Cargando…
A comparison of visual outcome and rotational stability of two types of toric implantable collamer lenses (TICL) : V4 versus V4c
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and rotational stability after implantation of two types of toric implantable collamer lenses (Toric ICL(™)(TICL);V4 and V4c, STAAR Surgical Co.) STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated total 48 eyes of 48 patients who und...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5573270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28846701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183335 |
_version_ | 1783259624802091008 |
---|---|
author | Hyun, Joo Lim, Dong Hui Eo, Doo Ri Hwang, Sungsoon Chung, Eui-Sang Chung, Tae-Young |
author_facet | Hyun, Joo Lim, Dong Hui Eo, Doo Ri Hwang, Sungsoon Chung, Eui-Sang Chung, Tae-Young |
author_sort | Hyun, Joo |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and rotational stability after implantation of two types of toric implantable collamer lenses (Toric ICL(™)(TICL);V4 and V4c, STAAR Surgical Co.) STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated total 48 eyes of 48 patients who underwent the implantation with V4 and V4c TICL with a central hole; A twenty-four eyes of 24 patients with V4 TICL and 24 eyes of 24 patients with V4c TICL with a central hole. Visual acuity, manifest refraction, and intraocular pressure were evaluated before and after surgery. Rotational stability (disparity between the intended axis and achieved axis) was assessed in both groups using digital anterior segment photographs, and vector analysis was also performed. RESULTS: Uncorrected visual acuity improved in both groups without significant difference (P = .111). There were no statistical differences between two groups in postoperative SE and cylindrical errors (P = .067 and .384, respectively). The mean value of rotation was 4.17±3.31° and 3.39±2.36° in the V4 and V4c TICL groups, respectively without significant difference (P = .364). Vector analysis of astigmatic correction showed no significant diffrence between two groups. CONCLUSION: V4 and V4c TICL have similar efficacy with regard to visual acuity and refractive outcomes and rotational stability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5573270 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55732702017-09-09 A comparison of visual outcome and rotational stability of two types of toric implantable collamer lenses (TICL) : V4 versus V4c Hyun, Joo Lim, Dong Hui Eo, Doo Ri Hwang, Sungsoon Chung, Eui-Sang Chung, Tae-Young PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and rotational stability after implantation of two types of toric implantable collamer lenses (Toric ICL(™)(TICL);V4 and V4c, STAAR Surgical Co.) STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated total 48 eyes of 48 patients who underwent the implantation with V4 and V4c TICL with a central hole; A twenty-four eyes of 24 patients with V4 TICL and 24 eyes of 24 patients with V4c TICL with a central hole. Visual acuity, manifest refraction, and intraocular pressure were evaluated before and after surgery. Rotational stability (disparity between the intended axis and achieved axis) was assessed in both groups using digital anterior segment photographs, and vector analysis was also performed. RESULTS: Uncorrected visual acuity improved in both groups without significant difference (P = .111). There were no statistical differences between two groups in postoperative SE and cylindrical errors (P = .067 and .384, respectively). The mean value of rotation was 4.17±3.31° and 3.39±2.36° in the V4 and V4c TICL groups, respectively without significant difference (P = .364). Vector analysis of astigmatic correction showed no significant diffrence between two groups. CONCLUSION: V4 and V4c TICL have similar efficacy with regard to visual acuity and refractive outcomes and rotational stability. Public Library of Science 2017-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5573270/ /pubmed/28846701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183335 Text en © 2017 Hyun et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hyun, Joo Lim, Dong Hui Eo, Doo Ri Hwang, Sungsoon Chung, Eui-Sang Chung, Tae-Young A comparison of visual outcome and rotational stability of two types of toric implantable collamer lenses (TICL) : V4 versus V4c |
title | A comparison of visual outcome and rotational stability of two types of toric implantable collamer lenses (TICL) : V4 versus V4c |
title_full | A comparison of visual outcome and rotational stability of two types of toric implantable collamer lenses (TICL) : V4 versus V4c |
title_fullStr | A comparison of visual outcome and rotational stability of two types of toric implantable collamer lenses (TICL) : V4 versus V4c |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of visual outcome and rotational stability of two types of toric implantable collamer lenses (TICL) : V4 versus V4c |
title_short | A comparison of visual outcome and rotational stability of two types of toric implantable collamer lenses (TICL) : V4 versus V4c |
title_sort | comparison of visual outcome and rotational stability of two types of toric implantable collamer lenses (ticl) : v4 versus v4c |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5573270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28846701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183335 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hyunjoo acomparisonofvisualoutcomeandrotationalstabilityoftwotypesoftoricimplantablecollamerlensesticlv4versusv4c AT limdonghui acomparisonofvisualoutcomeandrotationalstabilityoftwotypesoftoricimplantablecollamerlensesticlv4versusv4c AT eodoori acomparisonofvisualoutcomeandrotationalstabilityoftwotypesoftoricimplantablecollamerlensesticlv4versusv4c AT hwangsungsoon acomparisonofvisualoutcomeandrotationalstabilityoftwotypesoftoricimplantablecollamerlensesticlv4versusv4c AT chungeuisang acomparisonofvisualoutcomeandrotationalstabilityoftwotypesoftoricimplantablecollamerlensesticlv4versusv4c AT chungtaeyoung acomparisonofvisualoutcomeandrotationalstabilityoftwotypesoftoricimplantablecollamerlensesticlv4versusv4c AT hyunjoo comparisonofvisualoutcomeandrotationalstabilityoftwotypesoftoricimplantablecollamerlensesticlv4versusv4c AT limdonghui comparisonofvisualoutcomeandrotationalstabilityoftwotypesoftoricimplantablecollamerlensesticlv4versusv4c AT eodoori comparisonofvisualoutcomeandrotationalstabilityoftwotypesoftoricimplantablecollamerlensesticlv4versusv4c AT hwangsungsoon comparisonofvisualoutcomeandrotationalstabilityoftwotypesoftoricimplantablecollamerlensesticlv4versusv4c AT chungeuisang comparisonofvisualoutcomeandrotationalstabilityoftwotypesoftoricimplantablecollamerlensesticlv4versusv4c AT chungtaeyoung comparisonofvisualoutcomeandrotationalstabilityoftwotypesoftoricimplantablecollamerlensesticlv4versusv4c |