Cargando…

Reciproc versus Twisted file for root canal filling removal: assessment of apically extruded debris

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris during endodontic retreatment with different file systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty extracted human mandibular premolar teeth were used in this study. Root canals of the teeth were instrumented and filled befor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Altunbas, Demet, Kutuk, Betul, Toyoglu, Mustafa, Kutlu, Gizem, Kustarci, Alper, Er, Kursat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Istanbul University Faculty of Dentisty 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5573529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28955563
http://dx.doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.96734
_version_ 1783259681486012416
author Altunbas, Demet
Kutuk, Betul
Toyoglu, Mustafa
Kutlu, Gizem
Kustarci, Alper
Er, Kursat
author_facet Altunbas, Demet
Kutuk, Betul
Toyoglu, Mustafa
Kutlu, Gizem
Kustarci, Alper
Er, Kursat
author_sort Altunbas, Demet
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris during endodontic retreatment with different file systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty extracted human mandibular premolar teeth were used in this study. Root canals of the teeth were instrumented and filled before being randomly assigned to three groups. Guttapercha was removed using the Reciproc system, the Twisted File system (TF), and Hedström-files (H-file). Apically extruded debris was collected and dried in pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes. The amount of extruded debris was assessed with an electronic balance. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: The Reciproc and TF systems extruded significantly less debris than the H-file (p<0.05). However, no significant difference was found between the Reciproc and TF systems. CONCLUSION: All tested file systems caused apical extrusion of debris. Both the rotary file (TF) and the reciprocating single-file (Reciproc) systems were associated with less apical extrusion compared with the H-file.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5573529
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Istanbul University Faculty of Dentisty
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55735292017-09-27 Reciproc versus Twisted file for root canal filling removal: assessment of apically extruded debris Altunbas, Demet Kutuk, Betul Toyoglu, Mustafa Kutlu, Gizem Kustarci, Alper Er, Kursat J Istanb Univ Fac Dent Articles PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris during endodontic retreatment with different file systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty extracted human mandibular premolar teeth were used in this study. Root canals of the teeth were instrumented and filled before being randomly assigned to three groups. Guttapercha was removed using the Reciproc system, the Twisted File system (TF), and Hedström-files (H-file). Apically extruded debris was collected and dried in pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes. The amount of extruded debris was assessed with an electronic balance. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: The Reciproc and TF systems extruded significantly less debris than the H-file (p<0.05). However, no significant difference was found between the Reciproc and TF systems. CONCLUSION: All tested file systems caused apical extrusion of debris. Both the rotary file (TF) and the reciprocating single-file (Reciproc) systems were associated with less apical extrusion compared with the H-file. Istanbul University Faculty of Dentisty 2016-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5573529/ /pubmed/28955563 http://dx.doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.96734 Text en Copyright © 2016 Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry This article is licensed under Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license ( (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ). Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. Users may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the journal endorses its use. The material cannot be used for commercial purposes. If the user remixes, transforms, or builds upon the material, he/she may not distribute the modified material. No warranties are given. The license may not give the user all of the permissions necessary for his/her intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how the material can be used.
spellingShingle Articles
Altunbas, Demet
Kutuk, Betul
Toyoglu, Mustafa
Kutlu, Gizem
Kustarci, Alper
Er, Kursat
Reciproc versus Twisted file for root canal filling removal: assessment of apically extruded debris
title Reciproc versus Twisted file for root canal filling removal: assessment of apically extruded debris
title_full Reciproc versus Twisted file for root canal filling removal: assessment of apically extruded debris
title_fullStr Reciproc versus Twisted file for root canal filling removal: assessment of apically extruded debris
title_full_unstemmed Reciproc versus Twisted file for root canal filling removal: assessment of apically extruded debris
title_short Reciproc versus Twisted file for root canal filling removal: assessment of apically extruded debris
title_sort reciproc versus twisted file for root canal filling removal: assessment of apically extruded debris
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5573529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28955563
http://dx.doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.96734
work_keys_str_mv AT altunbasdemet reciprocversustwistedfileforrootcanalfillingremovalassessmentofapicallyextrudeddebris
AT kutukbetul reciprocversustwistedfileforrootcanalfillingremovalassessmentofapicallyextrudeddebris
AT toyoglumustafa reciprocversustwistedfileforrootcanalfillingremovalassessmentofapicallyextrudeddebris
AT kutlugizem reciprocversustwistedfileforrootcanalfillingremovalassessmentofapicallyextrudeddebris
AT kustarcialper reciprocversustwistedfileforrootcanalfillingremovalassessmentofapicallyextrudeddebris
AT erkursat reciprocversustwistedfileforrootcanalfillingremovalassessmentofapicallyextrudeddebris