Cargando…
The validity and reliability of remote diabetic foot ulcer assessment using mobile phone images
Despite their potential for telemedicine in diabetic foot ulcer treatment, diagnostic accuracy of assessment of diabetic foot ulcers using mobile phone images is unknown. Our aim was to determine the validity and reliability of remote diabetic foot ulcer assessment using mobile phone images. Fifty d...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5573347/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28842686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09828-4 |
_version_ | 1783259641731350528 |
---|---|
author | van Netten, Jaap J. Clark, Damien Lazzarini, Peter A. Janda, Monika Reed, Lloyd F. |
author_facet | van Netten, Jaap J. Clark, Damien Lazzarini, Peter A. Janda, Monika Reed, Lloyd F. |
author_sort | van Netten, Jaap J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite their potential for telemedicine in diabetic foot ulcer treatment, diagnostic accuracy of assessment of diabetic foot ulcers using mobile phone images is unknown. Our aim was to determine the validity and reliability of remote diabetic foot ulcer assessment using mobile phone images. Fifty diabetic foot ulcers were assessed live and photographed. Five independent observers remotely assessed the mobile phone images twice for presence of nine clinical characteristics and three treatment decisions. Positive likelihood (LLR+) and negative likelihood (LLR−) ratios were calculated for validity. Multirater Randolph’s and bi-rater Bennet kappa values were calculated for reliability. LLR+ ranged from 1.3–4.2; LLR− ranged from 0.13–0.88; the treatment decision ‘peri-wound debridement’ was the only item with ‘strong diagnostic evidence’. Inter-observer reliability kappa ranged from 0.09–0.71; test-retest reliability from 0.45–0.86; the treatment decision ‘peri-wound debridement’ was the only item with ‘adequate agreement’. In conclusion, mobile phone images had low validity and reliability for remote assessment of diabetic foot ulcers and should not be used as a stand-alone diagnostic instrument. Clinicians who use mobile phone images in clinical practice should obtain as much additional information as possible when making treatment decisions based on these images, and be cautious of the low diagnostic accuracy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5573347 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55733472017-09-01 The validity and reliability of remote diabetic foot ulcer assessment using mobile phone images van Netten, Jaap J. Clark, Damien Lazzarini, Peter A. Janda, Monika Reed, Lloyd F. Sci Rep Article Despite their potential for telemedicine in diabetic foot ulcer treatment, diagnostic accuracy of assessment of diabetic foot ulcers using mobile phone images is unknown. Our aim was to determine the validity and reliability of remote diabetic foot ulcer assessment using mobile phone images. Fifty diabetic foot ulcers were assessed live and photographed. Five independent observers remotely assessed the mobile phone images twice for presence of nine clinical characteristics and three treatment decisions. Positive likelihood (LLR+) and negative likelihood (LLR−) ratios were calculated for validity. Multirater Randolph’s and bi-rater Bennet kappa values were calculated for reliability. LLR+ ranged from 1.3–4.2; LLR− ranged from 0.13–0.88; the treatment decision ‘peri-wound debridement’ was the only item with ‘strong diagnostic evidence’. Inter-observer reliability kappa ranged from 0.09–0.71; test-retest reliability from 0.45–0.86; the treatment decision ‘peri-wound debridement’ was the only item with ‘adequate agreement’. In conclusion, mobile phone images had low validity and reliability for remote assessment of diabetic foot ulcers and should not be used as a stand-alone diagnostic instrument. Clinicians who use mobile phone images in clinical practice should obtain as much additional information as possible when making treatment decisions based on these images, and be cautious of the low diagnostic accuracy. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5573347/ /pubmed/28842686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09828-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article van Netten, Jaap J. Clark, Damien Lazzarini, Peter A. Janda, Monika Reed, Lloyd F. The validity and reliability of remote diabetic foot ulcer assessment using mobile phone images |
title | The validity and reliability of remote diabetic foot ulcer assessment using mobile phone images |
title_full | The validity and reliability of remote diabetic foot ulcer assessment using mobile phone images |
title_fullStr | The validity and reliability of remote diabetic foot ulcer assessment using mobile phone images |
title_full_unstemmed | The validity and reliability of remote diabetic foot ulcer assessment using mobile phone images |
title_short | The validity and reliability of remote diabetic foot ulcer assessment using mobile phone images |
title_sort | validity and reliability of remote diabetic foot ulcer assessment using mobile phone images |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5573347/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28842686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09828-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vannettenjaapj thevalidityandreliabilityofremotediabeticfootulcerassessmentusingmobilephoneimages AT clarkdamien thevalidityandreliabilityofremotediabeticfootulcerassessmentusingmobilephoneimages AT lazzarinipetera thevalidityandreliabilityofremotediabeticfootulcerassessmentusingmobilephoneimages AT jandamonika thevalidityandreliabilityofremotediabeticfootulcerassessmentusingmobilephoneimages AT reedlloydf thevalidityandreliabilityofremotediabeticfootulcerassessmentusingmobilephoneimages AT vannettenjaapj validityandreliabilityofremotediabeticfootulcerassessmentusingmobilephoneimages AT clarkdamien validityandreliabilityofremotediabeticfootulcerassessmentusingmobilephoneimages AT lazzarinipetera validityandreliabilityofremotediabeticfootulcerassessmentusingmobilephoneimages AT jandamonika validityandreliabilityofremotediabeticfootulcerassessmentusingmobilephoneimages AT reedlloydf validityandreliabilityofremotediabeticfootulcerassessmentusingmobilephoneimages |