Cargando…

Etiologic factors and clinical evaluation of restored fractured anterior teeth: an observational study

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to investigate the etiologic factors and to evaluate performance of composite resin on fractured crown in permanent anterior teeth at 6 and 12 months. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Records from 51 patients were retrieved from a Dental School Clinic, comprising 73 fractur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koc Vural, Uzay, Kiremitci, Arlin, Gokalp, Saadet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Istanbul University Faculty of Dentisty 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5573513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28955574
http://dx.doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.75775
_version_ 1783259679267225600
author Koc Vural, Uzay
Kiremitci, Arlin
Gokalp, Saadet
author_facet Koc Vural, Uzay
Kiremitci, Arlin
Gokalp, Saadet
author_sort Koc Vural, Uzay
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to investigate the etiologic factors and to evaluate performance of composite resin on fractured crown in permanent anterior teeth at 6 and 12 months. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Records from 51 patients were retrieved from a Dental School Clinic, comprising 73 fractured anterior teeth directly restored with a submicron hybrid composite (Spectrum TPH) resin and respective adhesive system (Prime and Bond NT) were evaluated. The United States Public Health Service criteria were used to assess the clinical evaluation. Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank, Kruskal–Wallis, Mann–Whitney U, and Siegel and Castellan tests. RESULTS: Seventy-two maxillary incisors and one canine of 51 patients were evaluated. The patient’s age at the time of therapy ranged from 14 to 64 years old (mean 25.47). Mostly observed crown fracture was seen in upper incisors (84.9%) and due to falls (58.8%). At the 6-month follow-up, one patient lost one restoration and at the 12-month, one patient lost one and one lost two restorations. A statistically significant difference was found in terms of marginal adaptation between 6 and 12 months. CONCLUSION: In this short-term observation period, remaining tooth structure was conserved and good patient compliance was achieved. Factors such as esthetic and/or cost should be considered to indicate the direct composite restorations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5573513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Istanbul University Faculty of Dentisty
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55735132017-09-27 Etiologic factors and clinical evaluation of restored fractured anterior teeth: an observational study Koc Vural, Uzay Kiremitci, Arlin Gokalp, Saadet J Istanb Univ Fac Dent Articles PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to investigate the etiologic factors and to evaluate performance of composite resin on fractured crown in permanent anterior teeth at 6 and 12 months. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Records from 51 patients were retrieved from a Dental School Clinic, comprising 73 fractured anterior teeth directly restored with a submicron hybrid composite (Spectrum TPH) resin and respective adhesive system (Prime and Bond NT) were evaluated. The United States Public Health Service criteria were used to assess the clinical evaluation. Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank, Kruskal–Wallis, Mann–Whitney U, and Siegel and Castellan tests. RESULTS: Seventy-two maxillary incisors and one canine of 51 patients were evaluated. The patient’s age at the time of therapy ranged from 14 to 64 years old (mean 25.47). Mostly observed crown fracture was seen in upper incisors (84.9%) and due to falls (58.8%). At the 6-month follow-up, one patient lost one restoration and at the 12-month, one patient lost one and one lost two restorations. A statistically significant difference was found in terms of marginal adaptation between 6 and 12 months. CONCLUSION: In this short-term observation period, remaining tooth structure was conserved and good patient compliance was achieved. Factors such as esthetic and/or cost should be considered to indicate the direct composite restorations. Istanbul University Faculty of Dentisty 2016-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5573513/ /pubmed/28955574 http://dx.doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.75775 Text en Copyright © 2016 Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry This article is licensed under Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license ( (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ). Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. Users may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the journal endorses its use. The material cannot be used for commercial purposes. If the user remixes, transforms, or builds upon the material, he/she may not distribute the modified material. No warranties are given. The license may not give the user all of the permissions necessary for his/her intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how the material can be used.
spellingShingle Articles
Koc Vural, Uzay
Kiremitci, Arlin
Gokalp, Saadet
Etiologic factors and clinical evaluation of restored fractured anterior teeth: an observational study
title Etiologic factors and clinical evaluation of restored fractured anterior teeth: an observational study
title_full Etiologic factors and clinical evaluation of restored fractured anterior teeth: an observational study
title_fullStr Etiologic factors and clinical evaluation of restored fractured anterior teeth: an observational study
title_full_unstemmed Etiologic factors and clinical evaluation of restored fractured anterior teeth: an observational study
title_short Etiologic factors and clinical evaluation of restored fractured anterior teeth: an observational study
title_sort etiologic factors and clinical evaluation of restored fractured anterior teeth: an observational study
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5573513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28955574
http://dx.doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.75775
work_keys_str_mv AT kocvuraluzay etiologicfactorsandclinicalevaluationofrestoredfracturedanteriorteethanobservationalstudy
AT kiremitciarlin etiologicfactorsandclinicalevaluationofrestoredfracturedanteriorteethanobservationalstudy
AT gokalpsaadet etiologicfactorsandclinicalevaluationofrestoredfracturedanteriorteethanobservationalstudy