Cargando…

The validity and reliability of remote diabetic foot ulcer assessment using mobile phone images

Despite their potential for telemedicine in diabetic foot ulcer treatment, diagnostic accuracy of assessment of diabetic foot ulcers using mobile phone images is unknown. Our aim was to determine the validity and reliability of remote diabetic foot ulcer assessment using mobile phone images. Fifty d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Netten, Jaap J., Clark, Damien, Lazzarini, Peter A., Janda, Monika, Reed, Lloyd F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5573347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28842686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09828-4
_version_ 1783259641731350528
author van Netten, Jaap J.
Clark, Damien
Lazzarini, Peter A.
Janda, Monika
Reed, Lloyd F.
author_facet van Netten, Jaap J.
Clark, Damien
Lazzarini, Peter A.
Janda, Monika
Reed, Lloyd F.
author_sort van Netten, Jaap J.
collection PubMed
description Despite their potential for telemedicine in diabetic foot ulcer treatment, diagnostic accuracy of assessment of diabetic foot ulcers using mobile phone images is unknown. Our aim was to determine the validity and reliability of remote diabetic foot ulcer assessment using mobile phone images. Fifty diabetic foot ulcers were assessed live and photographed. Five independent observers remotely assessed the mobile phone images twice for presence of nine clinical characteristics and three treatment decisions. Positive likelihood (LLR+) and negative likelihood (LLR−) ratios were calculated for validity. Multirater Randolph’s and bi-rater Bennet kappa values were calculated for reliability. LLR+ ranged from 1.3–4.2; LLR− ranged from 0.13–0.88; the treatment decision ‘peri-wound debridement’ was the only item with ‘strong diagnostic evidence’. Inter-observer reliability kappa ranged from 0.09–0.71; test-retest reliability from 0.45–0.86; the treatment decision ‘peri-wound debridement’ was the only item with ‘adequate agreement’. In conclusion, mobile phone images had low validity and reliability for remote assessment of diabetic foot ulcers and should not be used as a stand-alone diagnostic instrument. Clinicians who use mobile phone images in clinical practice should obtain as much additional information as possible when making treatment decisions based on these images, and be cautious of the low diagnostic accuracy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5573347
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55733472017-09-01 The validity and reliability of remote diabetic foot ulcer assessment using mobile phone images van Netten, Jaap J. Clark, Damien Lazzarini, Peter A. Janda, Monika Reed, Lloyd F. Sci Rep Article Despite their potential for telemedicine in diabetic foot ulcer treatment, diagnostic accuracy of assessment of diabetic foot ulcers using mobile phone images is unknown. Our aim was to determine the validity and reliability of remote diabetic foot ulcer assessment using mobile phone images. Fifty diabetic foot ulcers were assessed live and photographed. Five independent observers remotely assessed the mobile phone images twice for presence of nine clinical characteristics and three treatment decisions. Positive likelihood (LLR+) and negative likelihood (LLR−) ratios were calculated for validity. Multirater Randolph’s and bi-rater Bennet kappa values were calculated for reliability. LLR+ ranged from 1.3–4.2; LLR− ranged from 0.13–0.88; the treatment decision ‘peri-wound debridement’ was the only item with ‘strong diagnostic evidence’. Inter-observer reliability kappa ranged from 0.09–0.71; test-retest reliability from 0.45–0.86; the treatment decision ‘peri-wound debridement’ was the only item with ‘adequate agreement’. In conclusion, mobile phone images had low validity and reliability for remote assessment of diabetic foot ulcers and should not be used as a stand-alone diagnostic instrument. Clinicians who use mobile phone images in clinical practice should obtain as much additional information as possible when making treatment decisions based on these images, and be cautious of the low diagnostic accuracy. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5573347/ /pubmed/28842686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09828-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
van Netten, Jaap J.
Clark, Damien
Lazzarini, Peter A.
Janda, Monika
Reed, Lloyd F.
The validity and reliability of remote diabetic foot ulcer assessment using mobile phone images
title The validity and reliability of remote diabetic foot ulcer assessment using mobile phone images
title_full The validity and reliability of remote diabetic foot ulcer assessment using mobile phone images
title_fullStr The validity and reliability of remote diabetic foot ulcer assessment using mobile phone images
title_full_unstemmed The validity and reliability of remote diabetic foot ulcer assessment using mobile phone images
title_short The validity and reliability of remote diabetic foot ulcer assessment using mobile phone images
title_sort validity and reliability of remote diabetic foot ulcer assessment using mobile phone images
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5573347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28842686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09828-4
work_keys_str_mv AT vannettenjaapj thevalidityandreliabilityofremotediabeticfootulcerassessmentusingmobilephoneimages
AT clarkdamien thevalidityandreliabilityofremotediabeticfootulcerassessmentusingmobilephoneimages
AT lazzarinipetera thevalidityandreliabilityofremotediabeticfootulcerassessmentusingmobilephoneimages
AT jandamonika thevalidityandreliabilityofremotediabeticfootulcerassessmentusingmobilephoneimages
AT reedlloydf thevalidityandreliabilityofremotediabeticfootulcerassessmentusingmobilephoneimages
AT vannettenjaapj validityandreliabilityofremotediabeticfootulcerassessmentusingmobilephoneimages
AT clarkdamien validityandreliabilityofremotediabeticfootulcerassessmentusingmobilephoneimages
AT lazzarinipetera validityandreliabilityofremotediabeticfootulcerassessmentusingmobilephoneimages
AT jandamonika validityandreliabilityofremotediabeticfootulcerassessmentusingmobilephoneimages
AT reedlloydf validityandreliabilityofremotediabeticfootulcerassessmentusingmobilephoneimages