Cargando…

Validation of Joint Position Sense of Dorsi-Plantar Flexion of Ankle Measurements Using a Smartphone

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated and validated the reliability of smartphones as measuring equipment for the dorsi-plantar flexion of ankle joint position sense (JPS) ability. METHODS: The subjects were 20 healthy young students in their 20s. We confirmed the concurrent validity by comparison with e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Daehee, Han, Seulki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Medical Informatics 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5572522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28875053
http://dx.doi.org/10.4258/hir.2017.23.3.183
_version_ 1783259540108607488
author Lee, Daehee
Han, Seulki
author_facet Lee, Daehee
Han, Seulki
author_sort Lee, Daehee
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated and validated the reliability of smartphones as measuring equipment for the dorsi-plantar flexion of ankle joint position sense (JPS) ability. METHODS: The subjects were 20 healthy young students in their 20s. We confirmed the concurrent validity by comparison with existing electrogoniometer data. The reliability of the smartphone was confirmed using the test-retest method. RESULTS: In the case of dorsiflexion, there was no significant difference between the smartphone and electrogoniometer groups (p > 0.05). Regarding the correlation, it was significantly high (r = 0.65, p < 0.05), and ICC(3,1) was good (ICC(3,1) = 0.79). For the case of plantar flexion, there was no significant difference between the smartphone and electrogoniometer groups (p > 0.05), the correlation was significantly high (r = 0.69, p < 0.05), and the ICC(3,1) was very good (ICC(3,1) = 0.82). In the case of dorsiflexion, there was no significant difference between test and retest (p > 0.05), the correlation was intermediate (r = 0.59, p < 0.05), and the ICC(3,1) value was good (ICC(3,1) = 0.74). For plantar flexion, there was no significant difference between test and retest (p > 0.05), the correlation was significantly high (r = 0.63, p < 0.05), and the ICC(3,1) was good (ICC(3,1) = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that smartphones provide high validity and reliability as measurement equipment for JPS of dorsi-plantar flexion of the ankle. Finally, the study also considers that smartphone-based JPS measuring methods may replace the traditional and expensive methods that are currently being used for the same purpose.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5572522
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Korean Society of Medical Informatics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55725222017-09-05 Validation of Joint Position Sense of Dorsi-Plantar Flexion of Ankle Measurements Using a Smartphone Lee, Daehee Han, Seulki Healthc Inform Res Original Article OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated and validated the reliability of smartphones as measuring equipment for the dorsi-plantar flexion of ankle joint position sense (JPS) ability. METHODS: The subjects were 20 healthy young students in their 20s. We confirmed the concurrent validity by comparison with existing electrogoniometer data. The reliability of the smartphone was confirmed using the test-retest method. RESULTS: In the case of dorsiflexion, there was no significant difference between the smartphone and electrogoniometer groups (p > 0.05). Regarding the correlation, it was significantly high (r = 0.65, p < 0.05), and ICC(3,1) was good (ICC(3,1) = 0.79). For the case of plantar flexion, there was no significant difference between the smartphone and electrogoniometer groups (p > 0.05), the correlation was significantly high (r = 0.69, p < 0.05), and the ICC(3,1) was very good (ICC(3,1) = 0.82). In the case of dorsiflexion, there was no significant difference between test and retest (p > 0.05), the correlation was intermediate (r = 0.59, p < 0.05), and the ICC(3,1) value was good (ICC(3,1) = 0.74). For plantar flexion, there was no significant difference between test and retest (p > 0.05), the correlation was significantly high (r = 0.63, p < 0.05), and the ICC(3,1) was good (ICC(3,1) = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that smartphones provide high validity and reliability as measurement equipment for JPS of dorsi-plantar flexion of the ankle. Finally, the study also considers that smartphone-based JPS measuring methods may replace the traditional and expensive methods that are currently being used for the same purpose. Korean Society of Medical Informatics 2017-07 2017-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5572522/ /pubmed/28875053 http://dx.doi.org/10.4258/hir.2017.23.3.183 Text en © 2017 The Korean Society of Medical Informatics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Daehee
Han, Seulki
Validation of Joint Position Sense of Dorsi-Plantar Flexion of Ankle Measurements Using a Smartphone
title Validation of Joint Position Sense of Dorsi-Plantar Flexion of Ankle Measurements Using a Smartphone
title_full Validation of Joint Position Sense of Dorsi-Plantar Flexion of Ankle Measurements Using a Smartphone
title_fullStr Validation of Joint Position Sense of Dorsi-Plantar Flexion of Ankle Measurements Using a Smartphone
title_full_unstemmed Validation of Joint Position Sense of Dorsi-Plantar Flexion of Ankle Measurements Using a Smartphone
title_short Validation of Joint Position Sense of Dorsi-Plantar Flexion of Ankle Measurements Using a Smartphone
title_sort validation of joint position sense of dorsi-plantar flexion of ankle measurements using a smartphone
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5572522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28875053
http://dx.doi.org/10.4258/hir.2017.23.3.183
work_keys_str_mv AT leedaehee validationofjointpositionsenseofdorsiplantarflexionofanklemeasurementsusingasmartphone
AT hanseulki validationofjointpositionsenseofdorsiplantarflexionofanklemeasurementsusingasmartphone