Cargando…

The comparison of the precision of different dental radiographic methods in mandibular peri-implantary measurements: an in vitro study

PURPOSE: The objective of this in vitro study was to investigate and compare the precisions of several radiodiagnostic methods used in dentistry for the measurement of peri-implantary sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six dental implants were placed in a human cadaver mandible. Periapical radiographs ob...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bilhan, Hakan, Geckili, Onur, Arat Bilhan, Selda, Aycicek, Fatih, Albayrak, Berkman, Bozbulut, Pelin, Unalan, Fatma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Istanbul University Faculty of Dentisty 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5573457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28955519
http://dx.doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.55134
_version_ 1783259665783586816
author Bilhan, Hakan
Geckili, Onur
Arat Bilhan, Selda
Aycicek, Fatih
Albayrak, Berkman
Bozbulut, Pelin
Unalan, Fatma
author_facet Bilhan, Hakan
Geckili, Onur
Arat Bilhan, Selda
Aycicek, Fatih
Albayrak, Berkman
Bozbulut, Pelin
Unalan, Fatma
author_sort Bilhan, Hakan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The objective of this in vitro study was to investigate and compare the precisions of several radiodiagnostic methods used in dentistry for the measurement of peri-implantary sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six dental implants were placed in a human cadaver mandible. Periapical radiographs obtained with the parallel as well as the bisecting angle technique, digital and conventional panoramic radiographs were used for implant and peri-implant bone measurements. The measurement results at each implant were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The ICC values for the inter-observer reliability were 0.79 for implant diameters and 0.96 for implant lengths. Statistical significance was not detected between the differences of the measurements of the 2 examiners from the original implant dimensions related to anatomic locations. For both of the examiner measurements, significantly less difference from the original implant dimensions was detected in the parallel technique compared to the other techniques (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The present study showed that the most precise peri-implant bone measurements can be obtained from periapical radiographies by using the parallel technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5573457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Istanbul University Faculty of Dentisty
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55734572017-09-27 The comparison of the precision of different dental radiographic methods in mandibular peri-implantary measurements: an in vitro study Bilhan, Hakan Geckili, Onur Arat Bilhan, Selda Aycicek, Fatih Albayrak, Berkman Bozbulut, Pelin Unalan, Fatma J Istanb Univ Fac Dent Articles PURPOSE: The objective of this in vitro study was to investigate and compare the precisions of several radiodiagnostic methods used in dentistry for the measurement of peri-implantary sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six dental implants were placed in a human cadaver mandible. Periapical radiographs obtained with the parallel as well as the bisecting angle technique, digital and conventional panoramic radiographs were used for implant and peri-implant bone measurements. The measurement results at each implant were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The ICC values for the inter-observer reliability were 0.79 for implant diameters and 0.96 for implant lengths. Statistical significance was not detected between the differences of the measurements of the 2 examiners from the original implant dimensions related to anatomic locations. For both of the examiner measurements, significantly less difference from the original implant dimensions was detected in the parallel technique compared to the other techniques (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The present study showed that the most precise peri-implant bone measurements can be obtained from periapical radiographies by using the parallel technique. Istanbul University Faculty of Dentisty 2015-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5573457/ /pubmed/28955519 http://dx.doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.55134 Text en Copyright © 2015 Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry This article is licensed under Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license ( (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ). Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. Users may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the journal endorses its use. The material cannot be used for commercial purposes. If the user remixes, transforms, or builds upon the material, he/she may not distribute the modified material. No warranties are given. The license may not give the user all of the permissions necessary for his/her intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how the material can be used.
spellingShingle Articles
Bilhan, Hakan
Geckili, Onur
Arat Bilhan, Selda
Aycicek, Fatih
Albayrak, Berkman
Bozbulut, Pelin
Unalan, Fatma
The comparison of the precision of different dental radiographic methods in mandibular peri-implantary measurements: an in vitro study
title The comparison of the precision of different dental radiographic methods in mandibular peri-implantary measurements: an in vitro study
title_full The comparison of the precision of different dental radiographic methods in mandibular peri-implantary measurements: an in vitro study
title_fullStr The comparison of the precision of different dental radiographic methods in mandibular peri-implantary measurements: an in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed The comparison of the precision of different dental radiographic methods in mandibular peri-implantary measurements: an in vitro study
title_short The comparison of the precision of different dental radiographic methods in mandibular peri-implantary measurements: an in vitro study
title_sort comparison of the precision of different dental radiographic methods in mandibular peri-implantary measurements: an in vitro study
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5573457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28955519
http://dx.doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.55134
work_keys_str_mv AT bilhanhakan thecomparisonoftheprecisionofdifferentdentalradiographicmethodsinmandibularperiimplantarymeasurementsaninvitrostudy
AT geckilionur thecomparisonoftheprecisionofdifferentdentalradiographicmethodsinmandibularperiimplantarymeasurementsaninvitrostudy
AT aratbilhanselda thecomparisonoftheprecisionofdifferentdentalradiographicmethodsinmandibularperiimplantarymeasurementsaninvitrostudy
AT aycicekfatih thecomparisonoftheprecisionofdifferentdentalradiographicmethodsinmandibularperiimplantarymeasurementsaninvitrostudy
AT albayrakberkman thecomparisonoftheprecisionofdifferentdentalradiographicmethodsinmandibularperiimplantarymeasurementsaninvitrostudy
AT bozbulutpelin thecomparisonoftheprecisionofdifferentdentalradiographicmethodsinmandibularperiimplantarymeasurementsaninvitrostudy
AT unalanfatma thecomparisonoftheprecisionofdifferentdentalradiographicmethodsinmandibularperiimplantarymeasurementsaninvitrostudy
AT bilhanhakan comparisonoftheprecisionofdifferentdentalradiographicmethodsinmandibularperiimplantarymeasurementsaninvitrostudy
AT geckilionur comparisonoftheprecisionofdifferentdentalradiographicmethodsinmandibularperiimplantarymeasurementsaninvitrostudy
AT aratbilhanselda comparisonoftheprecisionofdifferentdentalradiographicmethodsinmandibularperiimplantarymeasurementsaninvitrostudy
AT aycicekfatih comparisonoftheprecisionofdifferentdentalradiographicmethodsinmandibularperiimplantarymeasurementsaninvitrostudy
AT albayrakberkman comparisonoftheprecisionofdifferentdentalradiographicmethodsinmandibularperiimplantarymeasurementsaninvitrostudy
AT bozbulutpelin comparisonoftheprecisionofdifferentdentalradiographicmethodsinmandibularperiimplantarymeasurementsaninvitrostudy
AT unalanfatma comparisonoftheprecisionofdifferentdentalradiographicmethodsinmandibularperiimplantarymeasurementsaninvitrostudy