regarding the correlation, it was significantly high (r = 0.65, p < 0.05), and ICC(3,1) was good (ICC(3,1) = 0.79). For the case of plantar flexion, there was no significant difference between the smartphone and electrogoniometer groups (p > 0.05), the correlation was significantly high (r = 0.69, p < 0.05), and the ICC(3,1) was very good (ICC(3,1) = 0.82). In the case of dorsiflexion, there was no significant difference between test and retest (p > 0.05), the correlation was intermediate (r = 0.59, p < 0.05), and the ICC(3,1) value was good (ICC(3,1) = 0.74). For plantar flexion, there was no significant difference between test and retest (p > 0.05), the correlation was significantly high (r = 0.63, p < 0.05), and the ICC(3,1) was good (ICC(3,1) = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that smartphones provide high validity and reliability as measurement equipment for JPS of dorsi-plantar flexion of the ankle. Finally, the study also considers that smartphone-based JPS measuring methods may replace the traditional and expensive methods that are currently being used for the same purpose. Korean Society of Medical Informatics 2017-07 2017-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5572522/ /pubmed/28875053 http://dx.doi.org/10.4258/hir.2017.23.3.183 Text en © 2017 The Korean Society of Medical Informatics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lee, Daehee Han, Seulki Validation of Joint Position Sense of Dorsi-Plantar Flexion of Ankle Measurements Using a Smartphone |
title | Validation of Joint Position Sense of Dorsi-Plantar Flexion of Ankle Measurements Using a Smartphone |
title_full | Validation of Joint Position Sense of Dorsi-Plantar Flexion of Ankle Measurements Using a Smartphone |
title_fullStr | Validation of Joint Position Sense of Dorsi-Plantar Flexion of Ankle Measurements Using a Smartphone |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of Joint Position Sense of Dorsi-Plantar Flexion of Ankle Measurements Using a Smartphone |
title_short | Validation of Joint Position Sense of Dorsi-Plantar Flexion of Ankle Measurements Using a Smartphone |
title_sort | validation of joint position sense of dorsi-plantar flexion of ankle measurements using a smartphone |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5572522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28875053 http://dx.doi.org/10.4258/hir.2017.23.3.183 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leedaehee validationofjointpositionsenseofdorsiplantarflexionofanklemeasurementsusingasmartphone AT hanseulki validationofjointpositionsenseofdorsiplantarflexionofanklemeasurementsusingasmartphone |