Cargando…

A comparison of visual outcome and rotational stability of two types of toric implantable collamer lenses (TICL) : V4 versus V4c

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and rotational stability after implantation of two types of toric implantable collamer lenses (Toric ICL(™)(TICL);V4 and V4c, STAAR Surgical Co.) STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated total 48 eyes of 48 patients who und...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hyun, Joo, Lim, Dong Hui, Eo, Doo Ri, Hwang, Sungsoon, Chung, Eui-Sang, Chung, Tae-Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5573270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28846701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183335
_version_ 1783259624802091008
author Hyun, Joo
Lim, Dong Hui
Eo, Doo Ri
Hwang, Sungsoon
Chung, Eui-Sang
Chung, Tae-Young
author_facet Hyun, Joo
Lim, Dong Hui
Eo, Doo Ri
Hwang, Sungsoon
Chung, Eui-Sang
Chung, Tae-Young
author_sort Hyun, Joo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and rotational stability after implantation of two types of toric implantable collamer lenses (Toric ICL(™)(TICL);V4 and V4c, STAAR Surgical Co.) STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated total 48 eyes of 48 patients who underwent the implantation with V4 and V4c TICL with a central hole; A twenty-four eyes of 24 patients with V4 TICL and 24 eyes of 24 patients with V4c TICL with a central hole. Visual acuity, manifest refraction, and intraocular pressure were evaluated before and after surgery. Rotational stability (disparity between the intended axis and achieved axis) was assessed in both groups using digital anterior segment photographs, and vector analysis was also performed. RESULTS: Uncorrected visual acuity improved in both groups without significant difference (P = .111). There were no statistical differences between two groups in postoperative SE and cylindrical errors (P = .067 and .384, respectively). The mean value of rotation was 4.17±3.31° and 3.39±2.36° in the V4 and V4c TICL groups, respectively without significant difference (P = .364). Vector analysis of astigmatic correction showed no significant diffrence between two groups. CONCLUSION: V4 and V4c TICL have similar efficacy with regard to visual acuity and refractive outcomes and rotational stability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5573270
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55732702017-09-09 A comparison of visual outcome and rotational stability of two types of toric implantable collamer lenses (TICL) : V4 versus V4c Hyun, Joo Lim, Dong Hui Eo, Doo Ri Hwang, Sungsoon Chung, Eui-Sang Chung, Tae-Young PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and rotational stability after implantation of two types of toric implantable collamer lenses (Toric ICL(™)(TICL);V4 and V4c, STAAR Surgical Co.) STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated total 48 eyes of 48 patients who underwent the implantation with V4 and V4c TICL with a central hole; A twenty-four eyes of 24 patients with V4 TICL and 24 eyes of 24 patients with V4c TICL with a central hole. Visual acuity, manifest refraction, and intraocular pressure were evaluated before and after surgery. Rotational stability (disparity between the intended axis and achieved axis) was assessed in both groups using digital anterior segment photographs, and vector analysis was also performed. RESULTS: Uncorrected visual acuity improved in both groups without significant difference (P = .111). There were no statistical differences between two groups in postoperative SE and cylindrical errors (P = .067 and .384, respectively). The mean value of rotation was 4.17±3.31° and 3.39±2.36° in the V4 and V4c TICL groups, respectively without significant difference (P = .364). Vector analysis of astigmatic correction showed no significant diffrence between two groups. CONCLUSION: V4 and V4c TICL have similar efficacy with regard to visual acuity and refractive outcomes and rotational stability. Public Library of Science 2017-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5573270/ /pubmed/28846701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183335 Text en © 2017 Hyun et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hyun, Joo
Lim, Dong Hui
Eo, Doo Ri
Hwang, Sungsoon
Chung, Eui-Sang
Chung, Tae-Young
A comparison of visual outcome and rotational stability of two types of toric implantable collamer lenses (TICL) : V4 versus V4c
title A comparison of visual outcome and rotational stability of two types of toric implantable collamer lenses (TICL) : V4 versus V4c
title_full A comparison of visual outcome and rotational stability of two types of toric implantable collamer lenses (TICL) : V4 versus V4c
title_fullStr A comparison of visual outcome and rotational stability of two types of toric implantable collamer lenses (TICL) : V4 versus V4c
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of visual outcome and rotational stability of two types of toric implantable collamer lenses (TICL) : V4 versus V4c
title_short A comparison of visual outcome and rotational stability of two types of toric implantable collamer lenses (TICL) : V4 versus V4c
title_sort comparison of visual outcome and rotational stability of two types of toric implantable collamer lenses (ticl) : v4 versus v4c
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5573270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28846701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183335
work_keys_str_mv AT hyunjoo acomparisonofvisualoutcomeandrotationalstabilityoftwotypesoftoricimplantablecollamerlensesticlv4versusv4c
AT limdonghui acomparisonofvisualoutcomeandrotationalstabilityoftwotypesoftoricimplantablecollamerlensesticlv4versusv4c
AT eodoori acomparisonofvisualoutcomeandrotationalstabilityoftwotypesoftoricimplantablecollamerlensesticlv4versusv4c
AT hwangsungsoon acomparisonofvisualoutcomeandrotationalstabilityoftwotypesoftoricimplantablecollamerlensesticlv4versusv4c
AT chungeuisang acomparisonofvisualoutcomeandrotationalstabilityoftwotypesoftoricimplantablecollamerlensesticlv4versusv4c
AT chungtaeyoung acomparisonofvisualoutcomeandrotationalstabilityoftwotypesoftoricimplantablecollamerlensesticlv4versusv4c
AT hyunjoo comparisonofvisualoutcomeandrotationalstabilityoftwotypesoftoricimplantablecollamerlensesticlv4versusv4c
AT limdonghui comparisonofvisualoutcomeandrotationalstabilityoftwotypesoftoricimplantablecollamerlensesticlv4versusv4c
AT eodoori comparisonofvisualoutcomeandrotationalstabilityoftwotypesoftoricimplantablecollamerlensesticlv4versusv4c
AT hwangsungsoon comparisonofvisualoutcomeandrotationalstabilityoftwotypesoftoricimplantablecollamerlensesticlv4versusv4c
AT chungeuisang comparisonofvisualoutcomeandrotationalstabilityoftwotypesoftoricimplantablecollamerlensesticlv4versusv4c
AT chungtaeyoung comparisonofvisualoutcomeandrotationalstabilityoftwotypesoftoricimplantablecollamerlensesticlv4versusv4c