Cargando…

Shear bond strength of brackets bonded to porcelain surface: in vitro study

PURPOSE: To compare the effects of different porcelain surface treatment methods on the shear bond strength (SBS) and fracture mode of orthodontic brackets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy feldspathic porcelain disk samples mounted in acrylic resin blocks were divided into seven groups (n=10) accordi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alakus Sabuncuoglu, Fidan, Erturk, Ergul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Istanbul University Faculty of Dentisty 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5573448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28955550
http://dx.doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.95403
_version_ 1783259663601500160
author Alakus Sabuncuoglu, Fidan
Erturk, Ergul
author_facet Alakus Sabuncuoglu, Fidan
Erturk, Ergul
author_sort Alakus Sabuncuoglu, Fidan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the effects of different porcelain surface treatment methods on the shear bond strength (SBS) and fracture mode of orthodontic brackets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy feldspathic porcelain disk samples mounted in acrylic resin blocks were divided into seven groups (n=10) according to type of surface treatment: I, Diamond bur; II, Orthosphoric acid (OPA); III, hydrofluoric acid (HFA); IV, sandblasted with aluminum oxide (SB); V, SB+HFA; VI, Neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) laser; VII, Erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser. Brackets were affixed to treated all-porcelain surfaces with a silane bonding agent and adhesive resin and subjected to SBS testing. Specimens were evaluated according to the adhesive remnant index (ARI), and failure modes were assessed quantitatively under a stereomicroscope and morphologically under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance and the post-hoc Tukey test, with the significance level set at 0.05. RESULTS: The highest SBS values were observed for Group V, with no significant difference between Groups V and III. SBS values for Group I were significantly lower than those of all other groups tested. The porcelain/resin interface was the most common site of failure in Group V (40%) and Group III (30%), whereas other groups showed various types of bond failure, with no specific location pre-dominating, but with some of the adhesive left on the porcelain surfaces (ARI scores 2 or 3) in most cases. CONCLUSION: The current findings indicate that a diamond bur alone is unable to sufficiently etch porcelain surfaces for bracket bonding. Moreover, SB and HFA etching used in combination results in a significantly higher shear-bond strength than HFA or SB alone. Finally, laser etching with either an Nd:YAG or Er:YAG laser was found to be more effective and less time-consuming than both HFA acid and SB for the treatment of deglazed feldspathic porcelain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5573448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Istanbul University Faculty of Dentisty
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55734482017-09-27 Shear bond strength of brackets bonded to porcelain surface: in vitro study Alakus Sabuncuoglu, Fidan Erturk, Ergul J Istanb Univ Fac Dent Articles PURPOSE: To compare the effects of different porcelain surface treatment methods on the shear bond strength (SBS) and fracture mode of orthodontic brackets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy feldspathic porcelain disk samples mounted in acrylic resin blocks were divided into seven groups (n=10) according to type of surface treatment: I, Diamond bur; II, Orthosphoric acid (OPA); III, hydrofluoric acid (HFA); IV, sandblasted with aluminum oxide (SB); V, SB+HFA; VI, Neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) laser; VII, Erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser. Brackets were affixed to treated all-porcelain surfaces with a silane bonding agent and adhesive resin and subjected to SBS testing. Specimens were evaluated according to the adhesive remnant index (ARI), and failure modes were assessed quantitatively under a stereomicroscope and morphologically under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance and the post-hoc Tukey test, with the significance level set at 0.05. RESULTS: The highest SBS values were observed for Group V, with no significant difference between Groups V and III. SBS values for Group I were significantly lower than those of all other groups tested. The porcelain/resin interface was the most common site of failure in Group V (40%) and Group III (30%), whereas other groups showed various types of bond failure, with no specific location pre-dominating, but with some of the adhesive left on the porcelain surfaces (ARI scores 2 or 3) in most cases. CONCLUSION: The current findings indicate that a diamond bur alone is unable to sufficiently etch porcelain surfaces for bracket bonding. Moreover, SB and HFA etching used in combination results in a significantly higher shear-bond strength than HFA or SB alone. Finally, laser etching with either an Nd:YAG or Er:YAG laser was found to be more effective and less time-consuming than both HFA acid and SB for the treatment of deglazed feldspathic porcelain. Istanbul University Faculty of Dentisty 2016-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5573448/ /pubmed/28955550 http://dx.doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.95403 Text en Copyright © 2016 Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry This article is licensed under Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license ( (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ). Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. Users may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the journal endorses its use. The material cannot be used for commercial purposes. If the user remixes, transforms, or builds upon the material, he/she may not distribute the modified material. No warranties are given. The license may not give the user all of the permissions necessary for his/her intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how the material can be used.
spellingShingle Articles
Alakus Sabuncuoglu, Fidan
Erturk, Ergul
Shear bond strength of brackets bonded to porcelain surface: in vitro study
title Shear bond strength of brackets bonded to porcelain surface: in vitro study
title_full Shear bond strength of brackets bonded to porcelain surface: in vitro study
title_fullStr Shear bond strength of brackets bonded to porcelain surface: in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Shear bond strength of brackets bonded to porcelain surface: in vitro study
title_short Shear bond strength of brackets bonded to porcelain surface: in vitro study
title_sort shear bond strength of brackets bonded to porcelain surface: in vitro study
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5573448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28955550
http://dx.doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.95403
work_keys_str_mv AT alakussabuncuoglufidan shearbondstrengthofbracketsbondedtoporcelainsurfaceinvitrostudy
AT erturkergul shearbondstrengthofbracketsbondedtoporcelainsurfaceinvitrostudy